<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/1.5.1-alpha" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Thursday Numbers&#8230;</title>
	<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2006/08/04/2873/</link>
	<description>Unvarnished news &#038; opinion on cable news</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 14:17:37 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=1.5.1-alpha</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: BigFoot</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2006/08/04/2873/#comment-13055</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Aug 2006 17:02:15 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2006/08/04/2873/#comment-13055</guid>
					<description>Hey Missy... Imus is one of MSNBC highest rated shows, and it often beats CNN's American Morning.   Get your facts straight, you moron.   But then again, you're probably watching the Today Showing, learning how to be get an eating disorder in time for the beach, or segments on how to train your husband.   One thing about the &quot;Best of Numbers,&quot;  the slimeballs at MSNBC will probably pull it this week and go back to silly news bunnies reading the headlines, which gets horrible ratings as well...  At least the Best of Imus offers something different.  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Hey Missy&#8230; Imus is one of MSNBC highest rated shows, and it often beats CNN&#8217;s American Morning.   Get your facts straight, you moron.   But then again, you&#8217;re probably watching the Today Showing, learning how to be get an eating disorder in time for the beach, or segments on how to train your husband.   One thing about the &#8220;Best of Numbers,&#8221;  the slimeballs at MSNBC will probably pull it this week and go back to silly news bunnies reading the headlines, which gets horrible ratings as well&#8230;  At least the Best of Imus offers something different.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Missy</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2006/08/04/2873/#comment-13013</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Aug 2006 13:04:19 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2006/08/04/2873/#comment-13013</guid>
					<description>Anonymous is correct.  Plus, Imus doesn't get such great ratings to begin with, so why would they expect that it would do well in repeats!

And CNW, while we know you have to take a shot at Fox each time you post, on what time frame are you basing your statement?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Anonymous is correct.  Plus, Imus doesn&#8217;t get such great ratings to begin with, so why would they expect that it would do well in repeats!</p>
	<p>And CNW, while we know you have to take a shot at Fox each time you post, on what time frame are you basing your statement?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2006/08/04/2873/#comment-13004</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Aug 2006 08:40:33 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2006/08/04/2873/#comment-13004</guid>
					<description>Why is anyone surprised?  Why would anyone want to see re-aired interviews while they wake up?  I'd rather take the perky Robin and Company covering ACTUAL news instead of the drab/lame &quot;Best of...&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Why is anyone surprised?  Why would anyone want to see re-aired interviews while they wake up?  I&#8217;d rather take the perky Robin and Company covering ACTUAL news instead of the drab/lame &#8220;Best of&#8230;&#8221;
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Jack</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2006/08/04/2873/#comment-13002</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Aug 2006 08:29:06 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2006/08/04/2873/#comment-13002</guid>
					<description>Countdown finishes fourth...again.  Ouch!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Countdown finishes fourth&#8230;again.  Ouch!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Cable News Watcher</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2006/08/04/2873/#comment-12999</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Aug 2006 23:50:00 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2006/08/04/2873/#comment-12999</guid>
					<description>FNC's numbers remain flat while CNN still see's an increase in viewers.   Hmmm....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>FNC&#8217;s numbers remain flat while CNN still see&#8217;s an increase in viewers.   Hmmm&#8230;.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
