October 31, 2006
4 Comments »
TrackBack: http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2006/10/31/october-numbers-program-ranker/trackback/
RSS feed for comments on this post.
Email ICN
- Links:
- MSNBC MSN Group
- TVNewser
- NewsBlues
- CNN Observations
- Johnny Dollar's Place
- What's Happening at CNN?
- FTVLive
- The Huffington Post
- CNN Reporter
- Lost Remote
- Wall Street Fighter
- Big Head NYC
- Broadcasting & Cable
- Romenesko
- CJR Daily
- Variety's TV Section
- Mediaweek
- The Hollywood Reporter
- The TV Spy Watercooler
- TV Heads
- Editor and Publisher
- Newslab
- Daily Intelligencer
- Paid Content.org
- TV Week
- Ad Week
- Brand Week
- FishbowlDC
- FishbowlNY
- DCRTV
- TVbytheNumbers
- Big Head D.C.
- Journal-isms
- TV News Review
- TV Predictions
- TV Decoder
- Portfolio's Mixed Media
- Silicon Alley Insider
- Chickaboomer
- Talking Biz News
- 1440 Wall Street
- NewscastStudio
- Soup Cans
- Categories:
- Search:
- Archives:
- June 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
- January 2006
- December 2005
- November 2005
- October 2005
- September 2005
- August 2005
- July 2005
- June 2005
- May 2005
- April 2005
- Other:
- Meta:
Martha MacCallum’s doing very well! She actually beat the ratings for F & F!
But can someone explain the numbers for the shows shown on HN that repeat during prime time? For example, the number of 261 for Glenn Beck’s program. Is that an average of the two times that he’s shown (7 p.m. and 9 p.m. ET)? If so, shouldn’t we record that he actually has twice as many viewers (i.e., 261,000 x 2 viewings = 522,000 total viewers for prime time)?
Comment by Missy — October 31, 2006 @ 9:49 pm
I don’t think MacCallum’s doing as well as you think. I couldn’t find a september program ranker but according to the Q3 ranker Dayside (which MaCallum replaced) was at 951 and 299, ahead of F&F which was at 919 and 379. In fact Dayside was slightly ahead of Fox Online while MacCallum is slightly behind.
What’s interesting is that all the minshows that Fox has put on (Dayside, Fox Online, Live Desk) have actually done worse than regular old Fox News Live.
Comment by Steve — October 31, 2006 @ 10:29 pm
My only question about FNC is what exactly was the point of tearing apart a perfectly good block of primary news programming? Then again, Ailes did make a remark about not letting the staff get complacent at the top and the changes were probably to keep everyone on their toes and keep the network looking news.
Still, why not just run FNL from 6:00 a.m. - 12:00 p.m. Pacific Time.
Comment by Chris — November 1, 2006 @ 12:59 am
Missy, in answer to your question: Imagine if O’Reilly didn’t rerun at 11pm for those of us on the left coast. I’d venture to guess that his 8pm #s would go up; but not up as much as his 8pm and 11pm #s added together. Same should go for Beck. I’m sure HLN notices his #s in both times.
Comment by erljr — November 1, 2006 @ 8:18 pm