<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/1.5.1-alpha" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: CNBC wants to know what you think of FBN talent?</title>
	<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/12/02/counterintelligence/</link>
	<description>Unvarnished news &#038; opinion on cable news</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 00:50:08 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=1.5.1-alpha</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: jake</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/12/02/counterintelligence/#comment-61090</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2007 16:55:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/12/02/counterintelligence/#comment-61090</guid>
					<description>HAHAHA, CNBC should have no worry about FBN.  Have you watched that crap!?  It is like sitting behind a granny in an Oldsmobile on the freeway, breath takingly slow/stupid.  I tried, I did try. I like how they want to make it easier to understand if you are not so smart on the market, but JESUS!  Anyways, this survey was to poke fun, I am sure, cause their anchors are horrible....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>HAHAHA, CNBC should have no worry about FBN.  Have you watched that crap!?  It is like sitting behind a granny in an Oldsmobile on the freeway, breath takingly slow/stupid.  I tried, I did try. I like how they want to make it easier to understand if you are not so smart on the market, but JESUS!  Anyways, this survey was to poke fun, I am sure, cause their anchors are horrible&#8230;.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Shane</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/12/02/counterintelligence/#comment-60952</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2007 08:52:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/12/02/counterintelligence/#comment-60952</guid>
					<description>Thank You for your time Spuds.Good Job!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Thank You for your time Spuds.Good Job!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/12/02/counterintelligence/#comment-60921</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 20:33:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/12/02/counterintelligence/#comment-60921</guid>
					<description>^That's not me! =p</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>^That&#8217;s not me! =p
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/12/02/counterintelligence/#comment-60916</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 19:37:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/12/02/counterintelligence/#comment-60916</guid>
					<description>On a recent cnbc.com video interview with Tyler Mattheson(sp?), about her trip to China with Buffet, Becky Quick was asked, if she asked Buffet for advice on renegotiating contracts. She seem surprised at the question and her response was &quot;it's best to go in as a group.&quot; Wonder if this poll has something to do with her's(and other CNBC'ers) contract negotiations...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>On a recent cnbc.com video interview with Tyler Mattheson(sp?), about her trip to China with Buffet, Becky Quick was asked, if she asked Buffet for advice on renegotiating contracts. She seem surprised at the question and her response was &#8220;it&#8217;s best to go in as a group.&#8221; Wonder if this poll has something to do with her&#8217;s(and other CNBC&#8217;ers) contract negotiations&#8230;
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Spud</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/12/02/counterintelligence/#comment-60895</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 16:41:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/12/02/counterintelligence/#comment-60895</guid>
					<description>No. You probably wouldn't have gotten the ranker. I've had that happen to me where I get like 6 questions in and then suddenly it jumps to the end and thanks me for my time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>No. You probably wouldn&#8217;t have gotten the ranker. I&#8217;ve had that happen to me where I get like 6 questions in and then suddenly it jumps to the end and thanks me for my time.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: jethro klampit</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/12/02/counterintelligence/#comment-60888</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 16:03:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/12/02/counterintelligence/#comment-60888</guid>
					<description>Fox Biz is unwatchable...   and not only cuz they are still unavailable in most areas!!

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Fox Biz is unwatchable&#8230;   and not only cuz they are still unavailable in most areas!!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/12/02/counterintelligence/#comment-60886</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 15:08:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/12/02/counterintelligence/#comment-60886</guid>
					<description>Well I'm not 100% sure Missy, but a previous question on the survey was whether or not I watch FBN at all.  I guess if I had answered NO (or 0%), then I might have not got the ranker for FBN talent.  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Well I&#8217;m not 100% sure Missy, but a previous question on the survey was whether or not I watch FBN at all.  I guess if I had answered NO (or 0%), then I might have not got the ranker for FBN talent.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: spiffo</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/12/02/counterintelligence/#comment-60880</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 13:05:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/12/02/counterintelligence/#comment-60880</guid>
					<description>Dangerous, indeed.  Especially if Jenna Lee is on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Dangerous, indeed.  Especially if Jenna Lee is on.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Missy</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/12/02/counterintelligence/#comment-60872</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 12:12:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/12/02/counterintelligence/#comment-60872</guid>
					<description>So CNBC wants its viewers to switch over to FBN to watch for a while?  Isn't this dangerous - what if people switch over and get hooked?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>So CNBC wants its viewers to switch over to FBN to watch for a while?  Isn&#8217;t this dangerous - what if people switch over and get hooked?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Terance</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/12/02/counterintelligence/#comment-60862</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 06:51:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/12/02/counterintelligence/#comment-60862</guid>
					<description>I find it interesting CNBC included FBN talent. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I find it interesting CNBC included FBN talent.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/12/02/counterintelligence/#comment-60846</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Dec 2007 23:30:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/12/02/counterintelligence/#comment-60846</guid>
					<description>I don't think this is for poaching purposes, but maybe for scheduling reasons?  Like maybe they'll put FBN favourites against CNBC favourites?  Or maybe they're just curious what people think of FBN's talent?  There were a lot of other questions too, stuff like do you think they report fairly, without bias etc. etc. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I don&#8217;t think this is for poaching purposes, but maybe for scheduling reasons?  Like maybe they&#8217;ll put FBN favourites against CNBC favourites?  Or maybe they&#8217;re just curious what people think of FBN&#8217;s talent?  There were a lot of other questions too, stuff like do you think they report fairly, without bias etc. etc.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Lurker</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/12/02/counterintelligence/#comment-60841</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Dec 2007 23:14:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/12/02/counterintelligence/#comment-60841</guid>
					<description>Is this how they want to poach FBN talent? What if Liz Claman is rated really good? Are they going to try to poach her? LOL</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Is this how they want to poach FBN talent? What if Liz Claman is rated really good? Are they going to try to poach her? LOL
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/12/02/counterintelligence/#comment-60827</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Dec 2007 21:50:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/12/02/counterintelligence/#comment-60827</guid>
					<description>Oohhhh those are my screencaps!! :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Oohhhh those are my screencaps!! :)
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: ImNotBlue</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/12/02/counterintelligence/#comment-60826</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Dec 2007 21:49:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/12/02/counterintelligence/#comment-60826</guid>
					<description>What about all those articles about how unconcerned CNBC is about FNC?

Uh-ohhh... somebody's slip is showing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>What about all those articles about how unconcerned CNBC is about FNC?</p>
	<p>Uh-ohhh&#8230; somebody&#8217;s slip is showing.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
