<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/1.5.1-alpha" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Thursday&#8217;s Numbers&#8230;</title>
	<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/09/21/thursdays-numbers-57/</link>
	<description>Unvarnished news &#038; opinion on cable news</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 07 May 2013 19:45:41 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=1.5.1-alpha</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: tattletale</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/09/21/thursdays-numbers-57/#comment-51918</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2007 08:57:41 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/09/21/thursdays-numbers-57/#comment-51918</guid>
					<description>When you look at listener numbers, if correct, you can see why any of the CNBC personalities would like to jump to FNC. It would triple their audience....Fox has been growing like a weed and they definitely have the money for both &quot;honeys&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>When you look at listener numbers, if correct, you can see why any of the CNBC personalities would like to jump to FNC. It would triple their audience&#8230;.Fox has been growing like a weed and they definitely have the money for both &#8220;honeys&#8221;.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Pat</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/09/21/thursdays-numbers-57/#comment-51868</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Sep 2007 11:41:02 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/09/21/thursdays-numbers-57/#comment-51868</guid>
					<description>96k Thurs for Olberman?  they should drop him.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>96k Thurs for Olberman?  they should drop him.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: moonbeam</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/09/21/thursdays-numbers-57/#comment-51842</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Sep 2007 18:55:11 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/09/21/thursdays-numbers-57/#comment-51842</guid>
					<description>I enjoyed Willie on MJ this week until Mika opened her mouth and ruined the show as usual.  That new guy on there adds nothing either.  
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I enjoyed Willie on MJ this week until Mika opened her mouth and ruined the show as usual.  That new guy on there adds nothing either.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: cas</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/09/21/thursdays-numbers-57/#comment-51780</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Sep 2007 07:08:57 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/09/21/thursdays-numbers-57/#comment-51780</guid>
					<description>mourning joe's numbers are erratic...up/down..up/down..up/down.  this demonstrates he doesn't have a loyal audience.  when imus returns mj's numbers will, permanently, be in the toilet..where they belong.  he's a terrible interviewer, and he's humorless.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>mourning joe&#8217;s numbers are erratic&#8230;up/down..up/down..up/down.  this demonstrates he doesn&#8217;t have a loyal audience.  when imus returns mj&#8217;s numbers will, permanently, be in the toilet..where they belong.  he&#8217;s a terrible interviewer, and he&#8217;s humorless.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: ImNotBlue</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/09/21/thursdays-numbers-57/#comment-51764</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2007 22:14:09 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/09/21/thursdays-numbers-57/#comment-51764</guid>
					<description>How is it stupid?  It's snarky... but I still don't see stupid.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>How is it stupid?  It&#8217;s snarky&#8230; but I still don&#8217;t see stupid.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: randy</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/09/21/thursdays-numbers-57/#comment-51762</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2007 22:03:14 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/09/21/thursdays-numbers-57/#comment-51762</guid>
					<description>Mike, please do not include OJ with Jena 6.  The two are in completely different.  The second one is so much more important than the other.  

Technically his answer is right Inb, but it still doesnt dismiss the stupidity of the statement.  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Mike, please do not include OJ with Jena 6.  The two are in completely different.  The second one is so much more important than the other.  </p>
	<p>Technically his answer is right Inb, but it still doesnt dismiss the stupidity of the statement.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Mike</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/09/21/thursdays-numbers-57/#comment-51760</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2007 21:32:23 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/09/21/thursdays-numbers-57/#comment-51760</guid>
					<description>I'm pleased that Keith Olbermann is one of the only ones who doesn't bow to ratings pressure and do wall to wall coverage of things like the OJ or the Jena 6 stories. I had A Cooper on the other night and I believe the entire 60 minutes was about OJ.  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I&#8217;m pleased that Keith Olbermann is one of the only ones who doesn&#8217;t bow to ratings pressure and do wall to wall coverage of things like the OJ or the Jena 6 stories. I had A Cooper on the other night and I believe the entire 60 minutes was about OJ.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: puck</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/09/21/thursdays-numbers-57/#comment-51759</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2007 21:28:20 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/09/21/thursdays-numbers-57/#comment-51759</guid>
					<description>Randy, 3rd place. I guess the 'Purple Power Tie' didn't work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Randy, 3rd place. I guess the &#8216;Purple Power Tie&#8217; didn&#8217;t work.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: ImNotBlue</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/09/21/thursdays-numbers-57/#comment-51753</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2007 20:43:27 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/09/21/thursdays-numbers-57/#comment-51753</guid>
					<description>randy... his comment may be snarky... but it isn't wrong, is it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>randy&#8230; his comment may be snarky&#8230; but it isn&#8217;t wrong, is it?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Melinda</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/09/21/thursdays-numbers-57/#comment-51746</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2007 20:06:45 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/09/21/thursdays-numbers-57/#comment-51746</guid>
					<description>It was Jena Six and I am as interested in that story as many white americans are interested in OJ. It is probably tribal on all of our parts but I know they probably had a huge black viewership. A lot of the black entertainment and political bloggers I visit have been linking to CNN for coverage of this story and I am sure the Lou Dobbs Glenn Beck hater network noticed that there are &quot;other&quot; americans out there interested in something other than OJ or Britney. 

I thought Kyra Phillips was going to be biased b/c she seems more conservative  but she actually did  a great job of presenting BOTH sides and she was fair. In an age where everyone has an opinion and think you want to know it she she stuck to the facts and presented a balanced report... great job!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>It was Jena Six and I am as interested in that story as many white americans are interested in OJ. It is probably tribal on all of our parts but I know they probably had a huge black viewership. A lot of the black entertainment and political bloggers I visit have been linking to CNN for coverage of this story and I am sure the Lou Dobbs Glenn Beck hater network noticed that there are &#8220;other&#8221; americans out there interested in something other than OJ or Britney. </p>
	<p>I thought Kyra Phillips was going to be biased b/c she seems more conservative  but she actually did  a great job of presenting BOTH sides and she was fair. In an age where everyone has an opinion and think you want to know it she she stuck to the facts and presented a balanced report&#8230; great job!!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/09/21/thursdays-numbers-57/#comment-51740</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2007 19:51:40 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/09/21/thursdays-numbers-57/#comment-51740</guid>
					<description>I'd be upset at your comment, randy...but I've read your posts here before and I don't think anyone would be rushing to label them as &quot;smart&quot;...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I&#8217;d be upset at your comment, randy&#8230;but I&#8217;ve read your posts here before and I don&#8217;t think anyone would be rushing to label them as &#8220;smart&#8221;&#8230;
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: randy</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/09/21/thursdays-numbers-57/#comment-51734</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2007 19:39:41 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/09/21/thursdays-numbers-57/#comment-51734</guid>
					<description>Oh anonymous and your stupid posts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Oh anonymous and your stupid posts.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/09/21/thursdays-numbers-57/#comment-51732</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2007 19:35:39 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/09/21/thursdays-numbers-57/#comment-51732</guid>
					<description>Wow welcome back Olbermann...to 3rd place! </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Wow welcome back Olbermann&#8230;to 3rd place!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Terance</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/09/21/thursdays-numbers-57/#comment-51731</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2007 19:34:01 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/09/21/thursdays-numbers-57/#comment-51731</guid>
					<description>Missy, it was Jena 6 with Kyra. But, I'm not interested in that story and didn't watch.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Missy, it was Jena 6 with Kyra. But, I&#8217;m not interested in that story and didn&#8217;t watch.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Missy</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/09/21/thursdays-numbers-57/#comment-51730</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2007 19:32:19 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/09/21/thursdays-numbers-57/#comment-51730</guid>
					<description>I should have said &quot;Special Investigations&quot; came in second, with Keith in third, in total viewers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I should have said &#8220;Special Investigations&#8221; came in second, with Keith in third, in total viewers.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Missy</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/09/21/thursdays-numbers-57/#comment-51729</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2007 19:29:59 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/09/21/thursdays-numbers-57/#comment-51729</guid>
					<description>It wasn't O'Reilly or Olbermann who won the &quot;demo&quot; on Thursday, but CNN's Special Investigations!  And it came in second place, with Keith in third.

Is this Caffety's program?  If not, what was the subject of the investigation?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>It wasn&#8217;t O&#8217;Reilly or Olbermann who won the &#8220;demo&#8221; on Thursday, but CNN&#8217;s Special Investigations!  And it came in second place, with Keith in third.</p>
	<p>Is this Caffety&#8217;s program?  If not, what was the subject of the investigation?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Terance</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/09/21/thursdays-numbers-57/#comment-51728</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2007 19:29:14 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/09/21/thursdays-numbers-57/#comment-51728</guid>
					<description>From my view it looks like Kitty Pilgrim lambasted Brit Hume in the coveted demo, eh.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>From my view it looks like Kitty Pilgrim lambasted Brit Hume in the coveted demo, eh.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Obama in 08!</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/09/21/thursdays-numbers-57/#comment-51726</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2007 19:23:37 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/09/21/thursdays-numbers-57/#comment-51726</guid>
					<description>My goodness, Mourning Joe keeps sinking lower...even with Willie Giest!

It will be interesting to see Olbermann's numbers again after the SNF bump...his special comment thursday numbers seem about average or seem to leveling off some. I think he is going to repeat the special comment today, so maybe he'll have a good Friday.

One thing, people do want news (at least the demo folks), CNN did very well with the Jena 6 coverage.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>My goodness, Mourning Joe keeps sinking lower&#8230;even with Willie Giest!</p>
	<p>It will be interesting to see Olbermann&#8217;s numbers again after the SNF bump&#8230;his special comment thursday numbers seem about average or seem to leveling off some. I think he is going to repeat the special comment today, so maybe he&#8217;ll have a good Friday.</p>
	<p>One thing, people do want news (at least the demo folks), CNN did very well with the Jena 6 coverage.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
