<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/1.5.1-alpha" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Thursday&#8217;s Numbers&#8230;</title>
	<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/11/02/thursdays-numbers-62/</link>
	<description>Unvarnished news &#038; opinion on cable news</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 08:40:43 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=1.5.1-alpha</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Brad Strecker</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/11/02/thursdays-numbers-62/#comment-58139</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2007 18:08:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/11/02/thursdays-numbers-62/#comment-58139</guid>
					<description>Imus ratings are only good if you compare them to Morning Joe. Imus at his best got about 1/3 of the ratings Fox &amp;amp; Friends gets. Get real</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Imus ratings are only good if you compare them to Morning Joe. Imus at his best got about 1/3 of the ratings Fox &amp; Friends gets. Get real
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Gramps</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/11/02/thursdays-numbers-62/#comment-58118</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2007 16:30:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/11/02/thursdays-numbers-62/#comment-58118</guid>
					<description>&lt;i&gt;When does MSNBC give up on Olbermann?&lt;/i&gt;

They'd be idiots to pull the plug.  He's their highest rated show, and his ratings are improving faster than any of their other shows.  So, if the msnbc bosses are rational, he's way down on their list of potential cuts.  In fact, they should probably give him another big raise.  He usually beats most of the CNN shows -- in last month's cumulative ratings, for instance (better to go by whole months to avoid day-to-day fluctuations), he beat all the CNN shows except Larry King and Lou Dobbs -- and that was on the overall ratings.  In the demo (which the all the networks pay a lot of attention to), he beat Dobbs.  He's also beating some of the FNC shows in the demo, for instance, for all last month, he beat Cavuto and Gibson pretty soundly in the demo, and came very close to Hume.  So, if you think Olbermann's the guy (of all the great options they have to cut!) that msnbc should cut, well, then, as Krugman has taught us to say, I have some great yellow cake from Niger I'd like to sell ya.  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p><i>When does MSNBC give up on Olbermann?</i></p>
	<p>They&#8217;d be idiots to pull the plug.  He&#8217;s their highest rated show, and his ratings are improving faster than any of their other shows.  So, if the msnbc bosses are rational, he&#8217;s way down on their list of potential cuts.  In fact, they should probably give him another big raise.  He usually beats most of the CNN shows &#8212; in last month&#8217;s cumulative ratings, for instance (better to go by whole months to avoid day-to-day fluctuations), he beat all the CNN shows except Larry King and Lou Dobbs &#8212; and that was on the overall ratings.  In the demo (which the all the networks pay a lot of attention to), he beat Dobbs.  He&#8217;s also beating some of the FNC shows in the demo, for instance, for all last month, he beat Cavuto and Gibson pretty soundly in the demo, and came very close to Hume.  So, if you think Olbermann&#8217;s the guy (of all the great options they have to cut!) that msnbc should cut, well, then, as Krugman has taught us to say, I have some great yellow cake from Niger I&#8217;d like to sell ya.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: jane</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/11/02/thursdays-numbers-62/#comment-58082</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2007 09:29:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/11/02/thursdays-numbers-62/#comment-58082</guid>
					<description>When does MSNBC give up on Olbermann?  

Even the hard core looney lefties are tired of his constant complaining and Bush Derangement Syndrome.  You can only listen to the whining, moaning, blaming, and bitching so long before even the hard core get sick of it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>When does MSNBC give up on Olbermann?  </p>
	<p>Even the hard core looney lefties are tired of his constant complaining and Bush Derangement Syndrome.  You can only listen to the whining, moaning, blaming, and bitching so long before even the hard core get sick of it.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Aaron</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/11/02/thursdays-numbers-62/#comment-57969</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Nov 2007 15:26:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/11/02/thursdays-numbers-62/#comment-57969</guid>
					<description>John Kasich just isn't fit to host a weekday prime time program. I totally agree with you Missy &amp;amp; Cella.  I actually want to see an interesting host.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>John Kasich just isn&#8217;t fit to host a weekday prime time program. I totally agree with you Missy &amp; Cella.  I actually want to see an interesting host.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Bob</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/11/02/thursdays-numbers-62/#comment-57948</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Nov 2007 11:44:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/11/02/thursdays-numbers-62/#comment-57948</guid>
					<description>BOR keeps getting bigger in the ratings. His numbers 
are terrific. Poor KO keeps on sucking. And MSNBC celebrates his improvement. What losers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>BOR keeps getting bigger in the ratings. His numbers<br />
are terrific. Poor KO keeps on sucking. And MSNBC celebrates his improvement. What losers.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Cella</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/11/02/thursdays-numbers-62/#comment-57947</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Nov 2007 11:42:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/11/02/thursdays-numbers-62/#comment-57947</guid>
					<description>Missy,
Ditto!
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Missy,<br />
Ditto!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: myview</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/11/02/thursdays-numbers-62/#comment-57942</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Nov 2007 10:20:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/11/02/thursdays-numbers-62/#comment-57942</guid>
					<description>Decent numbers for SIU.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Decent numbers for SIU.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Nick D.</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/11/02/thursdays-numbers-62/#comment-57939</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Nov 2007 08:52:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/11/02/thursdays-numbers-62/#comment-57939</guid>
					<description>Imus would bring ratings...and MSNBC doesn't get those....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Imus would bring ratings&#8230;and MSNBC doesn&#8217;t get those&#8230;.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: FishOil</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/11/02/thursdays-numbers-62/#comment-57932</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Nov 2007 00:47:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/11/02/thursdays-numbers-62/#comment-57932</guid>
					<description>#2 - I highly doubt Imus would go back to MSNBC. Olbermann trashed him as a racist after he was fired from MSNBC and Abrams justified the firing, so MSNBC burned the bridge. 
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>#2 - I highly doubt Imus would go back to MSNBC. Olbermann trashed him as a racist after he was fired from MSNBC and Abrams justified the firing, so MSNBC burned the bridge.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: StephenMartin</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/11/02/thursdays-numbers-62/#comment-57925</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 23:47:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/11/02/thursdays-numbers-62/#comment-57925</guid>
					<description>BOR- 4, Kiethie Slobermann- 1   Was that the sound of a toilet flushing?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>BOR- 4, Kiethie Slobermann- 1   Was that the sound of a toilet flushing?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Missy</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/11/02/thursdays-numbers-62/#comment-57921</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 23:14:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/11/02/thursdays-numbers-62/#comment-57921</guid>
					<description>After all the write-ups about Laura Ingraham being the permanent guest host of The Factor, I turn on a few minutes ago to see either her or O'Reilly.  Isn't that what we've been led to believe?

So why on earth is John Kasich sitting there tonight?  What does &quot;permanent guest host&quot; mean if not that she's supposed to be there whenever O'Reilly is not?  Nothing against Kasich (and I loved his Saturday program), but he's not as entertaining as Laura and Bill.  But more importantly, why did Fox bother to announce Laura in such a manner if in fact she is NOT the only Factor substitue that will be used?  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>After all the write-ups about Laura Ingraham being the permanent guest host of The Factor, I turn on a few minutes ago to see either her or O&#8217;Reilly.  Isn&#8217;t that what we&#8217;ve been led to believe?</p>
	<p>So why on earth is John Kasich sitting there tonight?  What does &#8220;permanent guest host&#8221; mean if not that she&#8217;s supposed to be there whenever O&#8217;Reilly is not?  Nothing against Kasich (and I loved his Saturday program), but he&#8217;s not as entertaining as Laura and Bill.  But more importantly, why did Fox bother to announce Laura in such a manner if in fact she is NOT the only Factor substitue that will be used?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: foxmeansbusiness</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/11/02/thursdays-numbers-62/#comment-57915</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 22:25:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/11/02/thursdays-numbers-62/#comment-57915</guid>
					<description>FOX and oreilly had huge numbers, while Dolbermanns #'s suck and so does he.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>FOX and oreilly had huge numbers, while Dolbermanns #&#8217;s suck and so does he.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: JAB</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/11/02/thursdays-numbers-62/#comment-57911</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 21:58:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/11/02/thursdays-numbers-62/#comment-57911</guid>
					<description>Imus is back and his legions of fans are thrilled. 
MSNBC could do the right thing and put him back where he belongs.
Ratings would soar and sponsors would benefit.


..........................................................................</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Imus is back and his legions of fans are thrilled.<br />
MSNBC could do the right thing and put him back where he belongs.<br />
Ratings would soar and sponsors would benefit.</p>
	<p>&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;..
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: FishOil</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/11/02/thursdays-numbers-62/#comment-57902</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 21:40:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/11/02/thursdays-numbers-62/#comment-57902</guid>
					<description>Strong night for Hannity and Colmes....not to mention Fox overall.

I know they just moved to the new studio and it takes time to build an audience, but Morning Joe doesn't seem to be catching on at all. I would assume MSNBC will have a decision to make if the ratings don't change by early next year. Imus is probably having a good laugh over getting dumped and watching what is happening now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Strong night for Hannity and Colmes&#8230;.not to mention Fox overall.</p>
	<p>I know they just moved to the new studio and it takes time to build an audience, but Morning Joe doesn&#8217;t seem to be catching on at all. I would assume MSNBC will have a decision to make if the ratings don&#8217;t change by early next year. Imus is probably having a good laugh over getting dumped and watching what is happening now.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
