<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/1.5.1-alpha" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Selective Reporting?</title>
	<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/08/15/selective-reporting-3/</link>
	<description>Unvarnished news &#038; opinion on cable news</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 09:43:20 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=1.5.1-alpha</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: JMK24</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/08/15/selective-reporting-3/#comment-47872</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Aug 2007 10:35:16 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/08/15/selective-reporting-3/#comment-47872</guid>
					<description>CNNfn was led by Lou Dobbs, who is a protectionist, therefore not appealing to Biz.  As for Bloomberg... not enough personality. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>CNNfn was led by Lou Dobbs, who is a protectionist, therefore not appealing to Biz.  As for Bloomberg&#8230; not enough personality.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: TT</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/08/15/selective-reporting-3/#comment-47870</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Aug 2007 10:31:47 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/08/15/selective-reporting-3/#comment-47870</guid>
					<description>Chris has a good point.  Bloomberg, CNN fn.  It's not as if this financial news network light bulb mysteriously went off over somebody's head.  But I do think Fox will succeed. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Chris has a good point.  Bloomberg, CNN fn.  It&#8217;s not as if this financial news network light bulb mysteriously went off over somebody&#8217;s head.  But I do think Fox will succeed.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Terance</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/08/15/selective-reporting-3/#comment-47860</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Aug 2007 07:29:34 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/08/15/selective-reporting-3/#comment-47860</guid>
					<description>^ But, do you really think FBN would still want her after she purposely excluded Murdoch's new biz venture on the mother ship? My new theory is this: CNBC had EB profile Murdoch only to omit the FBN.. in hopes of &quot;needling&quot; Murdoch and attempting to sour their interest in EB. See? Two birds, one stone!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>^ But, do you really think FBN would still want her after she purposely excluded Murdoch&#8217;s new biz venture on the mother ship? My new theory is this: CNBC had EB profile Murdoch only to omit the FBN.. in hopes of &#8220;needling&#8221; Murdoch and attempting to sour their interest in EB. See? Two birds, one stone!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Terance</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/08/15/selective-reporting-3/#comment-47804</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Aug 2007 19:23:00 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/08/15/selective-reporting-3/#comment-47804</guid>
					<description>Wait! You mean to tell me the &quot;ever so luscious Erin Burnett&quot; didn't mention how many newspapers Murdoch sold yesterday? Sheesh! Try this on for size: Maybe CNBC didn't want their talent advertising FBN on The Today Show. Plus, the network isn't even available yet! Further, CNBC talks about FBN/Murdoch quite often... just look for David Faber. So, its not like their totally ignoring them or anything. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Wait! You mean to tell me the &#8220;ever so luscious Erin Burnett&#8221; didn&#8217;t mention how many newspapers Murdoch sold yesterday? Sheesh! Try this on for size: Maybe CNBC didn&#8217;t want their talent advertising FBN on The Today Show. Plus, the network isn&#8217;t even available yet! Further, CNBC talks about FBN/Murdoch quite often&#8230; just look for David Faber. So, its not like their totally ignoring them or anything.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Chris (clind)</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/08/15/selective-reporting-3/#comment-47803</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Aug 2007 19:14:46 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/08/15/selective-reporting-3/#comment-47803</guid>
					<description>Well, let's see.....

&lt;i&gt;&quot;CNBC will be confronted with its first direct competition for business news audiences&quot;&lt;/i&gt;

Um....hasn't Bloomberg been around for years? Plus, wasn't CNNfn also competition to CNBC for viewers? From the point of it should be mentioned, that seems valid though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Well, let&#8217;s see&#8230;..</p>
	<p><i>&#8220;CNBC will be confronted with its first direct competition for business news audiences&#8221;</i></p>
	<p>Um&#8230;.hasn&#8217;t Bloomberg been around for years? Plus, wasn&#8217;t CNNfn also competition to CNBC for viewers? From the point of it should be mentioned, that seems valid though.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/08/15/selective-reporting-3/#comment-47798</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Aug 2007 19:01:32 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/08/15/selective-reporting-3/#comment-47798</guid>
					<description>*patiently waits for Chickadee to come and say CNBC is going to shut down by Christmas*</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>*patiently waits for Chickadee to come and say CNBC is going to shut down by Christmas*
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: bigred</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/08/15/selective-reporting-3/#comment-47797</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Aug 2007 19:01:09 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/08/15/selective-reporting-3/#comment-47797</guid>
					<description>Full disclosure and admitting potential conflicts of interest are consistently lacking in our media culture.  This is one example in a sea full of them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Full disclosure and admitting potential conflicts of interest are consistently lacking in our media culture.  This is one example in a sea full of them.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
