<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/1.5.1-alpha" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Friday&#8217;s Numbers&#8230;</title>
	<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/10/15/fridays-numbers-69/</link>
	<description>Unvarnished news &#038; opinion on cable news</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 06 Dec 2009 19:09:23 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=1.5.1-alpha</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: flappy</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/10/15/fridays-numbers-69/#comment-55232</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2007 23:19:22 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/10/15/fridays-numbers-69/#comment-55232</guid>
					<description>&quot;Dead Air America&quot;  LOL

Holy cow, looks like Glenn Beck had some of his his best ratings ever!  

Matthews bit.
Olbermann slurped.
Fox tooled both of'em.

  

   </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>&#8220;Dead Air America&#8221;  LOL</p>
	<p>Holy cow, looks like Glenn Beck had some of his his best ratings ever!  </p>
	<p>Matthews bit.<br />
Olbermann slurped.<br />
Fox tooled both of&#8217;em.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Grandpa D</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/10/15/fridays-numbers-69/#comment-55228</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2007 22:44:07 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/10/15/fridays-numbers-69/#comment-55228</guid>
					<description>17. ^  Glenn's one guest, and subject, was evangelist John Hagee.  Rating surprised me to.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>17. ^  Glenn&#8217;s one guest, and subject, was evangelist John Hagee.  Rating surprised me to.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Rene Yamin</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/10/15/fridays-numbers-69/#comment-55222</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2007 21:46:21 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/10/15/fridays-numbers-69/#comment-55222</guid>
					<description>What happens if Sanchez's numbers keep going up.  What will they do in once C. Brown starts?  Where would they put Sanchez now that Dobbs is on at 7 and Wolf is on from 4-7?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>What happens if Sanchez&#8217;s numbers keep going up.  What will they do in once C. Brown starts?  Where would they put Sanchez now that Dobbs is on at 7 and Wolf is on from 4-7?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Aaron</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/10/15/fridays-numbers-69/#comment-55216</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2007 21:16:52 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/10/15/fridays-numbers-69/#comment-55216</guid>
					<description>dobbs more demo than tucker total</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>dobbs more demo than tucker total
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Sal Jr</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/10/15/fridays-numbers-69/#comment-55213</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2007 21:10:56 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/10/15/fridays-numbers-69/#comment-55213</guid>
					<description>wow! look at Glenn Beck's numbers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>wow! look at Glenn Beck&#8217;s numbers.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Alison</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/10/15/fridays-numbers-69/#comment-55204</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2007 20:28:24 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/10/15/fridays-numbers-69/#comment-55204</guid>
					<description>Sanchez's numbers continue to improve. And they are up in the demo. Hmmmm is right! </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Sanchez&#8217;s numbers continue to improve. And they are up in the demo. Hmmmm is right!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Mike</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/10/15/fridays-numbers-69/#comment-55202</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2007 20:20:33 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/10/15/fridays-numbers-69/#comment-55202</guid>
					<description>My comcast system doesn't it here (Norwich CT).
 
One of the users at dslreports.com had a chat with comcast about FBN in the New England region. 
http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r19262649-Re-fox-business-channel</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>My comcast system doesn&#8217;t it here (Norwich CT).</p>
	<p>One of the users at dslreports.com had a chat with comcast about FBN in the New England region.<br />
<a >http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r19262649-Re-fox-business-channel</a>
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/10/15/fridays-numbers-69/#comment-55192</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2007 19:35:09 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/10/15/fridays-numbers-69/#comment-55192</guid>
					<description>Gregg...the debate was a RERUN from earlier last week.  Chillax.  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Gregg&#8230;the debate was a RERUN from earlier last week.  Chillax.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Terance</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/10/15/fridays-numbers-69/#comment-55191</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2007 19:34:48 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/10/15/fridays-numbers-69/#comment-55191</guid>
					<description>I read on TVN that Liz' non compete is up on Wednesday.. that's funny because I thought a while back it was said to be today.. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I read on TVN that Liz&#8217; non compete is up on Wednesday.. that&#8217;s funny because I thought a while back it was said to be today..
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/10/15/fridays-numbers-69/#comment-55188</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2007 19:30:07 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/10/15/fridays-numbers-69/#comment-55188</guid>
					<description>Yeah I'm surprised.  Maybe they're holding her back to next week...you know, spread out the goodies?  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Yeah I&#8217;m surprised.  Maybe they&#8217;re holding her back to next week&#8230;you know, spread out the goodies?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Haile Welde</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/10/15/fridays-numbers-69/#comment-55186</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2007 19:28:21 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/10/15/fridays-numbers-69/#comment-55186</guid>
					<description>Not a peep about Liz Claman today? If she's to join the network, I would've thought it'd make the biggest PR wave if they announced her today, even if she doesn't do any anchoring right away.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Not a peep about Liz Claman today? If she&#8217;s to join the network, I would&#8217;ve thought it&#8217;d make the biggest PR wave if they announced her today, even if she doesn&#8217;t do any anchoring right away.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/10/15/fridays-numbers-69/#comment-55184</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2007 19:25:25 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/10/15/fridays-numbers-69/#comment-55184</guid>
					<description>Oh sorry to hear that Sophia :(

We don't have access to it here in Canada at all (legally), but I have a &quot;grey dish&quot; so I was able to catch it on that.  To be honest, you didn't miss THAT much...was a tad let down considering all the hype (or at least the hype in my head LOL).  But when Liz jumps on the 2-5 shift, you can bet I'll be glued!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Oh sorry to hear that Sophia :(</p>
	<p>We don&#8217;t have access to it here in Canada at all (legally), but I have a &#8220;grey dish&#8221; so I was able to catch it on that.  To be honest, you didn&#8217;t miss THAT much&#8230;was a tad let down considering all the hype (or at least the hype in my head LOL).  But when Liz jumps on the 2-5 shift, you can bet I&#8217;ll be glued!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Haile Welde</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/10/15/fridays-numbers-69/#comment-55183</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2007 19:23:36 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/10/15/fridays-numbers-69/#comment-55183</guid>
					<description>I don't have access to it either. It's the biggest new channel distribution in the history of cable (34 million homes), but alas, even that doesn't mean penetration of most markets.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I don&#8217;t have access to it either. It&#8217;s the biggest new channel distribution in the history of cable (34 million homes), but alas, even that doesn&#8217;t mean penetration of most markets.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Terance</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/10/15/fridays-numbers-69/#comment-55182</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2007 19:23:30 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/10/15/fridays-numbers-69/#comment-55182</guid>
					<description>Sophia, Directv has it. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Sophia, Directv has it.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Cathy</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/10/15/fridays-numbers-69/#comment-55181</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2007 19:22:37 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/10/15/fridays-numbers-69/#comment-55181</guid>
					<description>I found it this morning and it was on channel 124 with time warner.  I did not watch long and switched back to fox and friends. I saw David S. on Morning Joe, gagged and turn to F&amp;amp;F.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I found it this morning and it was on channel 124 with time warner.  I did not watch long and switched back to fox and friends. I saw David S. on Morning Joe, gagged and turn to F&amp;F.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: sophia</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/10/15/fridays-numbers-69/#comment-55173</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2007 19:06:57 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/10/15/fridays-numbers-69/#comment-55173</guid>
					<description>I was all looking forward to it this morning but alas, our cable provider, Cox Cable, doesn't have it yet.  I called them and they said they want to wait and see how their ratings are - so - I guess this means it will be awhile, if ever. Do most of you have access to it?  Just curious... This was so disappointing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I was all looking forward to it this morning but alas, our cable provider, Cox Cable, doesn&#8217;t have it yet.  I called them and they said they want to wait and see how their ratings are - so - I guess this means it will be awhile, if ever. Do most of you have access to it?  Just curious&#8230; This was so disappointing.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Gregg Smith</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/10/15/fridays-numbers-69/#comment-55164</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2007 18:22:53 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/10/15/fridays-numbers-69/#comment-55164</guid>
					<description>How about Chris Matthews's hosting of the latest Pres. Debate - 257,000 viewers, ouch !!!! Looks like the two least watched Pres. Debates were hosted by Olbermann and Chris Matthews.  These two liberal America Haters are ready for jobs at Dead Air America.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>How about Chris Matthews&#8217;s hosting of the latest Pres. Debate - 257,000 viewers, ouch !!!! Looks like the two least watched Pres. Debates were hosted by Olbermann and Chris Matthews.  These two liberal America Haters are ready for jobs at Dead Air America.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Haile Welde</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/10/15/fridays-numbers-69/#comment-55163</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2007 18:10:36 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/10/15/fridays-numbers-69/#comment-55163</guid>
					<description>Not for 6 or 9 months. As a new network, ratings are meaningless until they broaden their distribution, and more Americans discover the channel exists, and that it's relevant for them and doesn't actually sound like CNBC. I understand Nielsen will provide FOX Biz the viewership information privately, to see what programs work better than others, but it's ratings won't become public until the network's worked out most of it's kinks, played around with it's programming, etc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Not for 6 or 9 months. As a new network, ratings are meaningless until they broaden their distribution, and more Americans discover the channel exists, and that it&#8217;s relevant for them and doesn&#8217;t actually sound like CNBC. I understand Nielsen will provide FOX Biz the viewership information privately, to see what programs work better than others, but it&#8217;s ratings won&#8217;t become public until the network&#8217;s worked out most of it&#8217;s kinks, played around with it&#8217;s programming, etc.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Jan Gomez</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/10/15/fridays-numbers-69/#comment-55160</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2007 18:03:11 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/10/15/fridays-numbers-69/#comment-55160</guid>
					<description>Oberman demos: 177,000, Sanchez: 176,000

hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Oberman demos: 177,000, Sanchez: 176,000</p>
	<p>hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/10/15/fridays-numbers-69/#comment-55157</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2007 17:59:05 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/10/15/fridays-numbers-69/#comment-55157</guid>
					<description>Not for a while...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Not for a while&#8230;
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: clak</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/10/15/fridays-numbers-69/#comment-55155</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2007 17:53:11 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/10/15/fridays-numbers-69/#comment-55155</guid>
					<description>How soon until we get FBN ratings??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>How soon until we get FBN ratings??
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
