Inside Cable News

August 28, 2007

Abrams vs. Amanpour: Update…

As ICN first reported last night, Dan Abrams took on Christiane Amanpour and CNN over their God’s Warriors documentary specials. Partial transcript follows…(transcript via NewsBusters)

UPDATE: CAMERA has the video

UPDATE2: Eat the Press’ Rachel Sklar seems to be siding with Abrams…

DAN ABRAMS: For the past week, CNN has been proudly promoting and then celebrating its series called God’s Warriors, presumably a look at radicals of different religions willing to fight for their cause. My take: I think it’s fair to say it was not what it claimed or promised to be.

CHRISTIANE AMANPOUR: So we’re not here lobbying for or advocating for or drawing conclusions, either political, religious or ideological-

ABRAMS: Oh, yes they did. CNN should have called it what it was: a defense of Islamic fundamentalism and the worst type of moral relativism. For each of three nights, CNN devoted two hours to the, quote, “warriors” of each religion: Jewish, Christian and Muslim. But rather than distinguish between Islamic terrorists who utilize fierce violence to achieve warped goals, and the merely fiercely religious or even just those who fiercely believe in the state of Israel, Christiane Amanpour avoided getting bogged down in objectivity. Christians and Jews, for example, who support Israel’s strategy for self-defense are just as much God’s warriors, according to Amanpour, as the Islamic radicals who blow themselves and others up in an effort to destroy the world as we know it. A handful of the most radical of the Jews and Christians who can almost all be identified by name are highlighted. The violent Islamic fundamentalists are, quote, “understood,” with no comparable effort to “understand” the evangelical Christians or Israelis. Amanpour even offers an explanation for the angry radical Islamists. She blames the warrior Jews.

AMANPOUR: Muslims, like people everywhere, abhor terrorism. The small minority who resorts to violence is symptomatic of something many of us have failed to understand: the impact of God’s Jewish warriors goes far beyond these rocky hills. The Jewish settlements have inflamed much of the Muslim world.

ABRAMS: She takes Jewish and Christian political movements, even Jewish lobbyists in Congress, and lumps them in with God’s warriors, thereby equating them with the radical Muslim warriors, the quote, “much feared and little understood.” Maybe most troubling, much of the warrior Muslim program highlights not the warriors themselves, but claims of discrimination against Muslims.

AMANPOUR: Geneive Abdo is the author of Mecca and Main Street. She says that since 9/11, the majority of American Muslims feel they’re singled out for suspicion and surveillance by the government and by ordinary people. Imam Fawaz Jneid, leader of a mosque in the Hague, believes Muslims are under attack, victims of religious discrimination.

ABRAMS: What does that have to do with the warriors? She portrays Muslims as victims, while accusing evangelical Christians of playing the victim.

AMANPOUR: The religious right would have you believe that there’s no mention of God anywhere in our public sphere. It’s on the currency.

JEFFREY TOOBIN, CNN Legal Analyst: It’s on the currency, and they say because it’s on the currency, there’s nothing wrong with it being in the schools, or in the courthouses, or in the Capitol.

AMANPOUR: But they also play the victim somewhat.

ABRAMS: This series was well-produced and successful, but also shameful advocacy masked as journalism. We have opinionated hosts here on MSNBC who offer opinions on a wide range of topics, including me, but I admit it when I’m advocating. In the end, this was exactly what she said it wasn’t: lobbying, advocacy, and an effort, intentional or not, to have people draw particular conclusions.

Filed under: Cable News, MSNBC, CNN - Spud

10 Comments »

TrackBack: http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/08/28/abrams-vs-amanpour-2/trackback/

  1. Isn’t Dan Abrams Jewish? I’d probably be more interested in what Wolf Blitzer had to say about it… seeing that he’s not working at a competing network. In other words since Wolf & Dan are both Jewish, I’d put more “stock” in Wolf’s (opinion) *if* he criticized his own network. Because the “cable warriors” who lash out at each other on a regular basis are obviously more concerned with mud slinging than any sort of truth squad.

    Comment by Terance — August 28, 2007 @ 9:21 am

  2. I missed Dan’s show. Will it be run again?

    tia

    Comment by A.M. — August 28, 2007 @ 9:32 am

  3. Newsbusters.org has an extended set of reader comments posted regarding Dan’s show last night. Good stuff.

    Comment by Cella — August 28, 2007 @ 9:53 am

  4. Terance, I’d agree with you there, and for that matter, the one panelist that Islamic was talked over time and time again. Even so, watching most of Dan’s show last night seemed better than listening to H&C yell about the Vick thing supposedly be about race and the King talking to some people about the case.

    Comment by Chris (clind) — August 28, 2007 @ 11:26 am

  5. It’s not often I agree with Abrams, but even a blind squirrel finds a nut occasionally.

    Amanpour displays the typical liberal mindset of the day. Much like Rosie O’Donnell…. claiming Christians are just as much a threat to our country as radical Islamists.

    This crap makes me sick. In their view, it’s never the fault of the idiots who blow up hundreds of innocent people. It’s the Americans’ fault, or Israel’s fault.

    Comment by bigred — August 28, 2007 @ 11:27 am

  6. Hotair.com has the video:

    Comment by bigred — August 28, 2007 @ 11:40 am

  7. Chris: I disagree with your assessment that “one panelist that (was) Islamic was talked over time and time again.”

    In fact, she was given several opportunites to speak. She just wouldn’t stop! She was the one who was talking over the others.

    Comment by William — August 28, 2007 @ 11:45 am

  8. Hot Air’s source was the same video from the same source as the one I already posted.

    Comment by Spud — August 28, 2007 @ 11:46 am

  9. Dan’s selective outrage leaves him with little credibility. If he wants to build any credibility he will have take on more than one issue. Its rich territory and a good place to start would be with an analysis of Bill Moyers work at PBS. Of course if he dared to do that he may be left off the guest list of the politically correct cocktail parties

    Comment by steve L — August 28, 2007 @ 1:26 pm

  10. I found a God’s Warrior, that Christiane didn’t cover, Ssg Darrell Ray Griffin Jr., “Malleus Dei” God’s Hammer. He was fighting on the frontlines in Iraq, when he was killed.

    http://digg.com/political_opinion/Malleus_Dei_The_story_of_SSG_Darrell_Griffin

    Comment by Ree — August 29, 2007 @ 9:54 am

RSS feed for comments on this post.

Leave a comment



Anti-spam measure: please retype the above text into the box provided.

Get free blog up and running in minutes with Blogsome | Theme designs available here