<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/1.5.1-alpha" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Monday&#8217;s Numbers&#8230;</title>
	<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/09/25/mondays-numbers-72/</link>
	<description>Unvarnished news &#038; opinion on cable news</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 10:54:50 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=1.5.1-alpha</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Nobody</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/09/25/mondays-numbers-72/#comment-52266</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2007 22:39:16 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/09/25/mondays-numbers-72/#comment-52266</guid>
					<description>Dan Abrams lost nearly half of Keith Olbermann's audience.  I wonder how the daily MSNBC ratings wrap is spinning it to make it look like the timeslot is winning... I'm guessing somewhere after the truth of the loss of audience, it says in blue, bold text; &quot;...the timeslot is still up 93% compared to the same time in 1996&quot;. 

It's such a joke. The sad truth is, MSNBC would probably keep more of Olbermann's audience if they would start the doc block an hour earlier... which I predict they will do... Abrams, like all other talent is going to get 6 months at 9PM and then that slot is history.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Dan Abrams lost nearly half of Keith Olbermann&#8217;s audience.  I wonder how the daily MSNBC ratings wrap is spinning it to make it look like the timeslot is winning&#8230; I&#8217;m guessing somewhere after the truth of the loss of audience, it says in blue, bold text; &#8220;&#8230;the timeslot is still up 93% compared to the same time in 1996&#8243;. </p>
	<p>It&#8217;s such a joke. The sad truth is, MSNBC would probably keep more of Olbermann&#8217;s audience if they would start the doc block an hour earlier&#8230; which I predict they will do&#8230; Abrams, like all other talent is going to get 6 months at 9PM and then that slot is history.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Aaron</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/09/25/mondays-numbers-72/#comment-52237</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2007 21:20:14 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/09/25/mondays-numbers-72/#comment-52237</guid>
					<description>Tucker had about 100,000 more viewers with David Shuster hosting than Tucker normally pulls.  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Tucker had about 100,000 more viewers with David Shuster hosting than Tucker normally pulls.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Ira</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/09/25/mondays-numbers-72/#comment-52209</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2007 19:52:19 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/09/25/mondays-numbers-72/#comment-52209</guid>
					<description>An awful prime time for CNN.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>An awful prime time for CNN.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
