Gibson takes on Cafferty…
Johnny Dollar has the audio of John Gibson responding on his radio program to the shots CNN’s Jack Cafferty took at FNC…
February 17, 2006
10 Comments »
TrackBack: http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2006/02/17/gibson-takes-on-cafferty/trackback/
RSS feed for comments on this post.
except that he reserved most of his bile for Larry King, who didn’t have anything to do with Cafferty’s comments.
Comment by Mr A — February 17, 2006 @ 3:36 pm
John’s point is that Cafferty calling Brit Hume “soft” is unfounded and ridiculous, and Cheney at least did not go to King, which is well-known to be a “soft” interviewer.
Comment by Gabe — February 17, 2006 @ 4:39 pm
I side with cafferty. All of the fnc folks are nothing more than blowhards.
Comment by Peter — February 17, 2006 @ 6:47 pm
CNN would be more effective if they reported the news that FNC doesn’t instead of attacking.
Comment by Terance — February 17, 2006 @ 7:02 pm
^
Hey look! One of the biggest RAT blowhards here.
Comment by Lurker — February 17, 2006 @ 7:03 pm
Even if you got Cafferty to shut up, it would be like putting a dress on a pig. He would still be a pig.
Comment by Cara — February 17, 2006 @ 7:15 pm
Ahhh…So let me get this right. It’s ok for FNC to bash CNN at every opportunity BUT when CNN bashes FNC can’t take it. And it looks as though Gibson has been taking lessons from O’reilly…..yep SHUT UP. Maybe that should be the new FNC slogan. FNC, we don’t care what you have say so SHUT UP!!
Comment by Paul — February 17, 2006 @ 7:52 pm
^ Oh look another RAT
Why would FNC waste their time bashing a has-been network? Seems to me it’s always CNN taking shots at FNC then FNC smacks them down with ratings charts etc….
Comment by Lurker — February 17, 2006 @ 8:03 pm
I’m not even getting in this…
Comment by anonymous — February 17, 2006 @ 9:15 pm
Paul,
Brit Hume got the Cheney interview, Caffery (of CNN) slams Brit and Fox, and Gibson responds. So tell us again how you believe that it was Fox that started this all?
Comment by Missy — February 19, 2006 @ 6:07 pm