Inside Cable News

November 29, 2007

CNN scores in Republican debate…

CNN is very pleased with the ratings results from last night’s Republican YouTube debate…

Last night’s CNN YOUTUBE Republican Primary Debate was yet another record-breaker with more than 4.4 Million viewers tuning into CNN. These deliveries exceed ALL other primary debates in Cable News History IN ALL DEMOS!

(8-10:11p)
P2+ - 4,486k
P18-34 - 516k
P18-49 - 1,300k
P25-54 - 1,540k
P55+ - 2,668k

Nearly 5 Million viewers tuned in on both CNN and Headline News (simulcast) for last night’s Republican Primary Debate (4,900k).

CNN’s Democratic Primary Debate at UNLV on November 15 is the second highest-rated debate in history with 4 Million total viewers.

Here is the primary debate ranker for this election season so far…

Filed under: Cable News, CNN - Spud

7 Comments »

TrackBack: http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/11/29/cnn-scores-in-republican-debate/trackback/

  1. Well, despite the controversies around this debate, those are outstanding numbers! The debate was actually quite “entertaining” to watch and the 2 hours flew by.

    Comment by Anonymous — November 29, 2007 @ 5:22 pm

  2. I only watched the first hour and was on HLN.

    Comment by Terance — November 29, 2007 @ 5:43 pm

  3. And the five “plants” exceed ALL other primary debate plants in Cable News History as well!

    Comment by Missy — November 29, 2007 @ 6:00 pm

  4. Terance you saw the “Redacted” version of the debates.

    Comment by SHANE — November 29, 2007 @ 10:18 pm

  5. Yes, we have those numbers because it featured the GOP candidates, one of whom will be our next president. It’ as easy as that. The Dems will never top that.

    Comment by RGL — November 30, 2007 @ 12:44 am

  6. SHANE, are you an imbecile or do ya just like playing one on here? I watched the simulcast which was live you jackass. Now, tell me wtf was “redacted” about that?

    Comment by Terance — November 30, 2007 @ 7:28 am

  7. Shane, the “redacted” version, I assume the one without the General’s question, would probably have been 10 minutes shorter, not one whole hour shorter. Did you even watch the YouTube debate at all Shane, or are you just yelling like normal?

    Either way, it was an interesting debate since it had a few light moments, but also some where everyone was chewing off the next guys head, interesting and not a defacto-style debate.

    Comment by Chris (clind) — November 30, 2007 @ 8:25 pm

RSS feed for comments on this post.

Leave a comment



Anti-spam measure: please retype the above text into the box provided.

Get free blog up and running in minutes with Blogsome | Theme designs available here