So tell me again why the Fox fans are being maligned?

So let’s see… since you seem to know what’s going on at FNC… do you actually watch FNC them? Probably not, or you would already know the things you’re saying are wrong… but I guess you can make those up too.

Gibson slams him on the RADIO… not on television. O’Reilly does not slam him, never mentions him by name, and usually when talking about MSNBC, talks about NBC as whole, rather than focusing on one particular person.

However, all this is moot. You’ve made a claim about something you admitted don’t know anything about. When asked to back it up (you know, provide some actual proof or evidence), you start up with name calling and the personal insults. So I guess you’ve really taken those few Countdown episodes to heart… followed their script to a T.

I guess it was my fault for asking you to provide evidence for the things you claim are facts… my bad. Perhaps I expect too much… like honesty, facts, and oh I don’t know… the truth. When you learn what any one of those are, come back… we’ll talk then.

Anything? No? Oh well, thanks for playing… please try again later.

Terance: To me the “its” in your post is my cable company; hoping Comcast will be bought out by 2013! :)

KO and FNC/FBN both just need to shut up re: the other. I feel like I am on the playground with my 3rd graders.

Maybe to shore up the 2-3 a.m slot on Saturday morning.

Agreed but I would word it Olbermann criticizes FOX. FOX criticizes Olbermann. Double yawn.

Or, to make it more comprehensive, FNC criticizes MSNBC. MSNBC criticizes FNC and so on and so on. The whole thing is totally tired and boring.

All daily, typical, non-newsworthy occurrences.

“And the pissing contest continues…
If Olberman isn’t a threat to FNC, why do they keep dogging him and why does Bill-O never mention his name?”

Dogging - verb (used with object) - to follow or track like a dog, esp. with hostile intent; hound.

I fail to see FNC doing this. FNC responds to Olbermann’s attacks (sometimes), but so very rarely goes after him without provocation. This instance is exactly the same… KO attacks, FNC responds… but responds forcefully. I think the real question is why is KO always dogging FNC.

Why does O’Reilly never mention is name… why should he? Why give the guy more publicity? KO lies and smears O’Reilly in pursuit of ratings almost every night… why should O’Reilly even acknowledge that? He shouldn’t… and he doesn’t. O’Reilly has talked about some of the crazy theories and lies KO has put forth as fact… but again, why do anything that might help their ratings?

I think this is another case of “we can attack you…” but if anything is said in response, “you’re a bully.”

“IMB, because they always make snarky and offensive comments to any criticism and never reveal their identities.”

Yes, that is what we’re talking about. Although, I can’t remember a time when their comments weren’t in response to a specific attack leveled at FNC. With that in mind, I question how “offensive” their comment is, compared with the original comment. Is that comment offensive too, or is it just because it’s FNC that the comment is “offensive”?

“It’s just dishonest and unprofessional.”

Again, why? Why is it “dishonest” not to give an identity? Why is it “unp[professional”? The spokesperson’s job is to talk about, and defend when needed, FNC… not draw attention to themselves. By not releasing the name, the focus is on the network… not on that particular person. In other words… KO has to keep attacking FNC, not go after one person… it keeps the playing field a little more level. KO has a whole show to attack… the FNC Spokesperson has an email, a letter, or a phone call… in keeping them anonymous, at least he can’t go after them personally.

Be sure and check back on ICN between 2011-2013 when your cable company adds FBN.. if its still in biz, eh.

I don’t get it… what’s the problem?