<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/1.5.1-alpha" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Wednesday&#8217;s Numbers&#8230;</title>
	<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/03/29/wednesdays-numbers-48/</link>
	<description>Unvarnished news &#038; opinion on cable news</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 19:41:18 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=1.5.1-alpha</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: puck</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/03/29/wednesdays-numbers-48/#comment-29955</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2007 20:07:45 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/03/29/wednesdays-numbers-48/#comment-29955</guid>
					<description>So...... If Hannity is a baffoon with his ratings then what does that make Larry King and Joe Scarborough? It must suck to have a baffoon beat you night after night.

And while were at it......What happened to that &quot;&quot;FIRM&quot;&quot; grip somebody had on second place? </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>So&#8230;&#8230; If Hannity is a baffoon with his ratings then what does that make Larry King and Joe Scarborough? It must suck to have a baffoon beat you night after night.</p>
	<p>And while were at it&#8230;&#8230;What happened to that &#8220;&#8221;FIRM&#8221;" grip somebody had on second place?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Randy</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/03/29/wednesdays-numbers-48/#comment-29885</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2007 12:48:02 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/03/29/wednesdays-numbers-48/#comment-29885</guid>
					<description>Chet, Hannity is not a Republican Strategist.  He is just a baffoon.  Its Jane Fleming's job to always defend the party.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Chet, Hannity is not a Republican Strategist.  He is just a baffoon.  Its Jane Fleming&#8217;s job to always defend the party.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Chet</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/03/29/wednesdays-numbers-48/#comment-29867</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2007 10:18:16 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/03/29/wednesdays-numbers-48/#comment-29867</guid>
					<description>Randy-- Hannity criticizes Republicans for spending and on immigration... that woman, Jane Fleming, just doesn't answer questions that shes asked.. pay attention</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Randy&#8211; Hannity criticizes Republicans for spending and on immigration&#8230; that woman, Jane Fleming, just doesn&#8217;t answer questions that shes asked.. pay attention
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Tom</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/03/29/wednesdays-numbers-48/#comment-29859</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2007 00:20:31 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/03/29/wednesdays-numbers-48/#comment-29859</guid>
					<description>Has that genius from the Cornell Alumni Magazine issued a correction yet for his comical and bogus claim that Olbermann has a lock on &quot;second&quot; place?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Has that genius from the Cornell Alumni Magazine issued a correction yet for his comical and bogus claim that Olbermann has a lock on &#8220;second&#8221; place?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Randy</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/03/29/wednesdays-numbers-48/#comment-29858</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2007 23:52:36 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/03/29/wednesdays-numbers-48/#comment-29858</guid>
					<description>Chet, are you kidding me?  Why on Earth would a dem strategist criticize their own party??  That wouldnt be doing her job very well, would it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Chet, are you kidding me?  Why on Earth would a dem strategist criticize their own party??  That wouldnt be doing her job very well, would it?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Chet</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/03/29/wednesdays-numbers-48/#comment-29857</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2007 23:33:18 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/03/29/wednesdays-numbers-48/#comment-29857</guid>
					<description>Yes Ira I was watching it on H&amp;amp;C.. I thought Bush was pretty funny... anyways, I can't stand Jane Fleming (the dem. strategist on FOX).. she cant ever criticize dems on the most obvious things</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Yes Ira I was watching it on H&amp;C.. I thought Bush was pretty funny&#8230; anyways, I can&#8217;t stand Jane Fleming (the dem. strategist on FOX).. she cant ever criticize dems on the most obvious things
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Ira</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/03/29/wednesdays-numbers-48/#comment-29855</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2007 22:30:23 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/03/29/wednesdays-numbers-48/#comment-29855</guid>
					<description>Chet:  Although we don't have the ratings by quarter-hour, I'll bet &lt;i&gt;Hannity and Colmes&lt;/i&gt; was much higher in the final 30 minutes, after &lt;i&gt;American Idol&lt;/i&gt; and also during President Bush's comedy routine at the Radio and TV Correspondents' Dinner. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Chet:  Although we don&#8217;t have the ratings by quarter-hour, I&#8217;ll bet <i>Hannity and Colmes</i> was much higher in the final 30 minutes, after <i>American Idol</i> and also during President Bush&#8217;s comedy routine at the Radio and TV Correspondents&#8217; Dinner.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Spud</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/03/29/wednesdays-numbers-48/#comment-29853</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2007 22:01:08 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/03/29/wednesdays-numbers-48/#comment-29853</guid>
					<description>As far as I've seen there's been no promotion for the 10pm repeat.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>As far as I&#8217;ve seen there&#8217;s been no promotion for the 10pm repeat.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Aunt Mary</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/03/29/wednesdays-numbers-48/#comment-29849</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2007 21:05:53 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/03/29/wednesdays-numbers-48/#comment-29849</guid>
					<description>Last night Joe Scarborough had a &quot;Special&quot; with Dateline.  No politics.  He still had good numbers (for his show).  I have often slammed Joe for the fact that he does not represent the views of the &quot;Redneck Riviera&quot; of the Gulf Coast (his home).  Why, because the people are heavy right and Joe is not. However, I think Joe is at his best with topics other that politics.  He is doing more and more variety and he really shines, smiles and genuinely seems to enjoy himself. He is more of a showman at heart and I think he is trying to create his own style show with a lot less politics.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Last night Joe Scarborough had a &#8220;Special&#8221; with Dateline.  No politics.  He still had good numbers (for his show).  I have often slammed Joe for the fact that he does not represent the views of the &#8220;Redneck Riviera&#8221; of the Gulf Coast (his home).  Why, because the people are heavy right and Joe is not. However, I think Joe is at his best with topics other that politics.  He is doing more and more variety and he really shines, smiles and genuinely seems to enjoy himself. He is more of a showman at heart and I think he is trying to create his own style show with a lot less politics.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Maddy</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/03/29/wednesdays-numbers-48/#comment-29848</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2007 20:34:53 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/03/29/wednesdays-numbers-48/#comment-29848</guid>
					<description>Has MSNBC been promoting the Countdown repeat at 10 p.m.?  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Has MSNBC been promoting the Countdown repeat at 10 p.m.?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Chet</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/03/29/wednesdays-numbers-48/#comment-29846</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2007 19:48:32 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/03/29/wednesdays-numbers-48/#comment-29846</guid>
					<description>Maybe people like the new set for H&amp;amp;C</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Maybe people like the new set for H&amp;C
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: erljr</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/03/29/wednesdays-numbers-48/#comment-29841</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2007 19:36:38 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/03/29/wednesdays-numbers-48/#comment-29841</guid>
					<description>Arthur means the &lt;i&gt;ratio&lt;/i&gt; of demo over total, ie, demo &lt;i&gt;divided by&lt;/i&gt; total. It's greater than 1/2(50%), which is pretty darn good. 
If Arthur told his girlfriend that he's got 50%, when she's used to somewhere between 10% and 25%, she would be pretty happy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Arthur means the <i>ratio</i> of demo over total, ie, demo <i>divided by</i> total. It&#8217;s greater than 1/2(50%), which is pretty darn good.<br />
If Arthur told his girlfriend that he&#8217;s got 50%, when she&#8217;s used to somewhere between 10% and 25%, she would be pretty happy.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Ira</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/03/29/wednesdays-numbers-48/#comment-29840</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2007 19:34:21 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/03/29/wednesdays-numbers-48/#comment-29840</guid>
					<description>Despite competing with the American Idol results show in most of the USA, a better than average night for Hannity and Colmes; nearly 2:1 over LKL. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Despite competing with the American Idol results show in most of the USA, a better than average night for Hannity and Colmes; nearly 2:1 over LKL.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Randy</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/03/29/wednesdays-numbers-48/#comment-29839</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2007 19:31:29 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/03/29/wednesdays-numbers-48/#comment-29839</guid>
					<description>In fact, KO more than doubled her on Tuesday in the demo.  He was a little off on the demo numbers on Wednesday, but still finished in second place in total viewers. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>In fact, KO more than doubled her on Tuesday in the demo.  He was a little off on the demo numbers on Wednesday, but still finished in second place in total viewers.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Randy</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/03/29/wednesdays-numbers-48/#comment-29838</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2007 19:28:18 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/03/29/wednesdays-numbers-48/#comment-29838</guid>
					<description>Hey Edward, Im sure you havent noticed that he doesnt finish below HLN repeatedly, and in fact this week has finised ahead of them I believe on Monday and Tuesday.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Hey Edward, Im sure you havent noticed that he doesnt finish below HLN repeatedly, and in fact this week has finised ahead of them I believe on Monday and Tuesday.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Arthur</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/03/29/wednesdays-numbers-48/#comment-29835</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2007 19:11:56 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/03/29/wednesdays-numbers-48/#comment-29835</guid>
					<description>&lt;i&gt;KO was usually better in the demo than the overall, weird the older people are starting to watch, and the younger crowd are tuning out.&lt;/i&gt;

Jim, it appears that a number of them have just switched to the 10PM repeat. The demos for the rerun is proportionally quite large. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p><i>KO was usually better in the demo than the overall, weird the older people are starting to watch, and the younger crowd are tuning out.</i></p>
	<p>Jim, it appears that a number of them have just switched to the 10PM repeat. The demos for the rerun is proportionally quite large.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Edward Schatz</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/03/29/wednesdays-numbers-48/#comment-29834</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2007 18:49:51 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/03/29/wednesdays-numbers-48/#comment-29834</guid>
					<description>*happy</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>*happy
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Jim</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/03/29/wednesdays-numbers-48/#comment-29833</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2007 18:49:34 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/03/29/wednesdays-numbers-48/#comment-29833</guid>
					<description>KO was usually better in the demo than the overall, weird the older people are starting to watch, and the younger crowd are tuning out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>KO was usually better in the demo than the overall, weird the older people are starting to watch, and the younger crowd are tuning out.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Edward Schatz</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/03/29/wednesdays-numbers-48/#comment-29832</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2007 18:49:29 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/03/29/wednesdays-numbers-48/#comment-29832</guid>
					<description>Well Randy, if you are happy coming in last in the demo over HLN repeatedly and having the 10pm rerun of your flagship show get crushed, by all means, be hapy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Well Randy, if you are happy coming in last in the demo over HLN repeatedly and having the 10pm rerun of your flagship show get crushed, by all means, be hapy.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Randy</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/03/29/wednesdays-numbers-48/#comment-29831</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2007 18:44:47 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/03/29/wednesdays-numbers-48/#comment-29831</guid>
					<description>IF Im KO and MSNBC, Im fine with these numbers for him, as well as the numbers overall for th week.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>IF Im KO and MSNBC, Im fine with these numbers for him, as well as the numbers overall for th week.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Edward Schatz</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/03/29/wednesdays-numbers-48/#comment-29830</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2007 18:36:18 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/03/29/wednesdays-numbers-48/#comment-29830</guid>
					<description>4th in key, beloved, coveted all important demo; second overall. Well at least KO is maintaining his firm grasp on the old people.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>4th in key, beloved, coveted all important demo; second overall. Well at least KO is maintaining his firm grasp on the old people.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
