Comments on: 2006 Numbers: Newspaper reax… http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/01/04/2006-numbers-newspaper-reax/ Unvarnished news & opinion on cable news Thu, 23 May 2013 10:59:33 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=1.5.1-alpha by: Mr A http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/01/04/2006-numbers-newspaper-reax/#comment-21893 Thu, 04 Jan 2007 16:47:27 +0000 http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/01/04/2006-numbers-newspaper-reax/#comment-21893 so what? They are doing well after so many years in the basement - and good luck to them. so what? They are doing well after so many years in the basement - and good luck to them.

]]> by: Missy http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/01/04/2006-numbers-newspaper-reax/#comment-21886 Thu, 04 Jan 2007 16:02:53 +0000 http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/01/04/2006-numbers-newspaper-reax/#comment-21886 As pointed out elsewhere on this site, MSNBC finished 35th out of all of the cable networks (Fox was eighth). While MSNBC is trending upward, how can the media continue to laud this trend as such great success? As discussed here many times, it's easy to see large percentage increases when the raw numbers are low to begin with. As pointed out elsewhere on this site, MSNBC finished 35th out of all of the cable networks (Fox was eighth).

While MSNBC is trending upward, how can the media continue to laud this trend as such great success? As discussed here many times, it’s easy to see large percentage increases when the raw numbers are low to begin with.

]]>