<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/1.5.1-alpha" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Rachel Marsden profile&#8230;</title>
	<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/03/29/rachel-marsden-profile/</link>
	<description>Unvarnished news &#038; opinion on cable news</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 19:40:03 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=1.5.1-alpha</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: myview</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/03/29/rachel-marsden-profile/#comment-29966</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2007 21:20:37 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/03/29/rachel-marsden-profile/#comment-29966</guid>
					<description>Never mind that she is on TV and in newspapers, she was once asked to run as a candidate for the Conservative Party until saner heads prevailed. 

http://westernstandard.blogs.com/shotgun/2005/11/too_ahem_high_p.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Never mind that she is on TV and in newspapers, she was once asked to run as a candidate for the Conservative Party until saner heads prevailed. </p>
	<p><a >http://westernstandard.blogs.com/shotgun/2005/11/too_ahem_high_p.html</a>
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Ira</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/03/29/rachel-marsden-profile/#comment-29959</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2007 20:16:11 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/03/29/rachel-marsden-profile/#comment-29959</guid>
					<description>Whoops, I meant &lt;b&gt;radioactive.&lt;/b&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Whoops, I meant <b>radioactive.</b>
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Ira</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/03/29/rachel-marsden-profile/#comment-29958</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2007 20:15:12 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/03/29/rachel-marsden-profile/#comment-29958</guid>
					<description>myview: I would have thought that after the sexual harrassment incidents, Marsden would have been retroactive for any newspaper or TV station.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>myview: I would have thought that after the sexual harrassment incidents, Marsden would have been retroactive for any newspaper or TV station.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: myview</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/03/29/rachel-marsden-profile/#comment-29889</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2007 12:58:12 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/03/29/rachel-marsden-profile/#comment-29889</guid>
					<description>I wouldn't say her career blossomed in Canada.She tends to embellish her credentials a bit. As far as landing on FNC I think it's her very conservative political views and probably that whole &quot;babe&quot; thing. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I wouldn&#8217;t say her career blossomed in Canada.She tends to embellish her credentials a bit. As far as landing on FNC I think it&#8217;s her very conservative political views and probably that whole &#8220;babe&#8221; thing.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Ira</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/03/29/rachel-marsden-profile/#comment-29873</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2007 12:05:34 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/03/29/rachel-marsden-profile/#comment-29873</guid>
					<description>myview: Initially I dismissed your post as typical anti-FNC.  But Glenn Sacks, a &quot;men's rights&quot; advocate, wrote a very interesting column about Marsden and some of her &quot;adventures&quot; with men in British Columbia.

My question: if Marsden is apparently unstable and has problems with men, how did her career blossom in Canada, eventually leading to TV and the &quot;Red Eye&quot; gig?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>myview: Initially I dismissed your post as typical anti-FNC.  But Glenn Sacks, a &#8220;men&#8217;s rights&#8221; advocate, wrote a very interesting column about Marsden and some of her &#8220;adventures&#8221; with men in British Columbia.</p>
	<p>My question: if Marsden is apparently unstable and has problems with men, how did her career blossom in Canada, eventually leading to TV and the &#8220;Red Eye&#8221; gig?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: spiffo</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/03/29/rachel-marsden-profile/#comment-29868</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2007 10:23:37 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/03/29/rachel-marsden-profile/#comment-29868</guid>
					<description>I'd like to see some of the &quot;pasts&quot; of that den of liberal moonbats at Salon.  That would be a story worth reporting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I&#8217;d like to see some of the &#8220;pasts&#8221; of that den of liberal moonbats at Salon.  That would be a story worth reporting.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Edward Schatz</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/03/29/rachel-marsden-profile/#comment-29861</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2007 01:11:38 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/03/29/rachel-marsden-profile/#comment-29861</guid>
					<description>She can harass me if she wants to.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>She can harass me if she wants to.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: myview</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/03/29/rachel-marsden-profile/#comment-29845</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2007 19:46:59 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/03/29/rachel-marsden-profile/#comment-29845</guid>
					<description>Lurker it wasn't a hit piece on Red Eye.It was an article on Rachel Marsden and her three, yes three incidents of harassing.Oh and before you say oh poor Rachel was harassed, it was her doing the harassing.   </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Lurker it wasn&#8217;t a hit piece on Red Eye.It was an article on Rachel Marsden and her three, yes three incidents of harassing.Oh and before you say oh poor Rachel was harassed, it was her doing the harassing.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Ira</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/03/29/rachel-marsden-profile/#comment-29843</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2007 19:40:58 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/03/29/rachel-marsden-profile/#comment-29843</guid>
					<description>Lurker:  Rachel is definitely the &lt;i&gt;Canadian Ann Coulter!&lt;/i&gt;

Despite getting viirtually no promotion from Fox, &quot;Red Eye&quot; is constantly improving and hopefully is developing a cult following.

Agree about Janice Dean &quot;the weather machine!&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Lurker:  Rachel is definitely the <i>Canadian Ann Coulter!</i></p>
	<p>Despite getting viirtually no promotion from Fox, &#8220;Red Eye&#8221; is constantly improving and hopefully is developing a cult following.</p>
	<p>Agree about Janice Dean &#8220;the weather machine!&#8221;
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Lurker</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/03/29/rachel-marsden-profile/#comment-29825</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2007 16:32:26 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/03/29/rachel-marsden-profile/#comment-29825</guid>
					<description>Liberal whining about a 2am show. RED EYE must be a BIG hit for her to write a 4 plus page hit peice. BTW - RED EYE is the best show on FNC. Janice Dean was a riot the other day.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Liberal whining about a 2am show. RED EYE must be a BIG hit for her to write a 4 plus page hit peice. BTW - RED EYE is the best show on FNC. Janice Dean was a riot the other day.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
