<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/1.5.1-alpha" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: FNC Debate: First pictures&#8230;</title>
	<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/05/15/fnc-debate-first-pictures/</link>
	<description>Unvarnished news &#038; opinion on cable news</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 08:32:28 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=1.5.1-alpha</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Alison</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/05/15/fnc-debate-first-pictures/#comment-36037</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2007 15:22:01 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/05/15/fnc-debate-first-pictures/#comment-36037</guid>
					<description>It looks like the Jeopardy set to me too! </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>It looks like the Jeopardy set to me too!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Amused</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/05/15/fnc-debate-first-pictures/#comment-36009</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2007 12:19:57 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/05/15/fnc-debate-first-pictures/#comment-36009</guid>
					<description>Ira, I think of these early debates as more like the halftime show -- entertainment potential, while hoping for no wardrobe malfunctions. ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Ira, I think of these early debates as more like the halftime show &#8212; entertainment potential, while hoping for no wardrobe malfunctions. ;)
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Ira</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/05/15/fnc-debate-first-pictures/#comment-36008</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2007 11:56:19 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/05/15/fnc-debate-first-pictures/#comment-36008</guid>
					<description>Terence: I compare these early debates with the first NFL preseason game.  You want a quick glance of all the new players on the team and the numbers on their jersey but that's about it.  

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Terence: I compare these early debates with the first NFL preseason game.  You want a quick glance of all the new players on the team and the numbers on their jersey but that&#8217;s about it.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Amused</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/05/15/fnc-debate-first-pictures/#comment-36007</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2007 11:51:28 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/05/15/fnc-debate-first-pictures/#comment-36007</guid>
					<description>Calm down, Nobody. It's just my personal opinion, and I am entitled to that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Calm down, Nobody. It&#8217;s just my personal opinion, and I am entitled to that.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Nobody</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/05/15/fnc-debate-first-pictures/#comment-36006</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2007 10:51:33 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/05/15/fnc-debate-first-pictures/#comment-36006</guid>
					<description>Amused, who are you to decide who should or should not be on the stage? This is America, and everyone who was born here and is over 35 has a right to run for president.  Yes, I agree, having people like Al Sharpton run for publicity hurts the overall effort of the party in general, but it was his right to run and if Republicans want to start banning people from running, then go right ahead, but it will be a sad day if that ever happens.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Amused, who are you to decide who should or should not be on the stage? This is America, and everyone who was born here and is over 35 has a right to run for president.  Yes, I agree, having people like Al Sharpton run for publicity hurts the overall effort of the party in general, but it was his right to run and if Republicans want to start banning people from running, then go right ahead, but it will be a sad day if that ever happens.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Amused</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/05/15/fnc-debate-first-pictures/#comment-36005</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2007 10:43:45 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/05/15/fnc-debate-first-pictures/#comment-36005</guid>
					<description>And the 3 genuises who don't believe in evolution should be automatically barred from ever seeking public office again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>And the 3 genuises who don&#8217;t believe in evolution should be automatically barred from ever seeking public office again.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Amused</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/05/15/fnc-debate-first-pictures/#comment-36004</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2007 10:42:59 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/05/15/fnc-debate-first-pictures/#comment-36004</guid>
					<description>No-chance candidates like Hunter and Tancredo (and Huckabee and Brownback and Thompson and crazy Ron Paul and the other forgettables) don't belong in the debates. With so many people on the stage, the legitimate contenders don't get a real chance to tell us about themselves. It becomes an attention grab for the no-hopes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>No-chance candidates like Hunter and Tancredo (and Huckabee and Brownback and Thompson and crazy Ron Paul and the other forgettables) don&#8217;t belong in the debates. With so many people on the stage, the legitimate contenders don&#8217;t get a real chance to tell us about themselves. It becomes an attention grab for the no-hopes.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Rick</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/05/15/fnc-debate-first-pictures/#comment-36003</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2007 10:39:20 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/05/15/fnc-debate-first-pictures/#comment-36003</guid>
					<description>I hope that giant LED flag is not animated or I think it might be more of a distraction.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I hope that giant LED flag is not animated or I think it might be more of a distraction.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Spud</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/05/15/fnc-debate-first-pictures/#comment-36000</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2007 10:15:42 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/05/15/fnc-debate-first-pictures/#comment-36000</guid>
					<description>No they don't. You would have a valid argument if this was December. But it's not December. At this point in the contest it's fine to have the &quot;chum&quot; along with the &quot;big fish&quot;...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>No they don&#8217;t. You would have a valid argument if this was December. But it&#8217;s not December. At this point in the contest it&#8217;s fine to have the &#8220;chum&#8221; along with the &#8220;big fish&#8221;&#8230;
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Missy</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/05/15/fnc-debate-first-pictures/#comment-35999</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2007 10:14:25 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/05/15/fnc-debate-first-pictures/#comment-35999</guid>
					<description>Duncan Hunter and Tom Tancredo are two &quot;no chance in hell&quot; candidates who actually personify everything we conservatives want in a candidate.  Maybe their showing in these debates will lift them out of obscurity so that they get recognition among the masses. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Duncan Hunter and Tom Tancredo are two &#8220;no chance in hell&#8221; candidates who actually personify everything we conservatives want in a candidate.  Maybe their showing in these debates will lift them out of obscurity so that they get recognition among the masses.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Terance</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/05/15/fnc-debate-first-pictures/#comment-35998</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2007 09:57:50 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/05/15/fnc-debate-first-pictures/#comment-35998</guid>
					<description>I agree with RGL. The dems debate was almost as bad with 8(?) candidates... These &quot;no chance in hell&quot; types need to get off the stage. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I agree with RGL. The dems debate was almost as bad with 8(?) candidates&#8230; These &#8220;no chance in hell&#8221; types need to get off the stage.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: CompMike</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/05/15/fnc-debate-first-pictures/#comment-35995</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2007 09:22:38 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/05/15/fnc-debate-first-pictures/#comment-35995</guid>
					<description>I love FoxNews, but this reminds me of Jeopardy. 

&quot;I'll take immigration for 400, Brit.&quot; -Sen. McCain



</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I love FoxNews, but this reminds me of Jeopardy. </p>
	<p>&#8220;I&#8217;ll take immigration for 400, Brit.&#8221; -Sen. McCain
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: RGL</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/05/15/fnc-debate-first-pictures/#comment-35992</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2007 08:53:20 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/05/15/fnc-debate-first-pictures/#comment-35992</guid>
					<description>I really wish the list of 10 candidates could be whittled down to, say, six, which would mean that those with single-digit poll numbers should volunatarily drop out. This should give the top-tier candidates more time to answer questions and to let voters knows of their positions om various vital issues. Immigration, for example, has not been addressed, and we don't know the positions of whether they favor amnesty or not (except for Tome Tancredo and Duncan Hunter, who are against it.)

Into the not-too-distant future, this field is going to be more crowded with the anticipated entrance of Newt Gingrich and Fred Thompson. Ninety minutes would give those candidates nothing more than sound bites. We deserve better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I really wish the list of 10 candidates could be whittled down to, say, six, which would mean that those with single-digit poll numbers should volunatarily drop out. This should give the top-tier candidates more time to answer questions and to let voters knows of their positions om various vital issues. Immigration, for example, has not been addressed, and we don&#8217;t know the positions of whether they favor amnesty or not (except for Tome Tancredo and Duncan Hunter, who are against it.)</p>
	<p>Into the not-too-distant future, this field is going to be more crowded with the anticipated entrance of Newt Gingrich and Fred Thompson. Ninety minutes would give those candidates nothing more than sound bites. We deserve better.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Don</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/05/15/fnc-debate-first-pictures/#comment-35991</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2007 08:52:04 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/05/15/fnc-debate-first-pictures/#comment-35991</guid>
					<description>so we pay more attention to the set then the candidates?  good job fox news</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>so we pay more attention to the set then the candidates?  good job fox news
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Mike Beckham</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/05/15/fnc-debate-first-pictures/#comment-35988</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2007 08:23:21 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/05/15/fnc-debate-first-pictures/#comment-35988</guid>
					<description>Well it can't be on FOX without being over the top.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Well it can&#8217;t be on FOX without being over the top.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: lightswitch</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/05/15/fnc-debate-first-pictures/#comment-35981</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2007 02:37:52 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/05/15/fnc-debate-first-pictures/#comment-35981</guid>
					<description>Yeah, seems a tad on the flashy side (a big tad). Maybe it will look better on t.v. than it does in these still photos though, I dunno.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Yeah, seems a tad on the flashy side (a big tad). Maybe it will look better on t.v. than it does in these still photos though, I dunno.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: James</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/05/15/fnc-debate-first-pictures/#comment-35976</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2007 00:56:02 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/05/15/fnc-debate-first-pictures/#comment-35976</guid>
					<description>DEAL!!! or, maybe NO DEAL!!!  I just hope the briefcase girls show up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>DEAL!!! or, maybe NO DEAL!!!  I just hope the briefcase girls show up.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
