<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/1.5.1-alpha" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What&#8217;s hot/What&#8217;s not: 11/18/07</title>
	<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/11/18/whats-hotwhats-not-111807/</link>
	<description>Unvarnished news &#038; opinion on cable news</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 09:32:50 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=1.5.1-alpha</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Ree</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/11/18/whats-hotwhats-not-111807/#comment-59703</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2007 10:08:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/11/18/whats-hotwhats-not-111807/#comment-59703</guid>
					<description>Spud,

There is already a youtube video about the question asked John McCain about how do we beat...Shes back.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uznxDoJ3S4o</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Spud,</p>
	<p>There is already a youtube video about the question asked John McCain about how do we beat&#8230;Shes back.<br />
<a >http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uznxDoJ3S4o</a>
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: elmonica</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/11/18/whats-hotwhats-not-111807/#comment-59638</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 16:20:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/11/18/whats-hotwhats-not-111807/#comment-59638</guid>
					<description>The next time the Norman Lear center does a poll, they ought to ask the question how many Fox Viewers simultaneously listen to talk radio while watching Fox News. I bet it is high number.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>The next time the Norman Lear center does a poll, they ought to ask the question how many Fox Viewers simultaneously listen to talk radio while watching Fox News. I bet it is high number.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: foxmeansbusiness</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/11/18/whats-hotwhats-not-111807/#comment-59615</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 14:13:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/11/18/whats-hotwhats-not-111807/#comment-59615</guid>
					<description>Fox news and rush Limbaugh simulcast at 1PM today

http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/home/today.guest.html 
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Fox news and rush Limbaugh simulcast at 1PM today</p>
	<p><a >http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/home/today.guest.html</a>
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Alison</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/11/18/whats-hotwhats-not-111807/#comment-59600</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 11:56:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/11/18/whats-hotwhats-not-111807/#comment-59600</guid>
					<description>I'd have to add the late-breaking news about Shep Smith's new deal to the &quot;HOT&quot; category. 7-8M a year? That's impressive by anyone's standards. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I&#8217;d have to add the late-breaking news about Shep Smith&#8217;s new deal to the &#8220;HOT&#8221; category. 7-8M a year? That&#8217;s impressive by anyone&#8217;s standards.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Cella</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/11/18/whats-hotwhats-not-111807/#comment-59591</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 10:58:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/11/18/whats-hotwhats-not-111807/#comment-59591</guid>
					<description>One of the big stories to emerge all over the MSM regarding CNN's coverage of the debate is the fact that they stacked the deck, and went in the tank for Hillary.
It was a bigger story than the actual coverage.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>One of the big stories to emerge all over the MSM regarding CNN&#8217;s coverage of the debate is the fact that they stacked the deck, and went in the tank for Hillary.<br />
It was a bigger story than the actual coverage.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: randy</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/11/18/whats-hotwhats-not-111807/#comment-59571</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 03:50:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/11/18/whats-hotwhats-not-111807/#comment-59571</guid>
					<description>C'mon Spud, everybody voted CNN as hot for the ratings, and not for the way they handled the debate.  Not to mention, its not even just us, a lot of people around the blogosphere and in the news have commented on this.  God even CNN's president said he felt uncomfortable with the whole Carville post debate.  So Spud, why dont they deserve a not hot as well?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>C&#8217;mon Spud, everybody voted CNN as hot for the ratings, and not for the way they handled the debate.  Not to mention, its not even just us, a lot of people around the blogosphere and in the news have commented on this.  God even CNN&#8217;s president said he felt uncomfortable with the whole Carville post debate.  So Spud, why dont they deserve a not hot as well?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Caufield</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/11/18/whats-hotwhats-not-111807/#comment-59567</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 02:18:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/11/18/whats-hotwhats-not-111807/#comment-59567</guid>
					<description>I agree that some perspective is needed in this Reagan lawsuit.  The ties to FNC seem tenuous at best, and at least according to Roger Parloff over at CNNMoney, the whole suit &quot;reads like one of those humor pieces in The New Yorker, where it not-so-gradually dawns on the reader that the narrator is out of his gourd. Even though you’re hearing only one side of the story, that’s enough to make up your mind against the griper.&quot;

http://legalpad.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/2007/11/15/judith-regans-bizarre-complaint-against-news-corp/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I agree that some perspective is needed in this Reagan lawsuit.  The ties to FNC seem tenuous at best, and at least according to Roger Parloff over at CNNMoney, the whole suit &#8220;reads like one of those humor pieces in The New Yorker, where it not-so-gradually dawns on the reader that the narrator is out of his gourd. Even though you’re hearing only one side of the story, that’s enough to make up your mind against the griper.&#8221;</p>
	<p><a >http://legalpad.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/2007/11/15/judith-regans-bizarre-complaint-against-news-corp/</a>
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: CandyCorn</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/11/18/whats-hotwhats-not-111807/#comment-59550</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 00:17:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/11/18/whats-hotwhats-not-111807/#comment-59550</guid>
					<description>Sweet Jesus, I'm taking Spud out for lunch, pick the spot, he's done gone crazy for CNN after his (must have been delicious) meal with Sanchez.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Sweet Jesus, I&#8217;m taking Spud out for lunch, pick the spot, he&#8217;s done gone crazy for CNN after his (must have been delicious) meal with Sanchez.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
