<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/1.5.1-alpha" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Tuesday&#8217;s Numbers&#8230;</title>
	<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/11/07/tuesdays-numbers-62/</link>
	<description>Unvarnished news &#038; opinion on cable news</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 09:36:23 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=1.5.1-alpha</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Aaron</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/11/07/tuesdays-numbers-62/#comment-59946</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Nov 2007 13:24:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/11/07/tuesdays-numbers-62/#comment-59946</guid>
					<description>someone put these numbers on wikipedia</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>someone put these numbers on wikipedia
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Jim</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/11/07/tuesdays-numbers-62/#comment-58528</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2007 01:20:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/11/07/tuesdays-numbers-62/#comment-58528</guid>
					<description>I can now see why Olby has started whining about Brit Hume. Are LSD numbers available for afternoon programming or just the prime time broadcasts?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I can now see why Olby has started whining about Brit Hume. Are LSD numbers available for afternoon programming or just the prime time broadcasts?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: foxmeansbusiness</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/11/07/tuesdays-numbers-62/#comment-58527</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2007 00:24:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/11/07/tuesdays-numbers-62/#comment-58527</guid>
					<description>FLASH Rosie show a NO GO

http://www.rosie.com/blog/2007/11/07/the-show-that-never-was/ 
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>FLASH Rosie show a NO GO</p>
	<p><a >http://www.rosie.com/blog/2007/11/07/the-show-that-never-was/</a>
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: RGL</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/11/07/tuesdays-numbers-62/#comment-58512</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2007 22:09:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/11/07/tuesdays-numbers-62/#comment-58512</guid>
					<description>Fish oil, I think you are dreaming. I like Lou Dobbs, too, but his numbers go up and down like a yo-yo. Just resign yourself to the fact that he will always be No. 2. Which is not bad, come to think about it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Fish oil, I think you are dreaming. I like Lou Dobbs, too, but his numbers go up and down like a yo-yo. Just resign yourself to the fact that he will always be No. 2. Which is not bad, come to think about it.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/11/07/tuesdays-numbers-62/#comment-58506</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2007 20:42:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/11/07/tuesdays-numbers-62/#comment-58506</guid>
					<description>Rick and Out in the Open would do better, but the show can't build a base when they keep running specials and other shows periodically at that time. With some stability and Dobbs at 7pm, I think it will do just fine.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Rick and Out in the Open would do better, but the show can&#8217;t build a base when they keep running specials and other shows periodically at that time. With some stability and Dobbs at 7pm, I think it will do just fine.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: FishOil</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/11/07/tuesdays-numbers-62/#comment-58505</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2007 19:45:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/11/07/tuesdays-numbers-62/#comment-58505</guid>
					<description>#4 - Yeah, I think Dobbs has a chance to catch Shepard Smith. 

And O'Reilly pulled massive demo #'s...impressive.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>#4 - Yeah, I think Dobbs has a chance to catch Shepard Smith. </p>
	<p>And O&#8217;Reilly pulled massive demo #&#8217;s&#8230;impressive.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: FishOil</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/11/07/tuesdays-numbers-62/#comment-58504</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2007 19:44:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/11/07/tuesdays-numbers-62/#comment-58504</guid>
					<description>#2 - Yeah, Tucker's numbers pretty bad.

What's worse for MSNBC is that they have Tucker in their sights, but yesterday he matched Morning Joe in the demo and beat him in total viewers by a hair. Morning Joe is really hurting in the ratings. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>#2 - Yeah, Tucker&#8217;s numbers pretty bad.</p>
	<p>What&#8217;s worse for MSNBC is that they have Tucker in their sights, but yesterday he matched Morning Joe in the demo and beat him in total viewers by a hair. Morning Joe is really hurting in the ratings.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: myview</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/11/07/tuesdays-numbers-62/#comment-58503</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2007 19:37:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/11/07/tuesdays-numbers-62/#comment-58503</guid>
					<description>Impressive numbers for Lou Dobbs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Impressive numbers for Lou Dobbs.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: clak</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/11/07/tuesdays-numbers-62/#comment-58499</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2007 19:17:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/11/07/tuesdays-numbers-62/#comment-58499</guid>
					<description>872,000 viewers olbbyy followed with abrams 424,000 viewers...

In my opinion all of olbermans viewers are a one program group of people, they probably tune in to watch his show and then are done with there prime time cable news or do they run back to there bloggs for the rest of the evening??  
Does he get all the die hard sports fans to watch his show??  

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>872,000 viewers olbbyy followed with abrams 424,000 viewers&#8230;</p>
	<p>In my opinion all of olbermans viewers are a one program group of people, they probably tune in to watch his show and then are done with there prime time cable news or do they run back to there bloggs for the rest of the evening??<br />
Does he get all the die hard sports fans to watch his show??
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/11/07/tuesdays-numbers-62/#comment-58497</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2007 19:03:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/11/07/tuesdays-numbers-62/#comment-58497</guid>
					<description>TUCKER DEATH WATCH:  Fifth overall, fourth in the demo. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>TUCKER DEATH WATCH:  Fifth overall, fourth in the demo.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/11/07/tuesdays-numbers-62/#comment-58495</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2007 18:50:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/11/07/tuesdays-numbers-62/#comment-58495</guid>
					<description>Lou did pretty well again last night in his new home, and Olbermann had a nice night as well.  It's too bad that Rick isn't able to hold on to more of his lead-in though. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Lou did pretty well again last night in his new home, and Olbermann had a nice night as well.  It&#8217;s too bad that Rick isn&#8217;t able to hold on to more of his lead-in though.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
