Comments on: Frisking Bill O’Reilly…

by: Wake

Tue, 20 Sep 2005 22:50:58 +0100

would you have rathered not learn the truth? and you dem’s are so disgraceful the only thing your side says yes to is mis-represented facts cuz you sure cant on capital hill.

by: Anon

Tue, 20 Sep 2005 22:13:49 +0100

I guess it galls the GOP’ers here no end that facts don’t lie like this administration and their resident apologists and propaganda outlet, Faux do. LOL–you people are way too thin-skinned. You can dish it out but you darn sure can’t take it!

by: Wake

Tue, 20 Sep 2005 21:46:32 +0100

of course bias here :P right?

by: Wake

Tue, 20 Sep 2005 21:45:11 +0100

well they are posting lies i checked the archieve and well here:
“Federal tax revenues will be more this year than at any time during the Clinton administration!” now during the recap he said more under Bush but he was very percise in his analysis.
here:
“Again, here are the facts. Black homeownership is up 2 percent under President Bush. Poverty spending is significantly higher under Bush than it was under Clinton. Educational spending for poor school districts is higher under Bush. And the poverty rate stood at 13.7 percent halfway through Clinton’s tenure. It is 12.7 percent halfway through Bush’s two terms.” no poverty is down, spending is up and home ownership is up.
So i see 2 lies and 1 conviently overlooked point that Bill did make.

by: Wake

Tue, 20 Sep 2005 21:34:11 +0100

Oh and in his talking point memo i beleive he stated spending was up under Bush for entitlement for the poor and such. He was sure not to say the poverty has lessened, it has gone up 4 years in a row. Nice to see the opposing sources are truthful ha.
Oh and you have been deceived AGAIN that tax thing they were mentioning being “lied” about he said Bush made more tax revenue “this year” than any time in the Clinton Administration due to the unexpected 100 billion dollars they recieved.
I still would like to know which program Bush supposedly cut that Clinton breifly mentioned before moving on.
That my friend is very false.
Please check into soemthing for exact words before you post it you just look FOOLISH. that should be the theme of todays talking points memo.

by: bravesfan

Tue, 20 Sep 2005 21:19:15 +0100

Wake that is such an unfair assessment. I think this blog is fairly balanced in its criticism of all the cable networks and the various commentators. I have seen the author of this blog also defend Fox when articles are blatantly biased against the network so any criticism of which way this site “leans” is unfair and irrational.

by: Wake

Tue, 20 Sep 2005 21:12:14 +0100

Stories like this are a good litmus test. Nice to see which side this site is on think ill stick with Mediabistro.com

by: Anon

Tue, 20 Sep 2005 19:44:05 +0100

Is anyone surprised? O’Reilly gets caught lying all the time. I’d be more surprised if he actually told the truth!