<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/1.5.1-alpha" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Olbermann &#8220;mock threatens&#8221; O&#8217;Reilly&#8230;apologizes?</title>
	<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2006/11/16/olbermann-ridicules-oreillyapologizes/</link>
	<description>Unvarnished news &#038; opinion on cable news</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 09:26:31 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=1.5.1-alpha</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Missy</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2006/11/16/olbermann-ridicules-oreillyapologizes/#comment-19382</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Nov 2006 14:52:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2006/11/16/olbermann-ridicules-oreillyapologizes/#comment-19382</guid>
					<description>Another mistake.  &quot;The Factor&quot;!

I'm doing too many things right now.  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Another mistake.  &#8220;The Factor&#8221;!</p>
	<p>I&#8217;m doing too many things right now.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Missy</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2006/11/16/olbermann-ridicules-oreillyapologizes/#comment-19380</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Nov 2006 14:33:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2006/11/16/olbermann-ridicules-oreillyapologizes/#comment-19380</guid>
					<description>s/b &quot;blatantly&quot;

Also, I apologize to the other posters for my use of caps in the above post.  But it is infuriating to see someone post such untruths, and to think that we are stupid enough to ignore actual ratings data and believe him instead!

Sorry, &quot;*&quot;, we've all been here a long time and can easily read ratings.  And you are wrong.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>s/b &#8220;blatantly&#8221;</p>
	<p>Also, I apologize to the other posters for my use of caps in the above post.  But it is infuriating to see someone post such untruths, and to think that we are stupid enough to ignore actual ratings data and believe him instead!</p>
	<p>Sorry, &#8220;*&#8221;, we&#8217;ve all been here a long time and can easily read ratings.  And you are wrong.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Missy</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2006/11/16/olbermann-ridicules-oreillyapologizes/#comment-19379</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Nov 2006 14:26:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2006/11/16/olbermann-ridicules-oreillyapologizes/#comment-19379</guid>
					<description>* (is that how we are refer to you?),

O'Reilly has CONSTANTLY stated that he is NOT a journalist, and that his program consists of NEWS ANALYSIS!!!!!

How can you POSSIBLY stated that Olbermann's ratings are higher than O'Reilly's?  O'Reilly 4 a.m. THIRD broadcoast of the factor even beats Keith's prime time showing.

I love how you Olbermaniacs can write such eloquent justifications for your hero, while blatently ignoring well publicized facts and data that would prove you wrong.  If you want to make remarks about ratings, PLEASE REFRAIN FROM OPINION, and INSTEAD, CITE SOME DATA TO MAKE YOUR POINT!!!!

And another thing.  Exactly what has O'Reilly said that is not true?  Tell us SPECIFICALLY what you're in a snit about.  

Finally, what about this education thing?  I have a feeling that Keith's fans are probably like John Kerry - they give the illusion of being intellectual, but when scrutinized, may in fact even be less educated and intelligent than their more conservative peers.  Remember how Bush was treated as an intellectual inferior throughout the last Presidential campaign?  We then find out that Kerry's grades were WORSE than those of President Bush.  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>* (is that how we are refer to you?),</p>
	<p>O&#8217;Reilly has CONSTANTLY stated that he is NOT a journalist, and that his program consists of NEWS ANALYSIS!!!!!</p>
	<p>How can you POSSIBLY stated that Olbermann&#8217;s ratings are higher than O&#8217;Reilly&#8217;s?  O&#8217;Reilly 4 a.m. THIRD broadcoast of the factor even beats Keith&#8217;s prime time showing.</p>
	<p>I love how you Olbermaniacs can write such eloquent justifications for your hero, while blatently ignoring well publicized facts and data that would prove you wrong.  If you want to make remarks about ratings, PLEASE REFRAIN FROM OPINION, and INSTEAD, CITE SOME DATA TO MAKE YOUR POINT!!!!</p>
	<p>And another thing.  Exactly what has O&#8217;Reilly said that is not true?  Tell us SPECIFICALLY what you&#8217;re in a snit about.  </p>
	<p>Finally, what about this education thing?  I have a feeling that Keith&#8217;s fans are probably like John Kerry - they give the illusion of being intellectual, but when scrutinized, may in fact even be less educated and intelligent than their more conservative peers.  Remember how Bush was treated as an intellectual inferior throughout the last Presidential campaign?  We then find out that Kerry&#8217;s grades were WORSE than those of President Bush.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: johnny dollar</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2006/11/16/olbermann-ridicules-oreillyapologizes/#comment-19342</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Nov 2006 21:39:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2006/11/16/olbermann-ridicules-oreillyapologizes/#comment-19342</guid>
					<description>Well, Inside Cable News posts the ratings night after night. And the fact that you claim that Olbermann has higher ratings than O'Reilly tells us all we need to know about the Gullibility Factor of Olbypologists.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Well, Inside Cable News posts the ratings night after night. And the fact that you claim that Olbermann has higher ratings than O&#8217;Reilly tells us all we need to know about the Gullibility Factor of Olbypologists.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: *</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2006/11/16/olbermann-ridicules-oreillyapologizes/#comment-19339</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Nov 2006 18:50:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2006/11/16/olbermann-ridicules-oreillyapologizes/#comment-19339</guid>
					<description>Perhaps the reason Olberman displays such outrage regarding people like O'Reilly is that the O'Reillys of the world mask themselves as actual journalists when in reality they utilize many forms of deceptive reporting to push an agenda - at this point the Republican GOP talking points with no attention to actual truth in reporting.  When I need a good laugh I tune into O'Reilly.  Unfortunately my smile usually fades quickly when I realize how many people actually believe what he is saying to be true, however that's why a high majority of O'Reilly's audience is comprised of viewers with a very low level education.  BTW - for anyone who is interested - O'Reilly's ratings  are actually LOWER than Olberman's - like many of O'Reilly's claims, just because he  says it DOESN'T make it true. 

As someone who has studied journalism and recognizes many of the very common marketing tactics used by O'Reilly  to convince people of things that are simply not true I am heartened to see an actual real journalist like Keith Olberman being televised.  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Perhaps the reason Olberman displays such outrage regarding people like O&#8217;Reilly is that the O&#8217;Reillys of the world mask themselves as actual journalists when in reality they utilize many forms of deceptive reporting to push an agenda - at this point the Republican GOP talking points with no attention to actual truth in reporting.  When I need a good laugh I tune into O&#8217;Reilly.  Unfortunately my smile usually fades quickly when I realize how many people actually believe what he is saying to be true, however that&#8217;s why a high majority of O&#8217;Reilly&#8217;s audience is comprised of viewers with a very low level education.  BTW - for anyone who is interested - O&#8217;Reilly&#8217;s ratings  are actually LOWER than Olberman&#8217;s - like many of O&#8217;Reilly&#8217;s claims, just because he  says it DOESN&#8217;T make it true. </p>
	<p>As someone who has studied journalism and recognizes many of the very common marketing tactics used by O&#8217;Reilly  to convince people of things that are simply not true I am heartened to see an actual real journalist like Keith Olberman being televised.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: jerziegrl</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2006/11/16/olbermann-ridicules-oreillyapologizes/#comment-19315</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Nov 2006 12:46:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2006/11/16/olbermann-ridicules-oreillyapologizes/#comment-19315</guid>
					<description>Win and Emmy?  Seriously?  That is about the funniest thing I have heard since.....I don't know when. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Win and Emmy?  Seriously?  That is about the funniest thing I have heard since&#8230;..I don&#8217;t know when.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Elanie</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2006/11/16/olbermann-ridicules-oreillyapologizes/#comment-19303</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Nov 2006 00:33:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2006/11/16/olbermann-ridicules-oreillyapologizes/#comment-19303</guid>
					<description>We love KO's show.  We never miss an episode!  We highly recommend him and think he should win an Emmy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>We love KO&#8217;s show.  We never miss an episode!  We highly recommend him and think he should win an Emmy.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Goldfish</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2006/11/16/olbermann-ridicules-oreillyapologizes/#comment-19298</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Nov 2006 20:17:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2006/11/16/olbermann-ridicules-oreillyapologizes/#comment-19298</guid>
					<description>If you don't like the discussion, then why are you here, Colleen? </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>If you don&#8217;t like the discussion, then why are you here, Colleen?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: anon</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2006/11/16/olbermann-ridicules-oreillyapologizes/#comment-19297</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Nov 2006 20:01:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2006/11/16/olbermann-ridicules-oreillyapologizes/#comment-19297</guid>
					<description>Olbermann has taken the hour he spends on Patrick's show daily and turned it into a lovefest for himself.  Just a few weeks ago he had his girlfriend on the show in a speaking role.  

I really don't think sports fans care about Olbermann's Prada and Marc Jacobs purchases any more than they do about his O'Reilly obsession.  It's disgusting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Olbermann has taken the hour he spends on Patrick&#8217;s show daily and turned it into a lovefest for himself.  Just a few weeks ago he had his girlfriend on the show in a speaking role.  </p>
	<p>I really don&#8217;t think sports fans care about Olbermann&#8217;s Prada and Marc Jacobs purchases any more than they do about his O&#8217;Reilly obsession.  It&#8217;s disgusting.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: colleen</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2006/11/16/olbermann-ridicules-oreillyapologizes/#comment-19296</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Nov 2006 19:57:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2006/11/16/olbermann-ridicules-oreillyapologizes/#comment-19296</guid>
					<description>don't you people have anything more intelligent to talk about?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>don&#8217;t you people have anything more intelligent to talk about?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Goldfish</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2006/11/16/olbermann-ridicules-oreillyapologizes/#comment-19293</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Nov 2006 19:12:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2006/11/16/olbermann-ridicules-oreillyapologizes/#comment-19293</guid>
					<description>KO's &quot;mock&quot; threat to attack O'Reilly was about as humorous as the mock anthrax threat against KO. Which is to say not funny at all. KO claimed that he was letting go of the BOR feud. Doesn't look that way at all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>KO&#8217;s &#8220;mock&#8221; threat to attack O&#8217;Reilly was about as humorous as the mock anthrax threat against KO. Which is to say not funny at all. KO claimed that he was letting go of the BOR feud. Doesn&#8217;t look that way at all.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: spiffo</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2006/11/16/olbermann-ridicules-oreillyapologizes/#comment-19279</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Nov 2006 15:14:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2006/11/16/olbermann-ridicules-oreillyapologizes/#comment-19279</guid>
					<description>Yea, he's like a tree falling in the forest, with nobody around.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Yea, he&#8217;s like a tree falling in the forest, with nobody around.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: eddiebear</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2006/11/16/olbermann-ridicules-oreillyapologizes/#comment-19278</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Nov 2006 14:52:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2006/11/16/olbermann-ridicules-oreillyapologizes/#comment-19278</guid>
					<description>Olby has taken to calling himself the Modern Day Murrow AND Thomas Beckett. Funny. I don't recall those two guys threatening to injure somebody else (joke or not). </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Olby has taken to calling himself the Modern Day Murrow AND Thomas Beckett. Funny. I don&#8217;t recall those two guys threatening to injure somebody else (joke or not).
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: badbilly</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2006/11/16/olbermann-ridicules-oreillyapologizes/#comment-19275</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Nov 2006 14:11:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2006/11/16/olbermann-ridicules-oreillyapologizes/#comment-19275</guid>
					<description>The Olbermann v. BOR feud is pretty much a one-way conflict.  Im not sure if Orielly even knows Dr. Orange even exists on cable anymore.  Question: If Olbermann criticizes BOR or makes his &quot;Special Comment&quot; and nobody watches his show, does he really matter?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>The Olbermann v. BOR feud is pretty much a one-way conflict.  Im not sure if Orielly even knows Dr. Orange even exists on cable anymore.  Question: If Olbermann criticizes BOR or makes his &#8220;Special Comment&#8221; and nobody watches his show, does he really matter?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: erljr</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2006/11/16/olbermann-ridicules-oreillyapologizes/#comment-19273</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Nov 2006 14:09:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2006/11/16/olbermann-ridicules-oreillyapologizes/#comment-19273</guid>
					<description>Thanks Johnny. I just knew it couldn't be true. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Thanks Johnny. I just knew it couldn&#8217;t be true.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Caufield</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2006/11/16/olbermann-ridicules-oreillyapologizes/#comment-19271</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Nov 2006 13:40:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2006/11/16/olbermann-ridicules-oreillyapologizes/#comment-19271</guid>
					<description>Spiffo, the short answer is that you can't--that's why Olbermann's ratings ironically never come close to O'Reilly's.  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Spiffo, the short answer is that you can&#8217;t&#8211;that&#8217;s why Olbermann&#8217;s ratings ironically never come close to O&#8217;Reilly&#8217;s.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: spiffo</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2006/11/16/olbermann-ridicules-oreillyapologizes/#comment-19270</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Nov 2006 13:14:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2006/11/16/olbermann-ridicules-oreillyapologizes/#comment-19270</guid>
					<description>How can you build an entire program out of criticizing another program, on another network?  This schtick is going to start to wear thin with the few viewers he has.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>How can you build an entire program out of criticizing another program, on another network?  This schtick is going to start to wear thin with the few viewers he has.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: johnny dollar</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2006/11/16/olbermann-ridicules-oreillyapologizes/#comment-19269</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Nov 2006 13:12:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2006/11/16/olbermann-ridicules-oreillyapologizes/#comment-19269</guid>
					<description>&amp;gt; anyone know how long it’s been since he mentioned O’Reilly on Countdown?

How about last night? Olbermann let go of attacking O'Reilly? That lasted all of about five hours.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>&gt; anyone know how long it’s been since he mentioned O’Reilly on Countdown?</p>
	<p>How about last night? Olbermann let go of attacking O&#8217;Reilly? That lasted all of about five hours.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Robert Cox</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2006/11/16/olbermann-ridicules-oreillyapologizes/#comment-19266</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Nov 2006 13:05:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2006/11/16/olbermann-ridicules-oreillyapologizes/#comment-19266</guid>
					<description>Spud,

As a point of order, Olbermann did not apologize for &quot;ridiculing&quot; O'Reilly.  He apologizing for joking that if and O'Reilly were competing on Dancing with the Stars that he would cut O'Reilly's hamstring with a surgeon's knife (in the apology he said &quot;pen knife&quot; which is not what he said) and that he would &quot;do a Nancy Kerrigan&quot; on him (i.e., hire someone to smash O'Reilly in the knee with a metal rod).

While it is not clear whether Olbermann's on-air correction/apology was his own decision or one forced on him by ESPN, it is certainly clear that this was yet another example of Olbypocrisy - in the past week he has criticized Laura Ingram for joking on the radio that &quot;we all&quot; (her listeners) should call a Democratic Voter Hotline on election day (a form of DoS attack) and Michelle Malkin on the specious grounds that she (and Ingraham and Ann Coulter) was culpable for the actions of a California man who sent a &quot;fake anthrax&quot; letter to Olbermann because he may have written that he &quot;worshipped Malkin&quot; on FreeRepublic.com.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Spud,</p>
	<p>As a point of order, Olbermann did not apologize for &#8220;ridiculing&#8221; O&#8217;Reilly.  He apologizing for joking that if and O&#8217;Reilly were competing on Dancing with the Stars that he would cut O&#8217;Reilly&#8217;s hamstring with a surgeon&#8217;s knife (in the apology he said &#8220;pen knife&#8221; which is not what he said) and that he would &#8220;do a Nancy Kerrigan&#8221; on him (i.e., hire someone to smash O&#8217;Reilly in the knee with a metal rod).</p>
	<p>While it is not clear whether Olbermann&#8217;s on-air correction/apology was his own decision or one forced on him by ESPN, it is certainly clear that this was yet another example of Olbypocrisy - in the past week he has criticized Laura Ingram for joking on the radio that &#8220;we all&#8221; (her listeners) should call a Democratic Voter Hotline on election day (a form of DoS attack) and Michelle Malkin on the specious grounds that she (and Ingraham and Ann Coulter) was culpable for the actions of a California man who sent a &#8220;fake anthrax&#8221; letter to Olbermann because he may have written that he &#8220;worshipped Malkin&#8221; on FreeRepublic.com.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: erljr</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2006/11/16/olbermann-ridicules-oreillyapologizes/#comment-19265</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Nov 2006 13:04:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2006/11/16/olbermann-ridicules-oreillyapologizes/#comment-19265</guid>
					<description>Olbermann said, when they came back from commercial, that some people had complained. Could have been listeners, could have people at ESPN. 
Kudos to Mr. Cox for running the audio, and especially for running so much of it to put it all in context. Too often these days, a soundbite distorts the truth. Not on Olbermannwatch. 
Olbermann said he had decided to grow up and let go of the O'Reilly bashing. I haven't watched Olbermann for a while; anyone know how long it's been since he mentioned O'Reilly on Countdown? If it's true, kudos to Mr. Olbermann for that.
And kudos to Mr. O'Reilly for taking on Fox. I'm sure Mr. Ailes would praise him too. When I disagree with someone in my family, I'm not shy about letting it be known. And since Ailes added Fox to his resume, I'm sure some of FNC's audience has been lost to Fox, FX, the History Channel, and others which are now advertised heavily on FNC. 
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Olbermann said, when they came back from commercial, that some people had complained. Could have been listeners, could have people at ESPN.<br />
Kudos to Mr. Cox for running the audio, and especially for running so much of it to put it all in context. Too often these days, a soundbite distorts the truth. Not on Olbermannwatch.<br />
Olbermann said he had decided to grow up and let go of the O&#8217;Reilly bashing. I haven&#8217;t watched Olbermann for a while; anyone know how long it&#8217;s been since he mentioned O&#8217;Reilly on Countdown? If it&#8217;s true, kudos to Mr. Olbermann for that.<br />
And kudos to Mr. O&#8217;Reilly for taking on Fox. I&#8217;m sure Mr. Ailes would praise him too. When I disagree with someone in my family, I&#8217;m not shy about letting it be known. And since Ailes added Fox to his resume, I&#8217;m sure some of FNC&#8217;s audience has been lost to Fox, FX, the History Channel, and others which are now advertised heavily on FNC.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: William</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2006/11/16/olbermann-ridicules-oreillyapologizes/#comment-19259</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Nov 2006 11:21:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2006/11/16/olbermann-ridicules-oreillyapologizes/#comment-19259</guid>
					<description>On his program, Keith has shown PLENTY of righteous indignation anytime one of his professed enemies has made a similar joke. He rarely passes up a chance to criticize someone else for saying similar things.  

I don't know whether he was forced to apologize or not, but in his case, the apology was warranted.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>On his program, Keith has shown PLENTY of righteous indignation anytime one of his professed enemies has made a similar joke. He rarely passes up a chance to criticize someone else for saying similar things.  </p>
	<p>I don&#8217;t know whether he was forced to apologize or not, but in his case, the apology was warranted.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: cella</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2006/11/16/olbermann-ridicules-oreillyapologizes/#comment-19257</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Nov 2006 10:43:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2006/11/16/olbermann-ridicules-oreillyapologizes/#comment-19257</guid>
					<description>Maybe those great sport icons, Keith Olbermann and O.J. Simpson could have a radio show of their own.
I good title might be O.J. and K.O. Ughhhhhhhhhh!
The two worst people in the world.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Maybe those great sport icons, Keith Olbermann and O.J. Simpson could have a radio show of their own.<br />
I good title might be O.J. and K.O. Ughhhhhhhhhh!<br />
The two worst people in the world.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Buck</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2006/11/16/olbermann-ridicules-oreillyapologizes/#comment-19256</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Nov 2006 10:02:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2006/11/16/olbermann-ridicules-oreillyapologizes/#comment-19256</guid>
					<description>Olbermann is truly pathetic and I'm pretty sure listeners tuning in to hear him and Patrick talk sports don't want to be included in Keith's personal feud with O'Reilly. 

 

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Olbermann is truly pathetic and I&#8217;m pretty sure listeners tuning in to hear him and Patrick talk sports don&#8217;t want to be included in Keith&#8217;s personal feud with O&#8217;Reilly.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: TT</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2006/11/16/olbermann-ridicules-oreillyapologizes/#comment-19255</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Nov 2006 08:42:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2006/11/16/olbermann-ridicules-oreillyapologizes/#comment-19255</guid>
					<description>Sounds like ESPN isn't interested in letting their hosts use their airtime for personal attacks and vendettas. Maybe MSNBC should take note.  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Sounds like ESPN isn&#8217;t interested in letting their hosts use their airtime for personal attacks and vendettas. Maybe MSNBC should take note.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
