<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/1.5.1-alpha" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Shuttle coverage numbers&#8230;</title>
	<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2005/07/14/shuttle-coverage-numbers/</link>
	<description>Unvarnished news &#038; opinion on cable news</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2013 08:08:15 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=1.5.1-alpha</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: MrTony</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2005/07/14/shuttle-coverage-numbers/#comment-847</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jul 2005 17:40:28 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2005/07/14/shuttle-coverage-numbers/#comment-847</guid>
					<description>Couldn't agree more ravi.  FNC and particularly Shep Smith did a fantastic job on coverage.  I really hope the shuttle takes off soon though, it should be exciting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Couldn&#8217;t agree more ravi.  FNC and particularly Shep Smith did a fantastic job on coverage.  I really hope the shuttle takes off soon though, it should be exciting.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: anonymous</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2005/07/14/shuttle-coverage-numbers/#comment-844</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jul 2005 16:47:13 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2005/07/14/shuttle-coverage-numbers/#comment-844</guid>
					<description>FNC must have thought the clogged fuel sensors was a form of terrorism.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>FNC must have thought the clogged fuel sensors was a form of terrorism.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2005/07/14/shuttle-coverage-numbers/#comment-837</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jul 2005 11:52:23 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2005/07/14/shuttle-coverage-numbers/#comment-837</guid>
					<description>So, they should play to the repubs just to get viewers LIKE FOCKS does?  I think everyone pretty much knows it's politics that drives what channel someone watches.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>So, they should play to the repubs just to get viewers LIKE FOCKS does?  I think everyone pretty much knows it&#8217;s politics that drives what channel someone watches.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: ravi</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2005/07/14/shuttle-coverage-numbers/#comment-829</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jul 2005 09:46:30 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2005/07/14/shuttle-coverage-numbers/#comment-829</guid>
					<description>More likely, the least biased gets the best numbers, Sam I am.  Not that there's anything biased about a shuttle launch.  It's just that as long as CNN and PMSNBC shill for Dems, no one will watch.  I wonder if they'll ever learn that lesson.  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>More likely, the least biased gets the best numbers, Sam I am.  Not that there&#8217;s anything biased about a shuttle launch.  It&#8217;s just that as long as CNN and PMSNBC shill for Dems, no one will watch.  I wonder if they&#8217;ll ever learn that lesson.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: My sister Sam</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2005/07/14/shuttle-coverage-numbers/#comment-820</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jul 2005 18:18:20 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2005/07/14/shuttle-coverage-numbers/#comment-820</guid>
					<description>Once again, the worst coveage gets the best #'s. When will the viewers of focks DEMAND better coverage from KNOWLEDGABLE JOURNALISTS?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Once again, the worst coveage gets the best #&#8217;s. When will the viewers of focks DEMAND better coverage from KNOWLEDGABLE JOURNALISTS?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
