<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/1.5.1-alpha" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Steve Capus on the state of the NBC News Division</title>
	<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/01/24/steve-capus-on-the-state-of-the-nbc-news-division/</link>
	<description>Unvarnished news &#038; opinion on cable news</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 09:30:20 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=1.5.1-alpha</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: erljr</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/01/24/steve-capus-on-the-state-of-the-nbc-news-division/#comment-23693</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jan 2007 05:44:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/01/24/steve-capus-on-the-state-of-the-nbc-news-division/#comment-23693</guid>
					<description>The unwriten rule:
Since Phil Donahue's ouster, MSNBC has only canceled shows that were, on a regular basis, either (1)getting less than 200,000 viewers, or (2)getting less than 100,000 in the demo. That was Tucker when he got moved to daytime; but that's not Tucker today. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>The unwriten rule:<br />
Since Phil Donahue&#8217;s ouster, MSNBC has only canceled shows that were, on a regular basis, either (1)getting less than 200,000 viewers, or (2)getting less than 100,000 in the demo. That was Tucker when he got moved to daytime; but that&#8217;s not Tucker today.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Terance</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/01/24/steve-capus-on-the-state-of-the-nbc-news-division/#comment-23617</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2007 10:36:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/01/24/steve-capus-on-the-state-of-the-nbc-news-division/#comment-23617</guid>
					<description>I think its about time MSNBC gives someone else a chance. Tucker has been around for a while and he fails to make an impact.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I think its about time MSNBC gives someone else a chance. Tucker has been around for a while and he fails to make an impact.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: cella</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/01/24/steve-capus-on-the-state-of-the-nbc-news-division/#comment-23615</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2007 10:22:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/01/24/steve-capus-on-the-state-of-the-nbc-news-division/#comment-23615</guid>
					<description>Dan Abrams makes regular visits to Tucker's show to discuss the Duke case. That seems to indicate to me that he supports Tucker.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Dan Abrams makes regular visits to Tucker&#8217;s show to discuss the Duke case. That seems to indicate to me that he supports Tucker.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Mike Beckham</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/01/24/steve-capus-on-the-state-of-the-nbc-news-division/#comment-23608</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2007 07:26:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/01/24/steve-capus-on-the-state-of-the-nbc-news-division/#comment-23608</guid>
					<description>Tucker should be canned, however MSNBC had a great year last year and should continue in 2007.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Tucker should be canned, however MSNBC had a great year last year and should continue in 2007.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Spud</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/01/24/steve-capus-on-the-state-of-the-nbc-news-division/#comment-23584</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jan 2007 22:23:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/01/24/steve-capus-on-the-state-of-the-nbc-news-division/#comment-23584</guid>
					<description>Not really. Capus was highlighting Prime Time and Carlson isn't part of that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Not really. Capus was highlighting Prime Time and Carlson isn&#8217;t part of that.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: elmonica</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/01/24/steve-capus-on-the-state-of-the-nbc-news-division/#comment-23581</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jan 2007 22:10:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/01/24/steve-capus-on-the-state-of-the-nbc-news-division/#comment-23581</guid>
					<description>I should of phrased that better Keyser. I just meant that with his poor ratings and the fact he isn't mentioned in the memo sees to indicate his time is short lived.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I should of phrased that better Keyser. I just meant that with his poor ratings and the fact he isn&#8217;t mentioned in the memo sees to indicate his time is short lived.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Keyser Soze</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/01/24/steve-capus-on-the-state-of-the-nbc-news-division/#comment-23576</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jan 2007 21:40:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/01/24/steve-capus-on-the-state-of-the-nbc-news-division/#comment-23576</guid>
					<description>Because Tucker is not mentioned, doesn't mean he got the boot, ... does it? He was live-blogging the SOTU last night... But then again?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Because Tucker is not mentioned, doesn&#8217;t mean he got the boot, &#8230; does it? He was live-blogging the SOTU last night&#8230; But then again?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: elmonica</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/01/24/steve-capus-on-the-state-of-the-nbc-news-division/#comment-23565</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jan 2007 20:30:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/01/24/steve-capus-on-the-state-of-the-nbc-news-division/#comment-23565</guid>
					<description>It is about time Tucker got the boot.  Maybe we should begin speculating on who would be a good replacement for him.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>It is about time Tucker got the boot.  Maybe we should begin speculating on who would be a good replacement for him.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
