<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/1.5.1-alpha" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Skinner&#8217;s husband to be next NFL Commissioner&#8230;</title>
	<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2006/08/09/skinners-husband-to-be-next-nfl-commissioner/</link>
	<description>Unvarnished news &#038; opinion on cable news</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 10:13:40 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=1.5.1-alpha</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: tanne</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2006/08/09/skinners-husband-to-be-next-nfl-commissioner/#comment-13293</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Aug 2006 21:21:27 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2006/08/09/skinners-husband-to-be-next-nfl-commissioner/#comment-13293</guid>
					<description>Missy, YOU try to dispute me on FACTS? That's a laugh.

So is your accusing ME of being condescending and name calling.

And considering what idiocies get said here by some people, I have fun calling them out. So sue me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Missy, YOU try to dispute me on FACTS? That&#8217;s a laugh.</p>
	<p>So is your accusing ME of being condescending and name calling.</p>
	<p>And considering what idiocies get said here by some people, I have fun calling them out. So sue me.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Missy</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2006/08/09/skinners-husband-to-be-next-nfl-commissioner/#comment-13251</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Aug 2006 10:31:52 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2006/08/09/skinners-husband-to-be-next-nfl-commissioner/#comment-13251</guid>
					<description>tanne, I don't think so.  You're condescending and into name-calling, and are often furious with each member on a certain post.  I don't know about Lurker, but I just try to dispute you on the facts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>tanne, I don&#8217;t think so.  You&#8217;re condescending and into name-calling, and are often furious with each member on a certain post.  I don&#8217;t know about Lurker, but I just try to dispute you on the facts.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: tanne</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2006/08/09/skinners-husband-to-be-next-nfl-commissioner/#comment-13244</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Aug 2006 06:49:16 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2006/08/09/skinners-husband-to-be-next-nfl-commissioner/#comment-13244</guid>
					<description>Lurker and Missy, given that the two of you both act like rabid dogs when it comes to me, who really needs the euthanizing?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Lurker and Missy, given that the two of you both act like rabid dogs when it comes to me, who really needs the euthanizing?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Terance</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2006/08/09/skinners-husband-to-be-next-nfl-commissioner/#comment-13242</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Aug 2006 06:27:08 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2006/08/09/skinners-husband-to-be-next-nfl-commissioner/#comment-13242</guid>
					<description>I remember Jane saying someone &quot;hacked&quot; into the recipes on the website......(OR something like that) I think she meant they were deleted by someone over the net. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I remember Jane saying someone &#8220;hacked&#8221; into the recipes on the website&#8230;&#8230;(OR something like that) I think she meant they were deleted by someone over the net.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Missy</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2006/08/09/skinners-husband-to-be-next-nfl-commissioner/#comment-13233</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Aug 2006 00:09:43 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2006/08/09/skinners-husband-to-be-next-nfl-commissioner/#comment-13233</guid>
					<description>Lurker,

She doesn't capitalize her name, therefore, &quot;capital punishment&quot; is in order!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Lurker,</p>
	<p>She doesn&#8217;t capitalize her name, therefore, &#8220;capital punishment&#8221; is in order!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Lurker</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2006/08/09/skinners-husband-to-be-next-nfl-commissioner/#comment-13230</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Aug 2006 23:19:17 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2006/08/09/skinners-husband-to-be-next-nfl-commissioner/#comment-13230</guid>
					<description>If I had ANY excuse to euthanize #7, I'd do it in a heartbeat...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>If I had ANY excuse to euthanize #7, I&#8217;d do it in a heartbeat&#8230;
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: J.R.</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2006/08/09/skinners-husband-to-be-next-nfl-commissioner/#comment-13224</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Aug 2006 21:29:00 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2006/08/09/skinners-husband-to-be-next-nfl-commissioner/#comment-13224</guid>
					<description>Good for your husband Skinner.He would a great NFL Commissioner.
J.R.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Good for your husband Skinner.He would a great NFL Commissioner.<br />
J.R.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: tanne</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2006/08/09/skinners-husband-to-be-next-nfl-commissioner/#comment-13222</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Aug 2006 21:23:36 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2006/08/09/skinners-husband-to-be-next-nfl-commissioner/#comment-13222</guid>
					<description>If I were working for Fox News and had ANY excuse to quit, I'd do it in a heartbeat...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>If I were working for Fox News and had ANY excuse to quit, I&#8217;d do it in a heartbeat&#8230;
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Charles</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2006/08/09/skinners-husband-to-be-next-nfl-commissioner/#comment-13219</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Aug 2006 21:05:56 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2006/08/09/skinners-husband-to-be-next-nfl-commissioner/#comment-13219</guid>
					<description>Jane LOVES to bake. She brings in treats for the staff often, and it used to be a regular featuer on SkinnerVille where she'd make food and Shep would eat it. They even tried a send-in-your-recipe segment, but that didn't last too long.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Jane LOVES to bake. She brings in treats for the staff often, and it used to be a regular featuer on SkinnerVille where she&#8217;d make food and Shep would eat it. They even tried a send-in-your-recipe segment, but that didn&#8217;t last too long.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: OverHere</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2006/08/09/skinners-husband-to-be-next-nfl-commissioner/#comment-13216</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Aug 2006 19:10:57 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2006/08/09/skinners-husband-to-be-next-nfl-commissioner/#comment-13216</guid>
					<description>You've got to be kidding me.  Just because her husband makes money she shouldn't work too?  She worked hard for her career, but she should give it up just because her husband pulls in a big paycheck?

And Roger, I'm sure Jane bakes because she likes to bake.  It's been known to happen, some of us women actually ENJOY making things from scratch. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>You&#8217;ve got to be kidding me.  Just because her husband makes money she shouldn&#8217;t work too?  She worked hard for her career, but she should give it up just because her husband pulls in a big paycheck?</p>
	<p>And Roger, I&#8217;m sure Jane bakes because she likes to bake.  It&#8217;s been known to happen, some of us women actually ENJOY making things from scratch. :)
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: kleenex1976</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2006/08/09/skinners-husband-to-be-next-nfl-commissioner/#comment-13214</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Aug 2006 17:25:02 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2006/08/09/skinners-husband-to-be-next-nfl-commissioner/#comment-13214</guid>
					<description>With the Husband's salary does she really need to work at Fox News????</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>With the Husband&#8217;s salary does she really need to work at Fox News????
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: johnny dollar</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2006/08/09/skinners-husband-to-be-next-nfl-commissioner/#comment-13201</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Aug 2006 11:51:15 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2006/08/09/skinners-husband-to-be-next-nfl-commissioner/#comment-13201</guid>
					<description>Shep would occasionally joke with Skinner during Studio-B about her making cookies for the crew.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Shep would occasionally joke with Skinner during Studio-B about her making cookies for the crew.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Spud</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2006/08/09/skinners-husband-to-be-next-nfl-commissioner/#comment-13198</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Aug 2006 11:43:52 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2006/08/09/skinners-husband-to-be-next-nfl-commissioner/#comment-13198</guid>
					<description>huh?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>huh?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Roger</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2006/08/09/skinners-husband-to-be-next-nfl-commissioner/#comment-13183</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Aug 2006 09:43:55 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2006/08/09/skinners-husband-to-be-next-nfl-commissioner/#comment-13183</guid>
					<description>Now maybe Jane will be able to afford buying cookies rather than having to go from scratch.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Now maybe Jane will be able to afford buying cookies rather than having to go from scratch.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
