<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/1.5.1-alpha" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Tuesday&#8217;s Numbers&#8230;</title>
	<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/06/27/tuesdays-numbers-45/</link>
	<description>Unvarnished news &#038; opinion on cable news</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 15:52:45 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=1.5.1-alpha</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: az wildcat</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/06/27/tuesdays-numbers-45/#comment-41585</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2007 16:48:04 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/06/27/tuesdays-numbers-45/#comment-41585</guid>
					<description>Nice to see msnbc sinking like a sinking rat. O did i say rat would that be dan. Yes i do want imusck but not on msnbc they don't deserve him.Would lov to see him on fox.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Nice to see msnbc sinking like a sinking rat. O did i say rat would that be dan. Yes i do want imusck but not on msnbc they don&#8217;t deserve him.Would lov to see him on fox.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: foxmeansbusiness</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/06/27/tuesdays-numbers-45/#comment-41577</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2007 15:17:46 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/06/27/tuesdays-numbers-45/#comment-41577</guid>
					<description>I see Dolberman and Loser Abrams went off on Orielly last night.

I mean really have some class PMSNBC, your network is a failure-admit it-FOX is not why you are losers, its your liberal Bush bashing programing that is a loser.  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I see Dolberman and Loser Abrams went off on Orielly last night.</p>
	<p>I mean really have some class PMSNBC, your network is a failure-admit it-FOX is not why you are losers, its your liberal Bush bashing programing that is a loser.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Grady Louis</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/06/27/tuesdays-numbers-45/#comment-41576</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2007 15:03:26 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/06/27/tuesdays-numbers-45/#comment-41576</guid>
					<description>Beck beats Crissy-Matt AGAIN!!!

....even on &quot;stupor tuesday&quot; and with Coulter/Edwards showdown.

Why is no one ever talkin' 'bout Beck?  Good or bad?  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Beck beats Crissy-Matt AGAIN!!!</p>
	<p>&#8230;.even on &#8220;stupor tuesday&#8221; and with Coulter/Edwards showdown.</p>
	<p>Why is no one ever talkin&#8217; &#8217;bout Beck?  Good or bad?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: carrie elkin</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/06/27/tuesdays-numbers-45/#comment-41571</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2007 14:16:08 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/06/27/tuesdays-numbers-45/#comment-41571</guid>
					<description>Morning Joe spent the entire morning talking about how they weren't going to talk about Paris Hilton...you can't make this stuff up...the other networks are dissing CNN, because LK got the Paris interview....but you know that it's got to be killing them inside...interesting!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Morning Joe spent the entire morning talking about how they weren&#8217;t going to talk about Paris Hilton&#8230;you can&#8217;t make this stuff up&#8230;the other networks are dissing CNN, because LK got the Paris interview&#8230;.but you know that it&#8217;s got to be killing them inside&#8230;interesting!!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Alison</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/06/27/tuesdays-numbers-45/#comment-41521</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2007 07:49:04 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/06/27/tuesdays-numbers-45/#comment-41521</guid>
					<description>Unless it's the media who fawn all over the likes of Olbermann with his pathetic ratings numbers when they insist in article after article he's a &quot;ratings success&quot;. If that's successful, I sure would hate to see unsuccessful! Oh wait, unsuccessful flop would be defined as &quot;Morning Joe&quot;. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Unless it&#8217;s the media who fawn all over the likes of Olbermann with his pathetic ratings numbers when they insist in article after article he&#8217;s a &#8220;ratings success&#8221;. If that&#8217;s successful, I sure would hate to see unsuccessful! Oh wait, unsuccessful flop would be defined as &#8220;Morning Joe&#8221;.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Edward Schatz</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/06/27/tuesdays-numbers-45/#comment-41505</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jun 2007 23:05:59 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/06/27/tuesdays-numbers-45/#comment-41505</guid>
					<description>Everything counts in large amounts</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Everything counts in large amounts
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Chris</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/06/27/tuesdays-numbers-45/#comment-41502</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jun 2007 22:57:00 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/06/27/tuesdays-numbers-45/#comment-41502</guid>
					<description>Good lord people, stop kicking MSNBC! You're no better than the bragger is you just act as much of an ass. If anything, Crime seems to have hit a sweet spot again since Grace hasn't seen this good of numbers for awhile, I mean, May 29th and Grace only had a 527/200 vs. what she has now. Both network wave depending what the big news is, and right now it's the missing mother and random wrestler killing his family.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Good lord people, stop kicking MSNBC! You&#8217;re no better than the bragger is you just act as much of an ass. If anything, Crime seems to have hit a sweet spot again since Grace hasn&#8217;t seen this good of numbers for awhile, I mean, May 29th and Grace only had a 527/200 vs. what she has now. Both network wave depending what the big news is, and right now it&#8217;s the missing mother and random wrestler killing his family.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Peggy</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/06/27/tuesdays-numbers-45/#comment-41499</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jun 2007 22:52:53 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/06/27/tuesdays-numbers-45/#comment-41499</guid>
					<description>HA!!!!HA HA HA !!!!!!!!!!! HAHAHAHAHAHAH!!!!!!!!!!!!
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>HA!!!!HA HA HA !!!!!!!!!!! HAHAHAHAHAHAH!!!!!!!!!!!!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Jim</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/06/27/tuesdays-numbers-45/#comment-41498</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jun 2007 22:49:46 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/06/27/tuesdays-numbers-45/#comment-41498</guid>
					<description>Uh, it wasn't a straight face.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Uh, it wasn&#8217;t a straight face.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: mlong</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/06/27/tuesdays-numbers-45/#comment-41496</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jun 2007 22:39:39 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/06/27/tuesdays-numbers-45/#comment-41496</guid>
					<description>&quot;Not only proud of MSNBC’s numbers, but their commitment to the quality and integrity in the manner they provide news coverage and inciteful debate.&quot;

HA!!HA!!HA!!HA!!HA!!HA!!..oh god!!!HA!!HA!!HA!!HA!!..how did you say that with a straight face?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>&#8220;Not only proud of MSNBC’s numbers, but their commitment to the quality and integrity in the manner they provide news coverage and inciteful debate.&#8221;</p>
	<p>HA!!HA!!HA!!HA!!HA!!HA!!..oh god!!!HA!!HA!!HA!!HA!!..how did you say that with a straight face?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Jim</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/06/27/tuesdays-numbers-45/#comment-41495</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jun 2007 22:38:59 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/06/27/tuesdays-numbers-45/#comment-41495</guid>
					<description>I think I meant to say insightful, but now that I think about it, I'll leave it the way it is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I think I meant to say insightful, but now that I think about it, I&#8217;ll leave it the way it is.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Jim</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/06/27/tuesdays-numbers-45/#comment-41492</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jun 2007 22:09:37 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/06/27/tuesdays-numbers-45/#comment-41492</guid>
					<description>&quot;Still waiting for Dan to send his memo on how proud he his of MSNBC #s.&quot;

Not only proud of MSNBC's numbers, but their commitment to the quality and integrity in the manner they provide news coverage and inciteful debate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>&#8220;Still waiting for Dan to send his memo on how proud he his of MSNBC #s.&#8221;</p>
	<p>Not only proud of MSNBC&#8217;s numbers, but their commitment to the quality and integrity in the manner they provide news coverage and inciteful debate.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Nadine</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/06/27/tuesdays-numbers-45/#comment-41481</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jun 2007 21:45:17 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/06/27/tuesdays-numbers-45/#comment-41481</guid>
					<description>It makes me proud to se BO kick the heck out of the competition  night after night.  His program is one of the only programs left on TV that supports traditional values. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>It makes me proud to se BO kick the heck out of the competition  night after night.  His program is one of the only programs left on TV that supports traditional values.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/06/27/tuesdays-numbers-45/#comment-41480</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jun 2007 21:43:05 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/06/27/tuesdays-numbers-45/#comment-41480</guid>
					<description>Dear MSNBC Staff,

We've managed to beat CNBC and firmly grip the fourth place spot in the cable race.  Our morning program is a success, with ratings down only -60% from when Imus was on board...remarkable!  Keep it up MSNBC-ers!

-Love Dan A
xoxox</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Dear MSNBC Staff,</p>
	<p>We&#8217;ve managed to beat CNBC and firmly grip the fourth place spot in the cable race.  Our morning program is a success, with ratings down only -60% from when Imus was on board&#8230;remarkable!  Keep it up MSNBC-ers!</p>
	<p>-Love Dan A<br />
xoxox
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: foxmeansbusiness</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/06/27/tuesdays-numbers-45/#comment-41477</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jun 2007 21:32:40 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/06/27/tuesdays-numbers-45/#comment-41477</guid>
					<description>Nancy is killing Dolberman, PMSNBC likes to tout how fast they are growing but that line has hit a wall. After all there are a limited amount of uninformed-rely on Government people in America.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Nancy is killing Dolberman, PMSNBC likes to tout how fast they are growing but that line has hit a wall. After all there are a limited amount of uninformed-rely on Government people in America.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: foxmeansbusiness</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/06/27/tuesdays-numbers-45/#comment-41476</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jun 2007 21:32:00 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/06/27/tuesdays-numbers-45/#comment-41476</guid>
					<description>Nancy is killing Dolberman, PMSNBC likes to tout how fast they are growing but that line has hit a wall. After all there are a limited amount of uninformed-rely on Government people in America.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Nancy is killing Dolberman, PMSNBC likes to tout how fast they are growing but that line has hit a wall. After all there are a limited amount of uninformed-rely on Government people in America.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Alix</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/06/27/tuesdays-numbers-45/#comment-41474</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jun 2007 21:15:25 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/06/27/tuesdays-numbers-45/#comment-41474</guid>
					<description>Still waiting for Dan to send his memo on how proud he his of MSNBC #s.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Still waiting for Dan to send his memo on how proud he his of MSNBC #s.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Terance</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/06/27/tuesdays-numbers-45/#comment-41461</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jun 2007 19:07:37 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/06/27/tuesdays-numbers-45/#comment-41461</guid>
					<description>Paula Zahn – 536,000 viewers (122,000)
Prime News – 467,000 viewers (238,000)

Erica Hill spanks Paula Zahn in the all important demo! And I might add, PZ has a prime spot on CNN at 8pm. Poor Erica had to get those numbers at 6pm on HLN.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Paula Zahn – 536,000 viewers (122,000)<br />
Prime News – 467,000 viewers (238,000)</p>
	<p>Erica Hill spanks Paula Zahn in the all important demo! And I might add, PZ has a prime spot on CNN at 8pm. Poor Erica had to get those numbers at 6pm on HLN.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/06/27/tuesdays-numbers-45/#comment-41460</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jun 2007 18:59:06 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/06/27/tuesdays-numbers-45/#comment-41460</guid>
					<description>Yikes, AC really fumbled his generous demo lead-in.  And expanding Prime News on HLN seemed to have been a good idea...it was #1 in the demo! 

Speaking of AC360, I have a question...I watched the 11pm hour for the first time in a long time and was curious:  does he always repeat 80% of the stories from the 10pm hour in the 11pm hour (they aren't even done live; it's the exact same tape from 10pm)...if so, that's awful.  What's the point of that?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Yikes, AC really fumbled his generous demo lead-in.  And expanding Prime News on HLN seemed to have been a good idea&#8230;it was #1 in the demo! </p>
	<p>Speaking of AC360, I have a question&#8230;I watched the 11pm hour for the first time in a long time and was curious:  does he always repeat 80% of the stories from the 10pm hour in the 11pm hour (they aren&#8217;t even done live; it&#8217;s the exact same tape from 10pm)&#8230;if so, that&#8217;s awful.  What&#8217;s the point of that?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
