<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/1.5.1-alpha" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Wednesday&#8217;s Numbers&#8230;</title>
	<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/11/01/wednesdays-numbers-78/</link>
	<description>Unvarnished news &#038; opinion on cable news</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 17:53:34 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=1.5.1-alpha</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Do not trust the liberal media</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/11/01/wednesdays-numbers-78/#comment-57784</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 10:00:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/11/01/wednesdays-numbers-78/#comment-57784</guid>
					<description>Olberwomann is a bottom feeder.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Olberwomann is a bottom feeder.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Aaron</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/11/01/wednesdays-numbers-78/#comment-57781</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 03:16:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/11/01/wednesdays-numbers-78/#comment-57781</guid>
					<description>Tucker hit 300,000 and he wasn't even hosting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Tucker hit 300,000 and he wasn&#8217;t even hosting.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Nick</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/11/01/wednesdays-numbers-78/#comment-57778</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 01:49:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/11/01/wednesdays-numbers-78/#comment-57778</guid>
					<description>wow oreilley almost hit 3 million.....H&amp;amp;C hit 2 million...and there weren't even any major specials goin on!! very impressive</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>wow oreilley almost hit 3 million&#8230;..H&amp;C hit 2 million&#8230;and there weren&#8217;t even any major specials goin on!! very impressive
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Nick D.</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/11/01/wednesdays-numbers-78/#comment-57775</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 00:46:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/11/01/wednesdays-numbers-78/#comment-57775</guid>
					<description>TommyBoy71....I was with you right up to calling Abrams a &quot;pretty boy&quot;...reminds me of a defective wind-up toy I stepped on when I was 3...

Rick Sanchez catching up to K.O.just cracks me up...and he gets it without a mindless stream of left-wing smear group Bush-hating blather....

The reason why &quot;Countdown&quot; gets so many TiVo numbers? When it just gets too mindnumbingly stupid, zip goes the FF.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>TommyBoy71&#8230;.I was with you right up to calling Abrams a &#8220;pretty boy&#8221;&#8230;reminds me of a defective wind-up toy I stepped on when I was 3&#8230;</p>
	<p>Rick Sanchez catching up to K.O.just cracks me up&#8230;and he gets it without a mindless stream of left-wing smear group Bush-hating blather&#8230;.</p>
	<p>The reason why &#8220;Countdown&#8221; gets so many TiVo numbers? When it just gets too mindnumbingly stupid, zip goes the FF.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: ImNotBlue</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/11/01/wednesdays-numbers-78/#comment-57772</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 00:21:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/11/01/wednesdays-numbers-78/#comment-57772</guid>
					<description>Hey Evan... what are you talking about?  Bringing his numbers down?

Let's see KO's live numbers beat O'Reilly's re-run numbers... then maybe we'll talk!  Yeppee!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Hey Evan&#8230; what are you talking about?  Bringing his numbers down?</p>
	<p>Let&#8217;s see KO&#8217;s live numbers beat O&#8217;Reilly&#8217;s re-run numbers&#8230; then maybe we&#8217;ll talk!  Yeppee!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Evan, Nashville, TN</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/11/01/wednesdays-numbers-78/#comment-57771</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 00:17:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/11/01/wednesdays-numbers-78/#comment-57771</guid>
					<description>Go, Keith. Keep bringing Billos' numbers down. Billo and Fux News are continuing to go down in ratings. Yeppee.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Go, Keith. Keep bringing Billos&#8217; numbers down. Billo and Fux News are continuing to go down in ratings. Yeppee.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: tommyboy71</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/11/01/wednesdays-numbers-78/#comment-57769</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2007 23:45:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/11/01/wednesdays-numbers-78/#comment-57769</guid>
					<description>My local public access channels offering council meeting reruns must get higher ratings than Dan Abrams. Know why? Because nobody in America gives two hoots about the babble-filled rantings of yet another one of MSNBC self-indulged narcissistic pretty boy who pass themselves as &quot;journalists&quot; and live for nothing more than their obsence paychecks and to hear the sounds of their own left wing voices. 

What a waste.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>My local public access channels offering council meeting reruns must get higher ratings than Dan Abrams. Know why? Because nobody in America gives two hoots about the babble-filled rantings of yet another one of MSNBC self-indulged narcissistic pretty boy who pass themselves as &#8220;journalists&#8221; and live for nothing more than their obsence paychecks and to hear the sounds of their own left wing voices. </p>
	<p>What a waste.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: mlong</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/11/01/wednesdays-numbers-78/#comment-57756</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2007 22:24:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/11/01/wednesdays-numbers-78/#comment-57756</guid>
					<description>How long before KO starts launching attacks on Sanchez and names him WPITW or digs up allegations from 4 years ago in an pathetic attempt to derail him like he did with O'Reilly?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>How long before KO starts launching attacks on Sanchez and names him WPITW or digs up allegations from 4 years ago in an pathetic attempt to derail him like he did with O&#8217;Reilly?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: RGL</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/11/01/wednesdays-numbers-78/#comment-57755</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2007 22:21:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/11/01/wednesdays-numbers-78/#comment-57755</guid>
					<description>Wow! Look at O'Reilly's numbers, almost 3 million. That must be his highest rating, plus a repeat of his program at 11 pm, which would give him about four million. Forget about Blabberman - he is stuck at the bottom. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Wow! Look at O&#8217;Reilly&#8217;s numbers, almost 3 million. That must be his highest rating, plus a repeat of his program at 11 pm, which would give him about four million. Forget about Blabberman - he is stuck at the bottom.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: jmkaib</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/11/01/wednesdays-numbers-78/#comment-57740</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2007 20:58:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/11/01/wednesdays-numbers-78/#comment-57740</guid>
					<description>Maybe Campbell Brown will not get her show after all...  Sanchez is doing a good job for CNN.  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Maybe Campbell Brown will not get her show after all&#8230;  Sanchez is doing a good job for CNN.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: eddiebear</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/11/01/wednesdays-numbers-78/#comment-57736</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2007 20:48:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/11/01/wednesdays-numbers-78/#comment-57736</guid>
					<description>#4:
I wonder if the MSM will start their series of fawning stories about Sanchez like they have of Olbermann</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>#4:<br />
I wonder if the MSM will start their series of fawning stories about Sanchez like they have of Olbermann
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: StephenMartin</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/11/01/wednesdays-numbers-78/#comment-57732</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2007 20:37:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/11/01/wednesdays-numbers-78/#comment-57732</guid>
					<description>BOR hit 4M last night. Sanchez has been on for a few months and he's nearly got the following Keithie does. LOL.  This has got to make Keithie boy furious. lol Life is good.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>BOR hit 4M last night. Sanchez has been on for a few months and he&#8217;s nearly got the following Keithie does. LOL.  This has got to make Keithie boy furious. lol Life is good.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: foxmeansbusiness</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/11/01/wednesdays-numbers-78/#comment-57731</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2007 20:35:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/11/01/wednesdays-numbers-78/#comment-57731</guid>
					<description>Hannity beat all others at 9 combined.

Also Oreilly creamed Dolbermann again, as usuall KO numbers suck, and so does he.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Hannity beat all others at 9 combined.</p>
	<p>Also Oreilly creamed Dolbermann again, as usuall KO numbers suck, and so does he.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Grandpa D</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/11/01/wednesdays-numbers-78/#comment-57727</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2007 20:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/11/01/wednesdays-numbers-78/#comment-57727</guid>
					<description>Shepard Smith's Fox Report did better than Brit Hume!  Isn't that unusual?  (I have a short memory.)
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Shepard Smith&#8217;s Fox Report did better than Brit Hume!  Isn&#8217;t that unusual?  (I have a short memory.)
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/11/01/wednesdays-numbers-78/#comment-57724</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2007 19:36:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/11/01/wednesdays-numbers-78/#comment-57724</guid>
					<description>Sanchez is giving KO a run for his money again...good to see someone give him some competition.  

And I was curious why CNN ran that &quot;Gods Warriors&quot; doc again last night....that was so random!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Sanchez is giving KO a run for his money again&#8230;good to see someone give him some competition.  </p>
	<p>And I was curious why CNN ran that &#8220;Gods Warriors&#8221; doc again last night&#8230;.that was so random!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
