<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/1.5.1-alpha" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: CNN/YouTube Debate not highest ever in 18-34 Demo&#8230;</title>
	<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/07/25/cnnyoutube-debate-not-highest-ever-in-18-34-demo/</link>
	<description>Unvarnished news &#038; opinion on cable news</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 09:40:10 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=1.5.1-alpha</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: B-Rod</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/07/25/cnnyoutube-debate-not-highest-ever-in-18-34-demo/#comment-47537</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Aug 2007 13:40:42 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/07/25/cnnyoutube-debate-not-highest-ever-in-18-34-demo/#comment-47537</guid>
					<description>You all are Fox News SUCKERS.  They tell you what to think, god forbid (if there was a god) you think for yourself.  Fox News - We Report, We Decide...SUCKERS.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>You all are Fox News SUCKERS.  They tell you what to think, god forbid (if there was a god) you think for yourself.  Fox News - We Report, We Decide&#8230;SUCKERS.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Harry</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/07/25/cnnyoutube-debate-not-highest-ever-in-18-34-demo/#comment-45140</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2007 18:25:49 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/07/25/cnnyoutube-debate-not-highest-ever-in-18-34-demo/#comment-45140</guid>
					<description>Looks like spud is getting some help.   Looks like TVN got the clarification from CNN.  It's general election numbers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Looks like spud is getting some help.   Looks like TVN got the clarification from CNN.  It&#8217;s general election numbers.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: TT</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/07/25/cnnyoutube-debate-not-highest-ever-in-18-34-demo/#comment-45133</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2007 17:41:51 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/07/25/cnnyoutube-debate-not-highest-ever-in-18-34-demo/#comment-45133</guid>
					<description>First they forget to let Paula Zahn leave with a little dignity (by letting her &quot;resign&quot; BEFORE they announce Campbell Brown's hire,) then they flat out lie about their ratings.  Again! 

CNN - The most UNTRUSTWORTHY name in news.  Period. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>First they forget to let Paula Zahn leave with a little dignity (by letting her &#8220;resign&#8221; BEFORE they announce Campbell Brown&#8217;s hire,) then they flat out lie about their ratings.  Again! </p>
	<p>CNN - The most UNTRUSTWORTHY name in news.  Period.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/07/25/cnnyoutube-debate-not-highest-ever-in-18-34-demo/#comment-45126</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2007 16:53:42 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/07/25/cnnyoutube-debate-not-highest-ever-in-18-34-demo/#comment-45126</guid>
					<description>Doug may be right, but regardless it's a bit sad that CNN has to resort to this spin overdrive...honestly, their numbers weren't that bad (IMO anyways, who knows what they were expecting).  I think they should just let this go and move on...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Doug may be right, but regardless it&#8217;s a bit sad that CNN has to resort to this spin overdrive&#8230;honestly, their numbers weren&#8217;t that bad (IMO anyways, who knows what they were expecting).  I think they should just let this go and move on&#8230;
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Spud</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/07/25/cnnyoutube-debate-not-highest-ever-in-18-34-demo/#comment-45125</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2007 16:51:19 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/07/25/cnnyoutube-debate-not-highest-ever-in-18-34-demo/#comment-45125</guid>
					<description>Who knows?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Who knows?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Doug</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/07/25/cnnyoutube-debate-not-highest-ever-in-18-34-demo/#comment-45123</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2007 16:25:23 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/07/25/cnnyoutube-debate-not-highest-ever-in-18-34-demo/#comment-45123</guid>
					<description>Maybe they mean the highest for a primary debate. The ones beating it on this list are general election debates.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Maybe they mean the highest for a primary debate. The ones beating it on this list are general election debates.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Mary Snow</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/07/25/cnnyoutube-debate-not-highest-ever-in-18-34-demo/#comment-45118</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2007 15:58:59 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/07/25/cnnyoutube-debate-not-highest-ever-in-18-34-demo/#comment-45118</guid>
					<description>I forgot to add, thanks Spud for &quot;keeping them honest&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I forgot to add, thanks Spud for &#8220;keeping them honest&#8221;.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Mary Snow</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/07/25/cnnyoutube-debate-not-highest-ever-in-18-34-demo/#comment-45117</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2007 15:58:22 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/07/25/cnnyoutube-debate-not-highest-ever-in-18-34-demo/#comment-45117</guid>
					<description>I'm sure &quot;Janice&quot; will explain it to you then maybe CNN's shill should go back to work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I&#8217;m sure &#8220;Janice&#8221; will explain it to you then maybe CNN&#8217;s shill should go back to work.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
