April 3, 2007
5 Comments »
TrackBack: http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/04/03/q1-numbers-program-ranker/trackback/
RSS feed for comments on this post.
TrackBack: http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/04/03/q1-numbers-program-ranker/trackback/
RSS feed for comments on this post.
Get free blog up and running in minutes with Blogsome | Theme designs available here
Question. How come “The O’Reilly Factor” is listed twice? Why does the repeat make it on the list, while other shows with repeats don’t?
The only other same-day repeat I found was “Mad Money” way at the bottom of the list.
IMO, either list all the repeats… or list none of them.
Comment by ImNotBlue — April 3, 2007 @ 8:56 pm
Spud would you care to explain why the Q1 estimates for the Programmer ranker is so different from the Q1 estimates for the comparison chart.
Comment by Sam — April 3, 2007 @ 9:15 pm
Another question: How is it that Countdown, ranked position #21 (if I’m counting correctly) is lauded by all the media as the “up and coming thing”, “smart”, etc., while the media has basically panned and destined Paula Zahn’s program, at position #22, for the graveyard? Less than 40,000 demo viewers separate these two programs!!!
And while I’m an O’Reilly viewer, I have seen Paula’s program at times, and it seems at least as informative as anything on any of these cable networks.
Comment by Missy — April 3, 2007 @ 10:01 pm
And look at who’s #20 - the pre-eminent journalist of our time, interesting that his numbers suck so bad even with all the love talk from Klein.
Comment by Cooperite — April 4, 2007 @ 10:59 am
Actually both Missy and Cooperite are incorrect, Cooper is ranked 19th (not 20th) and KO is ranked 20th (not 21st).
Aren’t you going to answer my question spud? why are the Q1 estimates for the comparison chart different from those for the Programme Ranker. Is it that they use different sampling days or something?
Comment by Sam — April 4, 2007 @ 6:22 pm