<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/1.5.1-alpha" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Zorich out at FNC&#8230;</title>
	<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2006/07/11/zorich-out-at-fnc/</link>
	<description>Unvarnished news &#038; opinion on cable news</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 09:00:34 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=1.5.1-alpha</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: sara</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2006/07/11/zorich-out-at-fnc/#comment-12675</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Jul 2006 22:47:08 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2006/07/11/zorich-out-at-fnc/#comment-12675</guid>
					<description>yikes!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>yikes!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Emily</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2006/07/11/zorich-out-at-fnc/#comment-12672</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Jul 2006 21:01:42 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2006/07/11/zorich-out-at-fnc/#comment-12672</guid>
					<description>Poor choice by Fox as loosing Peter Zorich is probably the last nail in DaySide’s coffin. However, being the talented Producer that Peter Zorich is, I’m sure that his skills will be put to better use elsewhere!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Poor choice by Fox as loosing Peter Zorich is probably the last nail in DaySide’s coffin. However, being the talented Producer that Peter Zorich is, I’m sure that his skills will be put to better use elsewhere!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Ira</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2006/07/11/zorich-out-at-fnc/#comment-11711</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Jul 2006 12:25:04 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2006/07/11/zorich-out-at-fnc/#comment-11711</guid>
					<description>Bucky &amp;amp; Robert:  Whether it was asbestos, black mold or whatever, after that incident (which Stetler attempted to portray as another &quot;Love Canal&quot;)and Ailes' subsequent statement that Brian was attempting to be a journalist, my observation is that the TVNewser coverage of FNC changed. 

Just my opinion, guys!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Bucky &amp; Robert:  Whether it was asbestos, black mold or whatever, after that incident (which Stetler attempted to portray as another &#8220;Love Canal&#8221;)and Ailes&#8217; subsequent statement that Brian was attempting to be a journalist, my observation is that the TVNewser coverage of FNC changed. </p>
	<p>Just my opinion, guys!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: David</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2006/07/11/zorich-out-at-fnc/#comment-11665</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Jul 2006 22:41:55 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2006/07/11/zorich-out-at-fnc/#comment-11665</guid>
					<description>Piecing together the details from the various combatants in this thread, I conclude that FNC refuses to talk to TVNewser because Brian wore a hat filled with mold while taking a shot at asbestos sprayed with an illegal chemical.

Am I close? ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Piecing together the details from the various combatants in this thread, I conclude that FNC refuses to talk to TVNewser because Brian wore a hat filled with mold while taking a shot at asbestos sprayed with an illegal chemical.</p>
	<p>Am I close? ;-)
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Scott</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2006/07/11/zorich-out-at-fnc/#comment-11664</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Jul 2006 22:36:25 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2006/07/11/zorich-out-at-fnc/#comment-11664</guid>
					<description>   I agree that Jerrick and Huddy can go overboard sometimes trying to be cute and funny.  But, I've seen them do serious interviews too and they do them well.  While I think that FNC is miles ahead of CNN and MSNBC in terms of both quality and popularity, some fine tuning does need to take place. 
   As for TV Newser, I'm not going to get into whether he is biased or not.  My only comment is that he has a good site but is rather young;for the sake of his own self-interest, he should work to be &quot;fair and balanced&quot; with all the networks.  He may need them for a job or a reference later. (and yes I know I sound really old; I am over 40 now)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I agree that Jerrick and Huddy can go overboard sometimes trying to be cute and funny.  But, I&#8217;ve seen them do serious interviews too and they do them well.  While I think that FNC is miles ahead of CNN and MSNBC in terms of both quality and popularity, some fine tuning does need to take place.<br />
   As for TV Newser, I&#8217;m not going to get into whether he is biased or not.  My only comment is that he has a good site but is rather young;for the sake of his own self-interest, he should work to be &#8220;fair and balanced&#8221; with all the networks.  He may need them for a job or a reference later. (and yes I know I sound really old; I am over 40 now)
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Cable News Watcher</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2006/07/11/zorich-out-at-fnc/#comment-11663</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Jul 2006 22:20:50 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2006/07/11/zorich-out-at-fnc/#comment-11663</guid>
					<description>Dang, no wonder FNC PR has adopted FTV Live and ICN.    Can't wait for one of them to piss them off.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Dang, no wonder FNC PR has adopted FTV Live and ICN.    Can&#8217;t wait for one of them to piss them off.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Bucky</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2006/07/11/zorich-out-at-fnc/#comment-11659</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Jul 2006 22:16:53 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2006/07/11/zorich-out-at-fnc/#comment-11659</guid>
					<description>It wasn't asbestos Ira it was mold due to the extensive leaking. It was also the spraying of an illegal chemical to address a problems with bugs in the building. So Robert Cox was right to say you were talking out of your hat. I work there and know these things to be true though none of it has affected my health.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>It wasn&#8217;t asbestos Ira it was mold due to the extensive leaking. It was also the spraying of an illegal chemical to address a problems with bugs in the building. So Robert Cox was right to say you were talking out of your hat. I work there and know these things to be true though none of it has affected my health.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Steve</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2006/07/11/zorich-out-at-fnc/#comment-11657</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Jul 2006 21:51:16 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2006/07/11/zorich-out-at-fnc/#comment-11657</guid>
					<description>&quot;You are both talking out of your hat.&quot;

Care to expound on your theory?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>&#8220;You are both talking out of your hat.&#8221;</p>
	<p>Care to expound on your theory?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Robert Cox</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2006/07/11/zorich-out-at-fnc/#comment-11654</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Jul 2006 21:22:17 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2006/07/11/zorich-out-at-fnc/#comment-11654</guid>
					<description>Steve and Ira,

You are both talking out of your hat.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Steve and Ira,</p>
	<p>You are both talking out of your hat.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2006/07/11/zorich-out-at-fnc/#comment-11653</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Jul 2006 21:21:12 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2006/07/11/zorich-out-at-fnc/#comment-11653</guid>
					<description>Oh thanks Ira...I didn't know that was the incident that got FNC mad. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Oh thanks Ira&#8230;I didn&#8217;t know that was the incident that got FNC mad.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Ira</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2006/07/11/zorich-out-at-fnc/#comment-11646</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Jul 2006 19:40:50 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2006/07/11/zorich-out-at-fnc/#comment-11646</guid>
					<description>&amp;gt;Hmmm that’s interesting. 
&amp;gt;I thought TVN and FNC were buds? 
&amp;gt;What happened there?? 

Anonymous:  As I said here last week, it was the phony asbestos scandal at the Fox Building reported by TVNewser.  Ailes took a shot at little boy Brian and his reporting has not been fair and balanced since!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>&gt;Hmmm that’s interesting.<br />
&gt;I thought TVN and FNC were buds?<br />
&gt;What happened there?? </p>
	<p>Anonymous:  As I said here last week, it was the phony asbestos scandal at the Fox Building reported by TVNewser.  Ailes took a shot at little boy Brian and his reporting has not been fair and balanced since!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: SuperNoxic</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2006/07/11/zorich-out-at-fnc/#comment-11641</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Jul 2006 19:31:12 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2006/07/11/zorich-out-at-fnc/#comment-11641</guid>
					<description>I don't know. Jerrick and Huddy aren't that professional during some subjects (especially today!) but it's something fun to watch at lunchtime where you can get your hard news and light fare at the same time. It's not like if breaking news occurs during the hour, they won't scrap whatever they have to go it immediately.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I don&#8217;t know. Jerrick and Huddy aren&#8217;t that professional during some subjects (especially today!) but it&#8217;s something fun to watch at lunchtime where you can get your hard news and light fare at the same time. It&#8217;s not like if breaking news occurs during the hour, they won&#8217;t scrap whatever they have to go it immediately.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Spud</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2006/07/11/zorich-out-at-fnc/#comment-11638</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Jul 2006 18:42:56 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2006/07/11/zorich-out-at-fnc/#comment-11638</guid>
					<description>&lt;em&gt;If you’re talking to me, &lt;/em&gt;

No I was talking to Jack.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p><em>If you’re talking to me, </em></p>
	<p>No I was talking to Jack.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Steve</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2006/07/11/zorich-out-at-fnc/#comment-11637</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Jul 2006 18:40:29 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2006/07/11/zorich-out-at-fnc/#comment-11637</guid>
					<description>Back to the original topic of this thread, I don't know how responsible Zorich was for the content of Dayside, but it certainly needed a change.  The two show hosts Huddy and Jerrick just aren't professional together (Huddy's fine when she works with others, but Jerrick is an embarrassment), and the show is quite mediocre altogether.  It just seems very off putting to me when one second you're watching a report of a major bombing somewhere and the next is a segment about the Miami beach patrol with Huddy fawning all over two half naked men.  Maybe if it was E! and not a news channel it would feel so stupid.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Back to the original topic of this thread, I don&#8217;t know how responsible Zorich was for the content of Dayside, but it certainly needed a change.  The two show hosts Huddy and Jerrick just aren&#8217;t professional together (Huddy&#8217;s fine when she works with others, but Jerrick is an embarrassment), and the show is quite mediocre altogether.  It just seems very off putting to me when one second you&#8217;re watching a report of a major bombing somewhere and the next is a segment about the Miami beach patrol with Huddy fawning all over two half naked men.  Maybe if it was E! and not a news channel it would feel so stupid.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Steve</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2006/07/11/zorich-out-at-fnc/#comment-11636</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Jul 2006 18:32:31 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2006/07/11/zorich-out-at-fnc/#comment-11636</guid>
					<description>If you're talking to me, I was trying to be sarcastic.  I think all these call of bias are just B.S.  To say TVNewser is biased towards msnbc would be to ignore the quips he throws at them (deservedly so IMO).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>If you&#8217;re talking to me, I was trying to be sarcastic.  I think all these call of bias are just B.S.  To say TVNewser is biased towards msnbc would be to ignore the quips he throws at them (deservedly so IMO).
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Spud</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2006/07/11/zorich-out-at-fnc/#comment-11634</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Jul 2006 18:19:36 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2006/07/11/zorich-out-at-fnc/#comment-11634</guid>
					<description>And what exactly does the NewsBusters article on the NYT Olbermann piece have to do with establishing the existence of a relationship between TVN and MSNBC?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>And what exactly does the NewsBusters article on the NYT Olbermann piece have to do with establishing the existence of a relationship between TVN and MSNBC?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Steve</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2006/07/11/zorich-out-at-fnc/#comment-11633</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Jul 2006 18:17:00 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2006/07/11/zorich-out-at-fnc/#comment-11633</guid>
					<description>Well if newsbusters says so it must be true.  

Btw I remember when people thought TVNewser (maybe he was still cable newser then) was biased against MSNBC and towards FNC, funny how things change.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Well if newsbusters says so it must be true.  </p>
	<p>Btw I remember when people thought TVNewser (maybe he was still cable newser then) was biased against MSNBC and towards FNC, funny how things change.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Spud</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2006/07/11/zorich-out-at-fnc/#comment-11632</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Jul 2006 18:13:04 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2006/07/11/zorich-out-at-fnc/#comment-11632</guid>
					<description>Newsbusters is not an unbiased source of information...it's about as unbiased as Newshounds...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Newsbusters is not an unbiased source of information&#8230;it&#8217;s about as unbiased as Newshounds&#8230;
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Jack</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2006/07/11/zorich-out-at-fnc/#comment-11628</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Jul 2006 17:04:45 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2006/07/11/zorich-out-at-fnc/#comment-11628</guid>
					<description>NewsBusters disagrees, check the latest post about the NY Times article.  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>NewsBusters disagrees, check the latest post about the NY Times article.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Spud</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2006/07/11/zorich-out-at-fnc/#comment-11627</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Jul 2006 16:55:31 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2006/07/11/zorich-out-at-fnc/#comment-11627</guid>
					<description>That's baloney...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>That&#8217;s baloney&#8230;
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Jack</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2006/07/11/zorich-out-at-fnc/#comment-11626</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Jul 2006 16:37:21 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2006/07/11/zorich-out-at-fnc/#comment-11626</guid>
					<description>Responding to Lance: yes, that is very petty.  Responding to Anonymous: it's been obvious for some time that TVN is buddies with MSNBC, and no one else.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Responding to Lance: yes, that is very petty.  Responding to Anonymous: it&#8217;s been obvious for some time that TVN is buddies with MSNBC, and no one else.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Jack</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2006/07/11/zorich-out-at-fnc/#comment-11625</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Jul 2006 16:03:53 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2006/07/11/zorich-out-at-fnc/#comment-11625</guid>
					<description>Good job scooping TVNewser on confirming.  If he was fair to all cable networks, and not busy promoting MSNBC while putting down FOX, CNN, and CNN Headline News, people wouldn't be turning their backs on him.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Good job scooping TVNewser on confirming.  If he was fair to all cable networks, and not busy promoting MSNBC while putting down FOX, CNN, and CNN Headline News, people wouldn&#8217;t be turning their backs on him.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Lance</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2006/07/11/zorich-out-at-fnc/#comment-11624</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Jul 2006 15:49:18 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2006/07/11/zorich-out-at-fnc/#comment-11624</guid>
					<description>So TV newser says fox told this site what happened because they won't talk to him. i know he's not always a fox fan, but it's that awfully, awfully petty?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>So TV newser says fox told this site what happened because they won&#8217;t talk to him. i know he&#8217;s not always a fox fan, but it&#8217;s that awfully, awfully petty?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Anonmyous</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2006/07/11/zorich-out-at-fnc/#comment-11622</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Jul 2006 15:31:20 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2006/07/11/zorich-out-at-fnc/#comment-11622</guid>
					<description>&quot;Because the Fox News PR department currently chooses not to speak to TVNewser, a spokesperson confirmed the firing to ICN this afternoon.&quot;

Hmmm that's interesting.  I thought TVN and FNC were buds?  What happened there??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>&#8220;Because the Fox News PR department currently chooses not to speak to TVNewser, a spokesperson confirmed the firing to ICN this afternoon.&#8221;</p>
	<p>Hmmm that&#8217;s interesting.  I thought TVN and FNC were buds?  What happened there??
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Bob</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2006/07/11/zorich-out-at-fnc/#comment-11621</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Jul 2006 15:07:34 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2006/07/11/zorich-out-at-fnc/#comment-11621</guid>
					<description>Let's hope that Mike and Juliet will follow him (off the show, at least).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Let&#8217;s hope that Mike and Juliet will follow him (off the show, at least).
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
