<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/1.5.1-alpha" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Citigroup and Bartiromo together again: Bad judgement or much ado about nothing?</title>
	<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/02/26/citigroup-and-bartiromo-together-again-bad-judgement-or-much-ado-about-nothing/</link>
	<description>Unvarnished news &#038; opinion on cable news</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 09:59:26 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=1.5.1-alpha</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Don</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/02/26/citigroup-and-bartiromo-together-again-bad-judgement-or-much-ado-about-nothing/#comment-27025</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Feb 2007 02:04:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/02/26/citigroup-and-bartiromo-together-again-bad-judgement-or-much-ado-about-nothing/#comment-27025</guid>
					<description>Just seems like a dumb thing to do.  Look, I don't think she carries a bias (I watched, didn't seem slanted) - but sometimes you have to concern yourself with perception.

Would this have been OK in a year? Probably. Right now? Seems odd...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Just seems like a dumb thing to do.  Look, I don&#8217;t think she carries a bias (I watched, didn&#8217;t seem slanted) - but sometimes you have to concern yourself with perception.</p>
	<p>Would this have been OK in a year? Probably. Right now? Seems odd&#8230;
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Bob</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/02/26/citigroup-and-bartiromo-together-again-bad-judgement-or-much-ado-about-nothing/#comment-27024</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Feb 2007 01:35:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/02/26/citigroup-and-bartiromo-together-again-bad-judgement-or-much-ado-about-nothing/#comment-27024</guid>
					<description>This interview is not exactly good for public relations.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>This interview is not exactly good for public relations.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: David</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/02/26/citigroup-and-bartiromo-together-again-bad-judgement-or-much-ado-about-nothing/#comment-27015</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Feb 2007 23:39:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/02/26/citigroup-and-bartiromo-together-again-bad-judgement-or-much-ado-about-nothing/#comment-27015</guid>
					<description>First off, Spud, I think you meant to say &quot;...wasn’t with anyone who currently works at Citigroup...&quot;  Unless Maria Bartiromo's been fired and you had the news first, that is. :-)  But no, Bartiromo shouldn't have had anything to do with this interview.

How many times has a CNBC anchor or reporter said that some executive, investor or politician has an &quot;appearance of impropriety&quot;?  As far as I'm concerned, CNBC just forfeited its right to use that phrase in discussing anyone, anytime, for any reason.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>First off, Spud, I think you meant to say &#8220;&#8230;wasn’t with anyone who currently works at Citigroup&#8230;&#8221;  Unless Maria Bartiromo&#8217;s been fired and you had the news first, that is. :-)  But no, Bartiromo shouldn&#8217;t have had anything to do with this interview.</p>
	<p>How many times has a CNBC anchor or reporter said that some executive, investor or politician has an &#8220;appearance of impropriety&#8221;?  As far as I&#8217;m concerned, CNBC just forfeited its right to use that phrase in discussing anyone, anytime, for any reason.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
