<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/1.5.1-alpha" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Another Kerr article&#8230;</title>
	<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/11/30/another-kerr-article/</link>
	<description>Unvarnished news &#038; opinion on cable news</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 09:05:59 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=1.5.1-alpha</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: STP</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/11/30/another-kerr-article/#comment-60691</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Dec 2007 13:20:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/11/30/another-kerr-article/#comment-60691</guid>
					<description>ImNotBLlue: &quot;“However, this particular question was leading (”Why do you feel they’re not responsible enough…” is very similar to “When did you stop beating your wife?” No?)”

tinatracy: &quot;yes, just like the demo yuoutube debate question that asked if they would raise taxes “like all democrats do”

I agree with both of you. Both of these were questions which were leading. But all the candidates had to do was say that they disagree with how the question was framed, point out why they think the leading part of the question is inaccurate and answer the main jest of the question honestly. Should be an easy task for someone looking to have the voting public to make him or her our next President. 

I was also expecting the questions to be from average American voters but I don't think it's too much to ask that the candidates from all parties be willing to answer any question directed to them...whether from an actual average American, a non-average Democratic general like Kerr or a non-average Republican insider like Grover Nordquist. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>ImNotBLlue: &#8220;“However, this particular question was leading (”Why do you feel they’re not responsible enough…” is very similar to “When did you stop beating your wife?” No?)”</p>
	<p>tinatracy: &#8220;yes, just like the demo yuoutube debate question that asked if they would raise taxes “like all democrats do”</p>
	<p>I agree with both of you. Both of these were questions which were leading. But all the candidates had to do was say that they disagree with how the question was framed, point out why they think the leading part of the question is inaccurate and answer the main jest of the question honestly. Should be an easy task for someone looking to have the voting public to make him or her our next President. </p>
	<p>I was also expecting the questions to be from average American voters but I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s too much to ask that the candidates from all parties be willing to answer any question directed to them&#8230;whether from an actual average American, a non-average Democratic general like Kerr or a non-average Republican insider like Grover Nordquist.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: ImNotBlue</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/11/30/another-kerr-article/#comment-60618</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2007 22:10:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/11/30/another-kerr-article/#comment-60618</guid>
					<description>When I think &quot;Average,&quot; I think your typical middle class family, 2.4 kids, etc... you know, whatever the census says is the &quot;Average.&quot;

A retired General is not average.  How many Generals are there out there?  And how many of them, have then worked for a political campaign?  Puts him in the &quot;not-that-average&quot; group, at least for me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>When I think &#8220;Average,&#8221; I think your typical middle class family, 2.4 kids, etc&#8230; you know, whatever the census says is the &#8220;Average.&#8221;</p>
	<p>A retired General is not average.  How many Generals are there out there?  And how many of them, have then worked for a political campaign?  Puts him in the &#8220;not-that-average&#8221; group, at least for me.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: bigred</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/11/30/another-kerr-article/#comment-60589</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2007 18:00:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/11/30/another-kerr-article/#comment-60589</guid>
					<description>Oh please, Judy.  You know that if the situation were reversed and it was a Democrat debate... or a FOX News debate, you would be praising the employee who outed the plant.

Your hypocrisy knows no bounds.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Oh please, Judy.  You know that if the situation were reversed and it was a Democrat debate&#8230; or a FOX News debate, you would be praising the employee who outed the plant.</p>
	<p>Your hypocrisy knows no bounds.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: tinatracy</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/11/30/another-kerr-article/#comment-60588</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2007 17:41:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/11/30/another-kerr-article/#comment-60588</guid>
					<description>&quot;However, this particular question was leading (”Why do you feel they’re not responsible enough…” is very similar to “When did you stop beating your wife?” No?)&quot;
yes, just like the demo yuoutube debate question that asked if they would raise taxes &quot;like all democrats do&quot;
 


&quot;But I have another question about this incident. Wasn’t the whole purpose of the YouTube debate to be questions from the “average” American?&quot;

Ah so if you are successful you can't ask a question? What's the litmus test? How much you earn? Your work title?
The Average American, at l;east in my mind, is successful, no?

and that was not the darn question ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>&#8220;However, this particular question was leading (”Why do you feel they’re not responsible enough…” is very similar to “When did you stop beating your wife?” No?)&#8221;<br />
yes, just like the demo yuoutube debate question that asked if they would raise taxes &#8220;like all democrats do&#8221;</p>
	<p>&#8220;But I have another question about this incident. Wasn’t the whole purpose of the YouTube debate to be questions from the “average” American?&#8221;</p>
	<p>Ah so if you are successful you can&#8217;t ask a question? What&#8217;s the litmus test? How much you earn? Your work title?<br />
The Average American, at l;east in my mind, is successful, no?</p>
	<p>and that was not the darn question ;)
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: tinatracy</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/11/30/another-kerr-article/#comment-60587</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2007 17:30:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/11/30/another-kerr-article/#comment-60587</guid>
					<description>William, there are many many undecided voters, do their issues not count because the candidates, or you the straight up republican viewer, don't care? 
And frankly I think these candidates care very much about Gays...just not in the way the gays want them too:O

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>William, there are many many undecided voters, do their issues not count because the candidates, or you the straight up republican viewer, don&#8217;t care?<br />
And frankly I think these candidates care very much about Gays&#8230;just not in the way the gays want them too:O
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: William</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/11/30/another-kerr-article/#comment-60583</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2007 17:12:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/11/30/another-kerr-article/#comment-60583</guid>
					<description>tinatracy:

I'll grant you that there were intelligent questions asked, but that's not the issue.

The problem is that is was a Republican debate before the Republican primary.  And you had a bunch of Democrats asking about the things THEY care about.  Not the things that Republican primary voters care about.  CNN allowed Democrats to hijack a Republican debate.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>tinatracy:</p>
	<p>I&#8217;ll grant you that there were intelligent questions asked, but that&#8217;s not the issue.</p>
	<p>The problem is that is was a Republican debate before the Republican primary.  And you had a bunch of Democrats asking about the things THEY care about.  Not the things that Republican primary voters care about.  CNN allowed Democrats to hijack a Republican debate.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: ImNotBlue</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/11/30/another-kerr-article/#comment-60581</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2007 17:09:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/11/30/another-kerr-article/#comment-60581</guid>
					<description>&quot;...nut the dran questions.&quot;
tinatracy — November 30, 2007 @ 3:47 pm 

Um, what?

Although, I mostly agree with what you've said, that I can understand.  The candidates need to be able to answer all types of questions, no matter who asks it.  However, this particular question was leading (&quot;Why do you feel they're not responsible enough...&quot; is very similar to &quot;When did you stop beating your wife?&quot; No?) and CNN should have disclosed the credentials of the person asking it.  If CNN had said this is so-and-so, a former general and strong gay-military-rights advocate, they would have been fine.

But I have another question about this incident.  Wasn't the whole purpose of the YouTube debate to be questions from the &quot;average&quot; American?  How is a retired General, an &quot;average&quot; American?  &quot;Average&quot; should be Tony, the guy at the deli... or Anne, the woman at the supermarket.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>&#8220;&#8230;nut the dran questions.&#8221;<br />
tinatracy — November 30, 2007 @ 3:47 pm </p>
	<p>Um, what?</p>
	<p>Although, I mostly agree with what you&#8217;ve said, that I can understand.  The candidates need to be able to answer all types of questions, no matter who asks it.  However, this particular question was leading (&#8221;Why do you feel they&#8217;re not responsible enough&#8230;&#8221; is very similar to &#8220;When did you stop beating your wife?&#8221; No?) and CNN should have disclosed the credentials of the person asking it.  If CNN had said this is so-and-so, a former general and strong gay-military-rights advocate, they would have been fine.</p>
	<p>But I have another question about this incident.  Wasn&#8217;t the whole purpose of the YouTube debate to be questions from the &#8220;average&#8221; American?  How is a retired General, an &#8220;average&#8221; American?  &#8220;Average&#8221; should be Tony, the guy at the deli&#8230; or Anne, the woman at the supermarket.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Judy Stage</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/11/30/another-kerr-article/#comment-60576</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2007 15:59:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/11/30/another-kerr-article/#comment-60576</guid>
					<description>RGL, I did not put this incident in the context of a whistleblower, only unprofessionalism with colleagues, however, Using the word integrity in connection with Bill Bennett seems far out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>RGL, I did not put this incident in the context of a whistleblower, only unprofessionalism with colleagues, however, Using the word integrity in connection with Bill Bennett seems far out.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: tinatracy</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/11/30/another-kerr-article/#comment-60575</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2007 15:47:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/11/30/another-kerr-article/#comment-60575</guid>
					<description>I once served on a democratic Governors committee, I didn't vote for her, but the cause was something I cared about...does that preclude me from asking a democratic candidate a question? I sure hope not.

If people ask intelligent and articulate questions I don't care if they are purple aliens, the answer should be the litmis test nut the dran questions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I once served on a democratic Governors committee, I didn&#8217;t vote for her, but the cause was something I cared about&#8230;does that preclude me from asking a democratic candidate a question? I sure hope not.</p>
	<p>If people ask intelligent and articulate questions I don&#8217;t care if they are purple aliens, the answer should be the litmis test nut the dran questions.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: RGL</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/11/30/another-kerr-article/#comment-60572</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2007 15:35:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/11/30/another-kerr-article/#comment-60572</guid>
					<description>Judy and my view, have you heard of a whistleblower? We need somebody with the integrity of Bennett to ferret out dirty practices CNN was caught doing with its pants down. Hallelujah, Bill Bennett! Some people don't know the meaning of corruption.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Judy and my view, have you heard of a whistleblower? We need somebody with the integrity of Bennett to ferret out dirty practices CNN was caught doing with its pants down. Hallelujah, Bill Bennett! Some people don&#8217;t know the meaning of corruption.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: myview</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/11/30/another-kerr-article/#comment-60567</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2007 14:06:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/11/30/another-kerr-article/#comment-60567</guid>
					<description>#3: I agree with you. Surely Bennett could have found the time or the right person to pass along this information to off air. It was unprofessional and I do wonder how long he actually sat on this information in the first place. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>#3: I agree with you. Surely Bennett could have found the time or the right person to pass along this information to off air. It was unprofessional and I do wonder how long he actually sat on this information in the first place.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Judy Stage</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/11/30/another-kerr-article/#comment-60559</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2007 13:28:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/11/30/another-kerr-article/#comment-60559</guid>
					<description>IMO Bennett is the bad guy. It seems rather unprofessional for him to blurt that out on the air.  I assume he is a paid Republican analyst for CNN and with that statement undermined his employer. Sounds like grounds for losing your job to me.
He would not be on my payroll. 
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>IMO Bennett is the bad guy. It seems rather unprofessional for him to blurt that out on the air.  I assume he is a paid Republican analyst for CNN and with that statement undermined his employer. Sounds like grounds for losing your job to me.<br />
He would not be on my payroll.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: myview</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/11/30/another-kerr-article/#comment-60553</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2007 12:48:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/11/30/another-kerr-article/#comment-60553</guid>
					<description>So you think Kerr is lying also?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>So you think Kerr is lying also?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: RGL</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/11/30/another-kerr-article/#comment-60546</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2007 12:00:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/11/30/another-kerr-article/#comment-60546</guid>
					<description>Please stop lying and just tell the truth. CNN is making up stories to cover up for its lies. Shame!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Please stop lying and just tell the truth. CNN is making up stories to cover up for its lies. Shame!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
