<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/1.5.1-alpha" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Monday&#8217;s Numbers&#8230;.</title>
	<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/10/23/mondays-numbers-76/</link>
	<description>Unvarnished news &#038; opinion on cable news</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 10:06:10 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=1.5.1-alpha</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Ree</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/10/23/mondays-numbers-76/#comment-56726</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2007 21:53:10 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/10/23/mondays-numbers-76/#comment-56726</guid>
					<description>I was watching Rick Sanchez till he had his media matters moment, and they had on that fellow what's his name, that called Juan Williams a &quot;Happy Negro&quot; That was it for me, I thought Sanchez had a core before that incident. 

Oh yeah Morning Joe, what I said before, I can't recount how many times.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I was watching Rick Sanchez till he had his media matters moment, and they had on that fellow what&#8217;s his name, that called Juan Williams a &#8220;Happy Negro&#8221; That was it for me, I thought Sanchez had a core before that incident. </p>
	<p>Oh yeah Morning Joe, what I said before, I can&#8217;t recount how many times.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Rich</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/10/23/mondays-numbers-76/#comment-56654</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2007 15:08:13 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/10/23/mondays-numbers-76/#comment-56654</guid>
					<description>Can't wait til KO starts adding Rick to WORST PERSON.  If he keeps adding the people who beat him in the ratings...it won't be long before Spongebob &amp;amp; patrick make the countdown.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Can&#8217;t wait til KO starts adding Rick to WORST PERSON.  If he keeps adding the people who beat him in the ratings&#8230;it won&#8217;t be long before Spongebob &amp; patrick make the countdown.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: ImNotBlue</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/10/23/mondays-numbers-76/#comment-56649</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2007 14:54:41 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/10/23/mondays-numbers-76/#comment-56649</guid>
					<description>Well... either him or Willy Wonka.

I can't imagine too many other people thinking it looks good.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Well&#8230; either him or Willy Wonka.</p>
	<p>I can&#8217;t imagine too many other people thinking it looks good.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Obama in 08!</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/10/23/mondays-numbers-76/#comment-56629</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2007 11:55:37 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/10/23/mondays-numbers-76/#comment-56629</guid>
					<description>ImNotBlue, I remember seeing a pic of Olbermann in the &quot;inside story of ESPN&quot; book, where he was applying his own make-up...perhaps he is still doing it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>ImNotBlue, I remember seeing a pic of Olbermann in the &#8220;inside story of ESPN&#8221; book, where he was applying his own make-up&#8230;perhaps he is still doing it?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: ImNotBlue</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/10/23/mondays-numbers-76/#comment-56623</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2007 10:43:49 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/10/23/mondays-numbers-76/#comment-56623</guid>
					<description>Obama... it has been noted time and time again over at Olbermann Watch that Keith looks orange.  Don't know what it is... maybe too many carrots.  But it appears as though this is a frequent problem.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Obama&#8230; it has been noted time and time again over at Olbermann Watch that Keith looks orange.  Don&#8217;t know what it is&#8230; maybe too many carrots.  But it appears as though this is a frequent problem.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Obama in 08!</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/10/23/mondays-numbers-76/#comment-56615</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2007 10:20:09 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/10/23/mondays-numbers-76/#comment-56615</guid>
					<description>I finally got to watch Countdown's Monday show. Two suggestions Countdown producers: first, tone down the make-up on Olbermann, he looked really orange that night. Second, if Olbermann is going to do segments where he is standing (like on SNF) he needs to get on the treadmill or push himself away from the buffet tables (or both), that gut ain't pretty. Overall I thought the graphics where an interesting update, seemed sparse, lighter, like the set. I thought it worked pretty well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I finally got to watch Countdown&#8217;s Monday show. Two suggestions Countdown producers: first, tone down the make-up on Olbermann, he looked really orange that night. Second, if Olbermann is going to do segments where he is standing (like on SNF) he needs to get on the treadmill or push himself away from the buffet tables (or both), that gut ain&#8217;t pretty. Overall I thought the graphics where an interesting update, seemed sparse, lighter, like the set. I thought it worked pretty well.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: moonbeam</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/10/23/mondays-numbers-76/#comment-56612</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2007 10:01:51 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/10/23/mondays-numbers-76/#comment-56612</guid>
					<description>Morning Joe can't get rid of those fleas!

Abrams' show is tanking too.  Poor MSNBC.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Morning Joe can&#8217;t get rid of those fleas!</p>
	<p>Abrams&#8217; show is tanking too.  Poor MSNBC.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Alison</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/10/23/mondays-numbers-76/#comment-56606</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2007 08:23:52 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/10/23/mondays-numbers-76/#comment-56606</guid>
					<description>Sanchez has not consistently beat Olbermann in the ratings but he's only been on for a few weeks in that time slot. It took Olbermann YEARS to get to number 2 in the ratings in that time slot. And for &quot;Gramps&quot;, Sanchez has beaten Olbermann in the ratings Before there were fires in SoCal. Let's see how long it takes for Olbermann to start attacking Sanchez on-air in-between his attacks on Bill O'Reilly. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Sanchez has not consistently beat Olbermann in the ratings but he&#8217;s only been on for a few weeks in that time slot. It took Olbermann YEARS to get to number 2 in the ratings in that time slot. And for &#8220;Gramps&#8221;, Sanchez has beaten Olbermann in the ratings Before there were fires in SoCal. Let&#8217;s see how long it takes for Olbermann to start attacking Sanchez on-air in-between his attacks on Bill O&#8217;Reilly.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: eddiebear</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/10/23/mondays-numbers-76/#comment-56590</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2007 00:51:32 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/10/23/mondays-numbers-76/#comment-56590</guid>
					<description>Gramps:
Always looking to defend KO, I see. If it was indeed the fires, then why isn't your hero out there on the front linew with the rest of the real reporters? Or, is he braver by sitting in a studio in NY and hurling the 1197th insult at BOR?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Gramps:<br />
Always looking to defend KO, I see. If it was indeed the fires, then why isn&#8217;t your hero out there on the front linew with the rest of the real reporters? Or, is he braver by sitting in a studio in NY and hurling the 1197th insult at BOR?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Gramps</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/10/23/mondays-numbers-76/#comment-56588</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2007 00:12:26 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/10/23/mondays-numbers-76/#comment-56588</guid>
					<description>Though Sanchez has done surprisingly well, Olbermann almost always beats him.  This is even better than usual for Sanchez.  It's the fires.  Paula Zahn would also do well when there were big stories.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Though Sanchez has done surprisingly well, Olbermann almost always beats him.  This is even better than usual for Sanchez.  It&#8217;s the fires.  Paula Zahn would also do well when there were big stories.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: foxmeansbusiness</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/10/23/mondays-numbers-76/#comment-56584</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2007 23:19:29 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/10/23/mondays-numbers-76/#comment-56584</guid>
					<description>You guys do know that Sanchez is a  real newsman, unlike KO who is just a lunatic mouthpiece of the DNC. This is why Rick is doing so good, I mean while Rick is out on the frontline of the CA fires KO is talking about Valery Plame, if KO were to go to the fires he would need a skirt to hide under.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>You guys do know that Sanchez is a  real newsman, unlike KO who is just a lunatic mouthpiece of the DNC. This is why Rick is doing so good, I mean while Rick is out on the frontline of the CA fires KO is talking about Valery Plame, if KO were to go to the fires he would need a skirt to hide under.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: myview</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/10/23/mondays-numbers-76/#comment-56580</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2007 22:39:26 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/10/23/mondays-numbers-76/#comment-56580</guid>
					<description>Every now and then Sanchez beats Olbermann. I'd have to go back and check but seems to me KO usually beats Sanchez.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Every now and then Sanchez beats Olbermann. I&#8217;d have to go back and check but seems to me KO usually beats Sanchez.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Missy</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/10/23/mondays-numbers-76/#comment-56575</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2007 22:19:32 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/10/23/mondays-numbers-76/#comment-56575</guid>
					<description>I haven't really been paying attention to the ratings of Rick Sanchez, but has he been beating Olbermann consistently?  If so, has the DBM been writing about his &quot;ratings surge&quot; and/or his &quot;lock&quot; second place?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I haven&#8217;t really been paying attention to the ratings of Rick Sanchez, but has he been beating Olbermann consistently?  If so, has the DBM been writing about his &#8220;ratings surge&#8221; and/or his &#8220;lock&#8221; second place?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Jim</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/10/23/mondays-numbers-76/#comment-56574</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2007 22:12:45 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/10/23/mondays-numbers-76/#comment-56574</guid>
					<description>???</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>???
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Steve</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/10/23/mondays-numbers-76/#comment-56573</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2007 22:08:42 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/10/23/mondays-numbers-76/#comment-56573</guid>
					<description>&lt;i&gt;KO plays to the lunatic fringe left, Fox plays to the right. Big difference.&lt;/i&gt;

Yeah if there's anything Fox is known for, it's a calm well reasoned advocacy of conservative values.  It's not like there's a slang word named after one of their hosts because a propensity to state the most outrageous things then add a question mark.

God I hope that was sarcastic enough.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p><i>KO plays to the lunatic fringe left, Fox plays to the right. Big difference.</i></p>
	<p>Yeah if there&#8217;s anything Fox is known for, it&#8217;s a calm well reasoned advocacy of conservative values.  It&#8217;s not like there&#8217;s a slang word named after one of their hosts because a propensity to state the most outrageous things then add a question mark.</p>
	<p>God I hope that was sarcastic enough.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Jim</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/10/23/mondays-numbers-76/#comment-56572</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2007 21:57:58 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/10/23/mondays-numbers-76/#comment-56572</guid>
					<description>The problem with Olbermann’s program is that it plays to a specific audience. There’s not much room for growth.

The same argument has been made both ways for Fox News, and it hasn’t seemed to hurt them.

KO plays to the lunatic fringe left, Fox plays to the right. Big difference.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>The problem with Olbermann’s program is that it plays to a specific audience. There’s not much room for growth.</p>
	<p>The same argument has been made both ways for Fox News, and it hasn’t seemed to hurt them.</p>
	<p>KO plays to the lunatic fringe left, Fox plays to the right. Big difference.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Goldfish</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/10/23/mondays-numbers-76/#comment-56566</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2007 21:39:49 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/10/23/mondays-numbers-76/#comment-56566</guid>
					<description>I meant OITO. Whoopsie.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I meant OITO. Whoopsie.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Goldfish</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/10/23/mondays-numbers-76/#comment-56565</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2007 21:38:42 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/10/23/mondays-numbers-76/#comment-56565</guid>
					<description>FishOil, I heard that CNN is moving Lou to 7 p.m. when Campbell's show debuts at 8. 

How about OTIO? Rick Sanchez is picking up ratings. What gives?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>FishOil, I heard that CNN is moving Lou to 7 p.m. when Campbell&#8217;s show debuts at 8. </p>
	<p>How about OTIO? Rick Sanchez is picking up ratings. What gives?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: clak</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/10/23/mondays-numbers-76/#comment-56564</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2007 21:36:54 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/10/23/mondays-numbers-76/#comment-56564</guid>
					<description>I will add myself to the list of people who would like to cnn continue to compete at 8pm(please make it interesting sanchez)

Also would like to see MR Beck have strong numbers against harball chriss...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I will add myself to the list of people who would like to cnn continue to compete at 8pm(please make it interesting sanchez)</p>
	<p>Also would like to see MR Beck have strong numbers against harball chriss&#8230;
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Steve</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/10/23/mondays-numbers-76/#comment-56563</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2007 21:28:56 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/10/23/mondays-numbers-76/#comment-56563</guid>
					<description>&lt;i&gt;The problem with Olbermann’s program is that it plays to a specific audience. There’s not much room for growth.
It should be interesting to see what becomes of his programming if a Democrat wins the Presidency and the Democrats gain more control in the Congress…he won’t have much to rail against except the Congressional minority.&lt;/i&gt;

The same argument has been made both ways for Fox News, and it hasn't seemed to hurt them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p><i>The problem with Olbermann’s program is that it plays to a specific audience. There’s not much room for growth.<br />
It should be interesting to see what becomes of his programming if a Democrat wins the Presidency and the Democrats gain more control in the Congress…he won’t have much to rail against except the Congressional minority.</i></p>
	<p>The same argument has been made both ways for Fox News, and it hasn&#8217;t seemed to hurt them.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Alison</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/10/23/mondays-numbers-76/#comment-56562</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2007 21:26:25 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/10/23/mondays-numbers-76/#comment-56562</guid>
					<description>Will Sanchez get a ratings bump when Lou is moved to 7pm? </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Will Sanchez get a ratings bump when Lou is moved to 7pm?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Jorge Gutierez</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/10/23/mondays-numbers-76/#comment-56560</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2007 21:18:42 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/10/23/mondays-numbers-76/#comment-56560</guid>
					<description>Eventhough Sanchez is posting some incredible numbers (never thought they'd be that high), what else can CNN do with Campbell?  She is already getting pid buku bucks.  Where are they going to stick her???  At 6 pm?  at 7 pm?  at 11 pm?  Not going to happen.  It's going to be interesting to see what happend if Rick's numbers keep growing once Brown is slated to start.  Could be fun.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Eventhough Sanchez is posting some incredible numbers (never thought they&#8217;d be that high), what else can CNN do with Campbell?  She is already getting pid buku bucks.  Where are they going to stick her???  At 6 pm?  at 7 pm?  at 11 pm?  Not going to happen.  It&#8217;s going to be interesting to see what happend if Rick&#8217;s numbers keep growing once Brown is slated to start.  Could be fun.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: FishOil</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/10/23/mondays-numbers-76/#comment-56559</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2007 21:10:58 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/10/23/mondays-numbers-76/#comment-56559</guid>
					<description>#1 - Yeah, I've been wondering what CNN will do if Sanchez is able to maintain second place...mabye break the 1 mil mark in total viewership. 

The problem with Olbermann's program is that it plays to a specific audience. There's not much room for growth. 
It should be interesting to see what becomes of his programming if a Democrat wins the Presidency and the Democrats gain more control in the Congress...he won't have much to rail against except the Congressional minority.

Lou Dobbs is getting very compeditive at the 6pm slot. Perhaps CNN will re-think moving him to 7pm??

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>#1 - Yeah, I&#8217;ve been wondering what CNN will do if Sanchez is able to maintain second place&#8230;mabye break the 1 mil mark in total viewership. </p>
	<p>The problem with Olbermann&#8217;s program is that it plays to a specific audience. There&#8217;s not much room for growth.<br />
It should be interesting to see what becomes of his programming if a Democrat wins the Presidency and the Democrats gain more control in the Congress&#8230;he won&#8217;t have much to rail against except the Congressional minority.</p>
	<p>Lou Dobbs is getting very compeditive at the 6pm slot. Perhaps CNN will re-think moving him to 7pm??
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: foxmeansbusiness</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/10/23/mondays-numbers-76/#comment-56556</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2007 21:03:51 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/10/23/mondays-numbers-76/#comment-56556</guid>
					<description>I just watched the Rush interview again and that lunatic Olberman must really be steamed...LOL

I dont watch kookey Keith, was his face redder than normal tonight?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I just watched the Rush interview again and that lunatic Olberman must really be steamed&#8230;LOL</p>
	<p>I dont watch kookey Keith, was his face redder than normal tonight?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: foxmeansbusiness</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/10/23/mondays-numbers-76/#comment-56553</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2007 20:44:07 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/10/23/mondays-numbers-76/#comment-56553</guid>
					<description>I dont know if this is allowed but you can see and hear the interview at rushlimbaugh.com/home/today.guest.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I dont know if this is allowed but you can see and hear the interview at rushlimbaugh.com/home/today.guest.html
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: foxmeansbusiness</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/10/23/mondays-numbers-76/#comment-56552</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2007 20:28:45 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/10/23/mondays-numbers-76/#comment-56552</guid>
					<description>Joe had Rush on via telephone today for 15 min or so, if they would have let people know ahead of time his ratings would have at least doubled.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Joe had Rush on via telephone today for 15 min or so, if they would have let people know ahead of time his ratings would have at least doubled.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Tom P</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/10/23/mondays-numbers-76/#comment-56537</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2007 19:27:27 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/10/23/mondays-numbers-76/#comment-56537</guid>
					<description>Well well Bathtub-boy.  May we assume that we will NOT be hearing anything about the ratings anytime soon?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Well well Bathtub-boy.  May we assume that we will NOT be hearing anything about the ratings anytime soon?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/10/23/mondays-numbers-76/#comment-56533</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2007 19:04:56 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/10/23/mondays-numbers-76/#comment-56533</guid>
					<description>Morning Joe – 224,000 viewers (a scratch with 44,000)

Oh yeah, and whoever said the new studio wouldn't help was right. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Morning Joe – 224,000 viewers (a scratch with 44,000)</p>
	<p>Oh yeah, and whoever said the new studio wouldn&#8217;t help was right.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/10/23/mondays-numbers-76/#comment-56532</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2007 19:02:59 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/10/23/mondays-numbers-76/#comment-56532</guid>
					<description>Out in the Open – 771,000 viewers (309,000) LSD: 782,000 viewers (317,000)

Wow!  Go get 'em Rick!! The highest demo for CNN last night.  If things keep going the way they have, Campbell's show is gonna be in a LOT of trouble.....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Out in the Open – 771,000 viewers (309,000) LSD: 782,000 viewers (317,000)</p>
	<p>Wow!  Go get &#8216;em Rick!! The highest demo for CNN last night.  If things keep going the way they have, Campbell&#8217;s show is gonna be in a LOT of trouble&#8230;..
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
