<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/1.5.1-alpha" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Verdict in Scooter Libby Trial&#8230;</title>
	<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/03/06/verdict-in-scooter-libby-trial/</link>
	<description>Unvarnished news &#038; opinion on cable news</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 02:54:14 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=1.5.1-alpha</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: erljr</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/03/06/verdict-in-scooter-libby-trial/#comment-27933</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2007 20:24:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/03/06/verdict-in-scooter-libby-trial/#comment-27933</guid>
					<description>I agree with most of what you said STP. And, yes, it is promoted as the #1 business show on cable. But consider this: in the week before the big drop in the market, his show was bumped twice for Fox News Live &amp;amp; Anna Nicole. I don't think that was all his decision. And on the days he wasn't bumped, he did do lots of Anna Nicole. 
Secondly, consider this: today, while the Jessica Lunsford verdict was being read, everything else was bumped on CNN, FNC, and MSNBC. But CNBC went on with the Money Honey show, and no Jessica. 
If FBC (or FBN) were going today, I think they would have kept their regular programming going. When it does happen, we will find out what Cavuto's world really looks like.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I agree with most of what you said STP. And, yes, it is promoted as the #1 business show on cable. But consider this: in the week before the big drop in the market, his show was bumped twice for Fox News Live &amp; Anna Nicole. I don&#8217;t think that was all his decision. And on the days he wasn&#8217;t bumped, he did do lots of Anna Nicole.<br />
Secondly, consider this: today, while the Jessica Lunsford verdict was being read, everything else was bumped on CNN, FNC, and MSNBC. But CNBC went on with the Money Honey show, and no Jessica.<br />
If FBC (or FBN) were going today, I think they would have kept their regular programming going. When it does happen, we will find out what Cavuto&#8217;s world really looks like.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: STP</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/03/06/verdict-in-scooter-libby-trial/#comment-27885</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2007 11:23:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/03/06/verdict-in-scooter-libby-trial/#comment-27885</guid>
					<description>Cavuto made a conscientious decision to put Libby first over the discussing the up market. This is hardly the first time Cavuto has chosen to go political instead of business on his show thus my &quot;overriding need&quot; comment. As Steve so aptly pointed out, Cavuto's show IS considered the #1 business show on cable. The big business news yesterday was the large market gain and the reasons for that and its affects should have been covered first.

But, unfortunately, for someone interested in actual business news, that wasn't the lead segment. For a guy who is supposed to be business perspective oriented, even Cavuto couldn't put a business spin on the Libby verdict in his opening segment. Cavuto put politics first yesterday and that was a mistake in my opinion. 

If Cavuto wants to have a show that covers &quot;His World&quot;, then, as you said, it's not a business show. On that we can agree. In reality it's just another political/cultural analysis show with just enough straight-up business segments tossed in to enable it to be categorized as a &quot;business&quot; show.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Cavuto made a conscientious decision to put Libby first over the discussing the up market. This is hardly the first time Cavuto has chosen to go political instead of business on his show thus my &#8220;overriding need&#8221; comment. As Steve so aptly pointed out, Cavuto&#8217;s show IS considered the #1 business show on cable. The big business news yesterday was the large market gain and the reasons for that and its affects should have been covered first.</p>
	<p>But, unfortunately, for someone interested in actual business news, that wasn&#8217;t the lead segment. For a guy who is supposed to be business perspective oriented, even Cavuto couldn&#8217;t put a business spin on the Libby verdict in his opening segment. Cavuto put politics first yesterday and that was a mistake in my opinion. </p>
	<p>If Cavuto wants to have a show that covers &#8220;His World&#8221;, then, as you said, it&#8217;s not a business show. On that we can agree. In reality it&#8217;s just another political/cultural analysis show with just enough straight-up business segments tossed in to enable it to be categorized as a &#8220;business&#8221; show.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Steve</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/03/06/verdict-in-scooter-libby-trial/#comment-27873</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2007 03:11:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/03/06/verdict-in-scooter-libby-trial/#comment-27873</guid>
					<description>Somebody should tell fox pr that Your World isn't a business show considering that they call it the #1 business show on cable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Somebody should tell fox pr that Your World isn&#8217;t a business show considering that they call it the #1 business show on cable.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: erljr</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/03/06/verdict-in-scooter-libby-trial/#comment-27870</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2007 00:53:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/03/06/verdict-in-scooter-libby-trial/#comment-27870</guid>
					<description>STP - Cavuto leading with the Libby verdict is not a symptom of &quot;his overriding need to cover the political over the business.&quot; Cavuto has explained in countless interviews that &quot;Your World&quot; is just that - his world - the news from a business perspective. It's not a business show; it's the news as Cavuto sees it. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>STP - Cavuto leading with the Libby verdict is not a symptom of &#8220;his overriding need to cover the political over the business.&#8221; Cavuto has explained in countless interviews that &#8220;Your World&#8221; is just that - his world - the news from a business perspective. It&#8217;s not a business show; it&#8217;s the news as Cavuto sees it.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Aunt Mary</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/03/06/verdict-in-scooter-libby-trial/#comment-27858</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 21:56:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/03/06/verdict-in-scooter-libby-trial/#comment-27858</guid>
					<description>Shaun -- Thanks for the hat suggestion however, 65% of my viewing comes from MSNBC. I have watched Chris Matthews since the O.J. days and enjoy his Sunday show &quot;The Chris Matthews Show&quot;.   I loved watching Countdown for years but when Olbermann lost it last summer and became a &quot;LEFT WING NUT CASE&quot; I changed to O'Reilly.  I know you will say O'Reilly is the same in the other direction but, O'Reilly has guests that will give it right back to him. I do not like extreme on left or right, if the other opinion is not also given, it is bad for our country.  Anyway, I have thought for sometime that Olbermann gets more posts on ICN than any other talking head -- just felt like Spud cleared that up for me when he said he posts what is relayed to him or he has witnessed. I think Olbermann's team is manipulating the press and it is working for them. One would think with all the free press that he gets that he would be the most watched show on TV. I meant no disrespect for Spud, I think he does a good job wording his posts in a good left/right balance. That is why I read this blog, people strongly state their opinion but &quot;FEW&quot; are &quot;CONSTANTLY&quot; extreme. I get both sides and occasionally it changes my view on a subject.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Shaun &#8212; Thanks for the hat suggestion however, 65% of my viewing comes from MSNBC. I have watched Chris Matthews since the O.J. days and enjoy his Sunday show &#8220;The Chris Matthews Show&#8221;.   I loved watching Countdown for years but when Olbermann lost it last summer and became a &#8220;LEFT WING NUT CASE&#8221; I changed to O&#8217;Reilly.  I know you will say O&#8217;Reilly is the same in the other direction but, O&#8217;Reilly has guests that will give it right back to him. I do not like extreme on left or right, if the other opinion is not also given, it is bad for our country.  Anyway, I have thought for sometime that Olbermann gets more posts on ICN than any other talking head &#8212; just felt like Spud cleared that up for me when he said he posts what is relayed to him or he has witnessed. I think Olbermann&#8217;s team is manipulating the press and it is working for them. One would think with all the free press that he gets that he would be the most watched show on TV. I meant no disrespect for Spud, I think he does a good job wording his posts in a good left/right balance. That is why I read this blog, people strongly state their opinion but &#8220;FEW&#8221; are &#8220;CONSTANTLY&#8221; extreme. I get both sides and occasionally it changes my view on a subject.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Ira</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/03/06/verdict-in-scooter-libby-trial/#comment-27856</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 21:10:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/03/06/verdict-in-scooter-libby-trial/#comment-27856</guid>
					<description>brettfan:  I hate to correct you by a criticism of Fox but last night, IMO surprisingly, Greta spent more than half her show on Anna Nicole Smith.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>brettfan:  I hate to correct you by a criticism of Fox but last night, IMO surprisingly, Greta spent more than half her show on Anna Nicole Smith.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: STP</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/03/06/verdict-in-scooter-libby-trial/#comment-27846</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 19:50:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/03/06/verdict-in-scooter-libby-trial/#comment-27846</guid>
					<description>LOL, Alice. A colleague and I had a bet regarding Cavuto's show today. I said that Cavuto would lead off with the Libby verdict story despite its being basically a non-business story while a colleague said no, that he'd have to lead off with the main reason the market was up so much, the lower yen and the carry trade (also, Paulson's remarks on mortgage defaults helped).

I won that bet when Cavuto chose to cover the Libby verdict as the opening story saying the market was up &quot;in spite&quot; of the Libby verdict. LOL! Needless to say, my colleague, a financial market guru, was taken aback that Libby was Cavuto's lead story and now he owes me a steak dinner.

Cavuto is nothing if not predictable. I'll be thanking him and his overriding need to cover the political over the business as I enjoy my meal tomorrow. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>LOL, Alice. A colleague and I had a bet regarding Cavuto&#8217;s show today. I said that Cavuto would lead off with the Libby verdict story despite its being basically a non-business story while a colleague said no, that he&#8217;d have to lead off with the main reason the market was up so much, the lower yen and the carry trade (also, Paulson&#8217;s remarks on mortgage defaults helped).</p>
	<p>I won that bet when Cavuto chose to cover the Libby verdict as the opening story saying the market was up &#8220;in spite&#8221; of the Libby verdict. LOL! Needless to say, my colleague, a financial market guru, was taken aback that Libby was Cavuto&#8217;s lead story and now he owes me a steak dinner.</p>
	<p>Cavuto is nothing if not predictable. I&#8217;ll be thanking him and his overriding need to cover the political over the business as I enjoy my meal tomorrow.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: brettfan</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/03/06/verdict-in-scooter-libby-trial/#comment-27842</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 19:14:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/03/06/verdict-in-scooter-libby-trial/#comment-27842</guid>
					<description>correction: meant to say one will get a headache from all the repetitive talk on Libby cuase they will have nothing new after a point and be repeating the  talking points. Why tv is not meant to watch 24/7 because it is very repetitive.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>correction: meant to say one will get a headache from all the repetitive talk on Libby cuase they will have nothing new after a point and be repeating the  talking points. Why tv is not meant to watch 24/7 because it is very repetitive.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: brettfan</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/03/06/verdict-in-scooter-libby-trial/#comment-27840</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 19:12:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/03/06/verdict-in-scooter-libby-trial/#comment-27840</guid>
					<description>my comment is that they have been talking this week on FNC about Walter Reed and no Anna Niocle on any channel! Can't say about last week, but is cyclical. Scotter Libby talk will now inundate all news channels till more gets a head with ad nauseum. Why Cable tv was not meant to watch 24/7.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>my comment is that they have been talking this week on FNC about Walter Reed and no Anna Niocle on any channel! Can&#8217;t say about last week, but is cyclical. Scotter Libby talk will now inundate all news channels till more gets a head with ad nauseum. Why Cable tv was not meant to watch 24/7.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: mike</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/03/06/verdict-in-scooter-libby-trial/#comment-27829</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 17:35:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/03/06/verdict-in-scooter-libby-trial/#comment-27829</guid>
					<description>........................Travesty..........................</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;Travesty&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;..
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: alice cervantes</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/03/06/verdict-in-scooter-libby-trial/#comment-27822</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 16:23:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/03/06/verdict-in-scooter-libby-trial/#comment-27822</guid>
					<description>They are not false accusations; they put out the least information they can on stories that are not favorable to the administration.  There was no way they could avoid the verdict even if they wanted to! Lets see if Cavuto says Stock market up due to guilty verdict.  I couldnt help myself. We dont need data all you have to have is half a brain.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>They are not false accusations; they put out the least information they can on stories that are not favorable to the administration.  There was no way they could avoid the verdict even if they wanted to! Lets see if Cavuto says Stock market up due to guilty verdict.  I couldnt help myself. We dont need data all you have to have is half a brain.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: elmonica</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/03/06/verdict-in-scooter-libby-trial/#comment-27821</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 16:10:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/03/06/verdict-in-scooter-libby-trial/#comment-27821</guid>
					<description>Unless I am missing something this thread was about the Scooter Libby Verdict.

As for Fox News coverage, I have heard from multiple sources that Hannity and Colmes haven't discussed the Walter Reed story once in the past week, not even for the mere sake of blaming it on the liberals.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Unless I am missing something this thread was about the Scooter Libby Verdict.</p>
	<p>As for Fox News coverage, I have heard from multiple sources that Hannity and Colmes haven&#8217;t discussed the Walter Reed story once in the past week, not even for the mere sake of blaming it on the liberals.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Missy</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/03/06/verdict-in-scooter-libby-trial/#comment-27817</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 15:39:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/03/06/verdict-in-scooter-libby-trial/#comment-27817</guid>
					<description>Fox mentioned the Walter Reed mismanagement 93 times, which seems significant, but because MSNBC and FNC mentioned it three times as often, you people deem that they &quot;don't care&quot;. 

At least Terance provided me with data.  The rest of you (alice, Mike, elmonica) should go seek out statistics before accusing Fox of ignoring any of these stories.  Before stating that Fox &quot;doesn't care&quot;, go get the frequency of how much they reported on those stories, vs. how much coverage was done by MSNBC and CNN.  Again, at least Terance provided data instead of just throwing out false accusations. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Fox mentioned the Walter Reed mismanagement 93 times, which seems significant, but because MSNBC and FNC mentioned it three times as often, you people deem that they &#8220;don&#8217;t care&#8221;. </p>
	<p>At least Terance provided me with data.  The rest of you (alice, Mike, elmonica) should go seek out statistics before accusing Fox of ignoring any of these stories.  Before stating that Fox &#8220;doesn&#8217;t care&#8221;, go get the frequency of how much they reported on those stories, vs. how much coverage was done by MSNBC and CNN.  Again, at least Terance provided data instead of just throwing out false accusations.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Spud</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/03/06/verdict-in-scooter-libby-trial/#comment-27816</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 15:35:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/03/06/verdict-in-scooter-libby-trial/#comment-27816</guid>
					<description>&lt;em&gt;Spud — Now I understand why every 3rd or 4th post is about Olbermann, I thought he just was of great interest to you. It must be that his people send you more information than anyone else. &lt;/em&gt;

LOL...the biggest source of info on Olbermann that I post comes from news write ups which I find on my own. The second biggest source of Olbermann info comes from Olbermann haters. I rarely get anything from &quot;his people&quot;.

I hardly post everything there is on Olbermann, just like I hardly post everything there is on O'Reilly. It has to be relevent information and not just ideological attacks or personal innuendo or rumor mongering. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p><em>Spud — Now I understand why every 3rd or 4th post is about Olbermann, I thought he just was of great interest to you. It must be that his people send you more information than anyone else. </em></p>
	<p>LOL&#8230;the biggest source of info on Olbermann that I post comes from news write ups which I find on my own. The second biggest source of Olbermann info comes from Olbermann haters. I rarely get anything from &#8220;his people&#8221;.</p>
	<p>I hardly post everything there is on Olbermann, just like I hardly post everything there is on O&#8217;Reilly. It has to be relevent information and not just ideological attacks or personal innuendo or rumor mongering.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Shaun</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/03/06/verdict-in-scooter-libby-trial/#comment-27813</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 15:29:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/03/06/verdict-in-scooter-libby-trial/#comment-27813</guid>
					<description>Aunt Mary and her conspiracy theories...  Adjust your tin foil hat there Mary.  You're receiving some bad information.  Or you could just the channel from the Propaganda Network to MSNBC or CNN.

Oh what a joyous day!  Libby has been convicted!  Next up: Cheney &amp;amp; Rove.  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Aunt Mary and her conspiracy theories&#8230;  Adjust your tin foil hat there Mary.  You&#8217;re receiving some bad information.  Or you could just the channel from the Propaganda Network to MSNBC or CNN.</p>
	<p>Oh what a joyous day!  Libby has been convicted!  Next up: Cheney &amp; Rove.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: elmonica</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/03/06/verdict-in-scooter-libby-trial/#comment-27811</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 15:16:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/03/06/verdict-in-scooter-libby-trial/#comment-27811</guid>
					<description>I am astonished that a jury could think that a neocon could lie.

Anyway don't feel too sad. Bush will pardon Libby upon exiting office as a thank you for libbys' efforts in building the case for war, and more importantly for keeping quiet about it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I am astonished that a jury could think that a neocon could lie.</p>
	<p>Anyway don&#8217;t feel too sad. Bush will pardon Libby upon exiting office as a thank you for libbys&#8217; efforts in building the case for war, and more importantly for keeping quiet about it.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Mike</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/03/06/verdict-in-scooter-libby-trial/#comment-27808</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 15:12:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/03/06/verdict-in-scooter-libby-trial/#comment-27808</guid>
					<description>Wrong Alice: Fox cares deeply about majijuana given to small children, dismembered wives, and other really important things like that. Why in the world would they care about such tripe as injured veterans being given substandard care, Iraq, or media manipulation from the White House?   </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Wrong Alice: Fox cares deeply about majijuana given to small children, dismembered wives, and other really important things like that. Why in the world would they care about such tripe as injured veterans being given substandard care, Iraq, or media manipulation from the White House?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Aunt Mary</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/03/06/verdict-in-scooter-libby-trial/#comment-27806</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 14:59:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/03/06/verdict-in-scooter-libby-trial/#comment-27806</guid>
					<description>Spud -- Now I understand why every 3rd or 4th post is about Olbermann, I thought he just was of great interest to you.  It must be that his people send you more information than anyone else.  That truely ties in with Abrams bragging about how Olbermann is so popular on YOUTUBE.  They make it happen and most likely blog along with us to keep the story going.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Spud &#8212; Now I understand why every 3rd or 4th post is about Olbermann, I thought he just was of great interest to you.  It must be that his people send you more information than anyone else.  That truely ties in with Abrams bragging about how Olbermann is so popular on YOUTUBE.  They make it happen and most likely blog along with us to keep the story going.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Spud</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/03/06/verdict-in-scooter-libby-trial/#comment-27804</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 14:44:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/03/06/verdict-in-scooter-libby-trial/#comment-27804</guid>
					<description>&lt;em&gt;BTW, MSNBC was the only one of the three not to cover the Presidents speech this morning. Why wasn’t this posted, SPUD? &lt;/em&gt;

I can only post about events that are relayed to me or that I myself witness. If I don't know about it, I can't write about it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p><em>BTW, MSNBC was the only one of the three not to cover the Presidents speech this morning. Why wasn’t this posted, SPUD? </em></p>
	<p>I can only post about events that are relayed to me or that I myself witness. If I don&#8217;t know about it, I can&#8217;t write about it.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: alice cervantes</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/03/06/verdict-in-scooter-libby-trial/#comment-27803</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 14:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/03/06/verdict-in-scooter-libby-trial/#comment-27803</guid>
					<description>who cares who broke this story first, who cares about Walter Reed, who cares about deaths in in Iraq.  Not Fox for sure; all they care about is Hilarys southern drawl and how mean the press is to Ann Coulter and not Maher.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>who cares who broke this story first, who cares about Walter Reed, who cares about deaths in in Iraq.  Not Fox for sure; all they care about is Hilarys southern drawl and how mean the press is to Ann Coulter and not Maher.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: ChrisM</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/03/06/verdict-in-scooter-libby-trial/#comment-27799</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 14:06:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/03/06/verdict-in-scooter-libby-trial/#comment-27799</guid>
					<description>No doubt Chris Mathews will have some of that nasty froth coming out of his mouth when he gets excited.  

BTW, MSNBC was the only one of the three not to cover the Presidents speech this morning.  Why wasn't this posted, SPUD?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>No doubt Chris Mathews will have some of that nasty froth coming out of his mouth when he gets excited.  </p>
	<p>BTW, MSNBC was the only one of the three not to cover the Presidents speech this morning.  Why wasn&#8217;t this posted, SPUD?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: RGL</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/03/06/verdict-in-scooter-libby-trial/#comment-27798</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 14:03:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/03/06/verdict-in-scooter-libby-trial/#comment-27798</guid>
					<description>Big deal! Who cares which cable channel broke the news first? Nobody had collapsed and nobody was dying from lack of oxygen to the brain, where time indeed is quite vital. This is about as pusillanimous as it can get. Time to get real, Spud!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Big deal! Who cares which cable channel broke the news first? Nobody had collapsed and nobody was dying from lack of oxygen to the brain, where time indeed is quite vital. This is about as pusillanimous as it can get. Time to get real, Spud!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: John</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/03/06/verdict-in-scooter-libby-trial/#comment-27796</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 13:51:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/03/06/verdict-in-scooter-libby-trial/#comment-27796</guid>
					<description>Now Chris Matthews can buy a round for everyone!  He's waited breathlessly for this verdict.  Do you think he'll be able to communicate his joy?  God, some people really need to get off the stage!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Now Chris Matthews can buy a round for everyone!  He&#8217;s waited breathlessly for this verdict.  Do you think he&#8217;ll be able to communicate his joy?  God, some people really need to get off the stage!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Kate</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/03/06/verdict-in-scooter-libby-trial/#comment-27794</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 13:38:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/03/06/verdict-in-scooter-libby-trial/#comment-27794</guid>
					<description>Unbelievable.  Sandy Berger stole and destroyed classified documents from the national archives and is not convicted of anything or punished in any meaningful way.  Scooter Libby doesn't remember exactly what he said to whom and is convicted!!  Armitage was the leaker, this is insane.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Unbelievable.  Sandy Berger stole and destroyed classified documents from the national archives and is not convicted of anything or punished in any meaningful way.  Scooter Libby doesn&#8217;t remember exactly what he said to whom and is convicted!!  Armitage was the leaker, this is insane.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Randy</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/03/06/verdict-in-scooter-libby-trial/#comment-27790</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 13:12:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/03/06/verdict-in-scooter-libby-trial/#comment-27790</guid>
					<description>Not surprising that MSNBC would get it first.  With David Schuster sentenced to cover this case for the past month, I think they have done the best job covering this.  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Not surprising that MSNBC would get it first.  With David Schuster sentenced to cover this case for the past month, I think they have done the best job covering this.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Roger</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/03/06/verdict-in-scooter-libby-trial/#comment-27788</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 13:06:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/03/06/verdict-in-scooter-libby-trial/#comment-27788</guid>
					<description>Decision in 2 min.....1min......59sec......58 sec......57......56sec....Fox News Alert....54sec......53 sec......E.D. Hill states.....52 sec.....1sec.....Guilty on all 5.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Decision in 2 min&#8230;..1min&#8230;&#8230;59sec&#8230;&#8230;58 sec&#8230;&#8230;57&#8230;&#8230;56sec&#8230;.Fox News Alert&#8230;.54sec&#8230;&#8230;53 sec&#8230;&#8230;E.D. Hill states&#8230;..52 sec&#8230;..1sec&#8230;..Guilty on all 5.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
