<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/1.5.1-alpha" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: CNN.com tops Weather.com and Wikipedia to claim number one spot according to Nielsen.</title>
	<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/10/15/cnncom-tops-weathercom-and-wikipedia-to-claim-number-one-spot-according-to-nielsen/</link>
	<description>Unvarnished news &#038; opinion on cable news</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 00:14:09 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=1.5.1-alpha</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: myview</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/10/15/cnncom-tops-weathercom-and-wikipedia-to-claim-number-one-spot-according-to-nielsen/#comment-55159</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2007 18:02:57 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/10/15/cnncom-tops-weathercom-and-wikipedia-to-claim-number-one-spot-according-to-nielsen/#comment-55159</guid>
					<description>I highly doubt it has anything to do with age but simply that it is inferior to the other websites.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I highly doubt it has anything to do with age but simply that it is inferior to the other websites.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: ImNotBlue</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/10/15/cnncom-tops-weathercom-and-wikipedia-to-claim-number-one-spot-according-to-nielsen/#comment-55129</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2007 15:31:44 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/10/15/cnncom-tops-weathercom-and-wikipedia-to-claim-number-one-spot-according-to-nielsen/#comment-55129</guid>
					<description>I'm not arguing with the fact that their site sucks.  It does... there's no debating it.

But saying that they get a low hit count because their audience is &quot;older&quot; is an unfounded claim.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I&#8217;m not arguing with the fact that their site sucks.  It does&#8230; there&#8217;s no debating it.</p>
	<p>But saying that they get a low hit count because their audience is &#8220;older&#8221; is an unfounded claim.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Sam</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/10/15/cnncom-tops-weathercom-and-wikipedia-to-claim-number-one-spot-according-to-nielsen/#comment-55126</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2007 15:21:13 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/10/15/cnncom-tops-weathercom-and-wikipedia-to-claim-number-one-spot-according-to-nielsen/#comment-55126</guid>
					<description>INB out of all the three Cable News Channels, FNC.com has the lowest online following/ hits- that's not even questionable. Infact i didn't even have to look it up as it is pretty well known. Their online site sucks plain and simple.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>INB out of all the three Cable News Channels, FNC.com has the lowest online following/ hits- that&#8217;s not even questionable. Infact i didn&#8217;t even have to look it up as it is pretty well known. Their online site sucks plain and simple.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: ImNotBlue</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/10/15/cnncom-tops-weathercom-and-wikipedia-to-claim-number-one-spot-according-to-nielsen/#comment-55117</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2007 14:57:34 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/10/15/cnncom-tops-weathercom-and-wikipedia-to-claim-number-one-spot-according-to-nielsen/#comment-55117</guid>
					<description>I like that you drew that conclusion without any facts or evidence to support your claim, &quot;Me&quot;.

Must be nice to feel that smart... but I guess you don't have any facts or evidence for that either.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I like that you drew that conclusion without any facts or evidence to support your claim, &#8220;Me&#8221;.</p>
	<p>Must be nice to feel that smart&#8230; but I guess you don&#8217;t have any facts or evidence for that either.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Me</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/10/15/cnncom-tops-weathercom-and-wikipedia-to-claim-number-one-spot-according-to-nielsen/#comment-55114</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2007 14:38:43 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/10/15/cnncom-tops-weathercom-and-wikipedia-to-claim-number-one-spot-according-to-nielsen/#comment-55114</guid>
					<description>where does fnc fall in the .com ratings?  they are down in the cellar.  Just goes to show ya fnc's old audience aren't intenet savvy.  maybe murdoch should help install computers in the senior citizen's centers around the country huh?  and shane don't know where you have been but ted isn't over cnn anymore.  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>where does fnc fall in the .com ratings?  they are down in the cellar.  Just goes to show ya fnc&#8217;s old audience aren&#8217;t intenet savvy.  maybe murdoch should help install computers in the senior citizen&#8217;s centers around the country huh?  and shane don&#8217;t know where you have been but ted isn&#8217;t over cnn anymore.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: SHANE</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/10/15/cnncom-tops-weathercom-and-wikipedia-to-claim-number-one-spot-according-to-nielsen/#comment-55105</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2007 13:20:36 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/10/15/cnncom-tops-weathercom-and-wikipedia-to-claim-number-one-spot-according-to-nielsen/#comment-55105</guid>
					<description>Are you telling me CNN is giving up? FOX won the war? But it's not over yet TED. We want to rape and pillage a bit. HEE HEE!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Are you telling me CNN is giving up? FOX won the war? But it&#8217;s not over yet TED. We want to rape and pillage a bit. HEE HEE!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
