Inside Cable News

December 6, 2007

Mike Huckabee on Morning Joe…

Presidential candidate Mike Huckabee was intereviewed on Morning Joe this morning. Transcript follows…

JOE SCARBOROUGH, MSNBC HOST: You look at the national policy, this guy right here, Mike Huckabee, Governor Mike Huckabee has shot to first, the Rasmussen poll has him ahead of everybody else. He is with us now.

Former governor of Arkansas and Republican presidential candidate Mike Huckabee. Sitting there on top of the Rasmussen poll, 20 percent nationally. Governor, let me start by asking you, now that you are ahead, are you going to lose your sense of humor? Can you still talk to us about Hendrix and cougar hunting and Willie Geist?

MIKE HUCKABEE, (R) PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE: Well, I certainly would hope so, Joe.

In fact, when I was hearing the bumper music coming in, “All Along the Watchtower,” it occurred to me there is a shot of White House, Hendrix music playing, that’s the Huckabee White House. Hendrix music blasting throughout the White House as the president stands all along the watch tower.

MIKA BRZEZINSKI, MSNBC HOST: There you go. You have to invite to us that White House.

SCARBOROUGH: Would like to. Also, Willie Geist sends his best. He is not here today. But he wanted to us remind you that he was with you from the very beginning. Even when you outed him at his cougar hunting antics.

HUCKABEE: Well, when I saw him in the L.A. Airport and I knew what he was there for, I know, we all know.

BRZEZINSKI: Oh, Lord.

SCARBOROUGH: Exactly. Let’s talk about what is going to happen this morning. Mitt Romney is going out giving a speech talking about his faith. You have been criticized for not coming out and saying that you believe that Mitt Romney is a Christian. Do you think he is a Christian?

HUCKABEE: That is only for Mitt Romney to decide. I can barely describe for myself, being a Christian means you follow Jesus Christ and you take a look at that by a person’s testimony and life. Mitt Romney shouldn’t be judged for his fitness of the presidency based on his religion. And should he be asked about his? No more than I should be about mine and nobody is going to ask more about his faith than me.

Mitt Romney hasn’t been questioned nearly as much as I have. I get all the God questions in the debate. Every time I do a news conference people want to talk to me about my faith. Which is fine, happy to talk about it. But beyond that, it is not a qualification to be president and there is certainly not a litmus test ever religion this order to be president.

SCARBOROUGH: But if I asked you if say Billy Graham was a Christian, would you say Billy Graham was a Christian?

HUCKABEE: Well, he openly says he is and I have no reason to doubt him, but once again, Joe, when you ask someone to judge …

SCARBOROUGH: But Mitt Romney has openly said that, too, that he is a Christian, right?

HUCKABEE: He has said that he is a Mormon and also says that he follows Jesus Christ, I take him at his word. I take that at face value. I have no reason to question that. But I think people are asking me to try to dissect his faith and quite frankly, not only am I not going to do that, I’m not qualified to do that.

SCARBOROUGH: What do you think about the timing of Mitt Romney’s speech this morning? Do you think it may be because you are shooting ahead in the Iowa polls and the national polls? I can’t believe, what have you raised, like $45? I cannot believe, I have been going around, you have blown up every cynical notion I had about presidential politics my entire adult life because I have always said it comes down to money. Except for Jimmy Carter it has always come down to who had the most money a year out.

HUCKABEE: And isn’t it refreshing that the American people are rejecting that ridiculous notion that you can buy the White House. That is what is happening in our campaign, Joe. We are getting contributions. I got the most precious e-mail from man that sent me a $20 contribution. He is a janitor, his wife is disabled. He said this is all I can do right now but I want a guy like you to be president. That’s why we are doing so well. It’s not about how much money we raised. But we are raising the hopes and the dreams of Americans who believe that this country can still be a place where you can raise your kids, not so much because you are a hard core Democratic or a hard core Republican, because you are an American who believes in this nation. I’m excited about it, I think the is the most amazing thing that’s happening and I’m in the middle of it and frankly, I don’t understand it.

SCARBOROUGH: Governor, let’s talk about a Huffington Post report. You had suggested last week when we were talking to you as you started to make movement in Iowa, that the attacks would come. Well, yesterday they came and you read that report. It is stunning. You have a letter from a young woman who says she was raped while her three-year-old lay in bed next to her. She wrote you a letter, she begged you not to let this man out of prison and you ignored her letter. And that is what we heard on the Huffington Post and other people followed up on that. Is that the truth? Did that happen?

HUCKABEE: No. It is not. You know, Joe, let’s first of all look at the source, the Huffington Post, one of the most left-wing blogs in the blogosphere. There are factual errors in what they have printed, some are outrageously incorrect. The fact is on this case, and it is a horrible case. Let me first of all say my heart goes out to the families of victims because there is nothing anybody can do or ever say that will make their pain go away. The only thing that I think is just despicable is to use their grief and pain as a political weapon.

And what a sad state of affairs it is in this country when we exploit people’s pain for political purposes. That is what is happening. My role in that case was that I actually denied commutation. He was paroled by a parole board that was solely Jim Guy Tucker and Bill Clinton appointees. He was made parole eligible by Bill Clinton and by Jim Guy Tucker 1992, four years before I became governor. And the Huffington Post just doesn’t want to give the whole story of what was going on.

SCARBOROUGH: Well, you talk about the Huffington Post, but do you not expect to see 30-second advertisements talking about this just because that is the way politics is?

HUCKABEE: Absolutely.

SCARBOROUGH: And it will be Republican third-party groups. It will probably drop two days before the Iowa caucuses. How do you fight that?

HUCKABEE: You fight it by just hoping that people will do a little research on their own. You fight it also by believing that a lot of people are so sick of this kind of politics where a candidate can’t present his own platform, can’t talk about what he would go for America. Only wants to talk about what is wrong with the other candidate.

One reason, Joe, that you see these poll numbers for me is I’m not out there attacking the other guys. I’m talking about what I think ought to make America a better place and how we can get there. And if I spent my time telling you what is wrong with Mitt Romney’s religion or what is wrong with Fred Thompson, then the question would be why would people vote for me? All I’m doing is asking them is not to vote for somebody else. That is a demolition derby, that’s not an election. And I’m not interested in disabling the other Republicans. I’m interested in leading this country and giving it the kind of positive leadership that I think people are hungry for. I don’t care what party they are in. They are looking for somebody who believes in America. Not somebody who just doesn’t believe in the other people running for president.

SCARBOROUGH: Governor, let’s bring in David Shuster here, the man who made you governor by taking down your predecessor while he was a reporter in Arkansas.

DAVID SHUSTER, MSNBC CORRESPONDENT: Well, to be fair and I have said this before, I have always said this since 1996, that I thought Governor Huckabee had the best political skills, raw political talent of anybody I have covered, but Governor Huckabee, since I have been in Arkansas, I know that it is ridiculous for people to claim that you somehow pressured a parole board that as you said was filled with people from Bill Clinton and Jim Guy Tucker. But the key question with this Wayne Dumont story is, did you agree with the parole board as your former aide, Olin “Butch” Reeves (ph) suggests when he says that you agreed with the parole board’s decision regarding Wayne Dumont?

HUCKABEE: I did, David. I agreed with it. I regret agreeing with it, but I did. Now agreeing with it that doesn’t mean that I had an official role because as you well know in Arkansas law, a governor cannot initiate a parole and a governor can’t stop a parole. That is the sole domain of the parole board.

I did support what they did. And before me was a commutation request that would have further reduced his sentence meaning he didn’t have to go to the parole board. That’s what I denied which kept him in the domain of the parole board instead of just simply turning his lose. Even after that, I denied further come mutation requests, three additional times.

And there is something about that statement. Mr. Reeves is outraged today because the Huffington Post totally misrepresented and just utterly distorted his statements. We have a statement from Mr. Reeves that will be on our website, mikehuckabee.com today, and I think you will find out that this agenda of the Huffington Post is outrageously misleading. Let’s go beyond, it is just down right false.

BRZEZINSKI: Governor, if I could ask a question back on Mitt Romney, he is giving his speech today, this morning carried live on most of the cable networks here on MSNBC. It is going to get a lot of play and there is going to be the presence of a former president there which will add to it. What do you make, I just want to hear the answer to one of Joe’s questions that we didn’t get. What do you make of the timing of the speech and do you think you are the reason?

HUCKABEE: Well, I don’t think I’m the reason. I think it is a good thing. Because he has had a lot of questions. Frankly, if somebody wants to ask me that question and will give me an opportunity to go live on all the networks and talk about my faith, sign me up. I’m ready to go.

SCARBOROUGH: I disagree, I think Jesus is the reason for the reason, and I think Mike Huckabee is the reason for the speech. Look at those polls.

BRZEZINSKI: You have been saying that all morning and the Romney campaign does not agree with that at least Ann Romney, who I interviewed this week, says it was Mitt’s decision to make a speech. It had nothing to do with Governor Huckabee. But Governor Huckabee, since I have you here, I would love to meet your wife.

HUCKABEE: I would love you to meet my wife. She is a delightful lady. She has put up with me for going on 34 years which in itself tells you she is extraordinarily patient and just forgiving woman to give me almost 34 years of marriage and three grown children.

BRZEZINSKI: We’ll have to line that up then.

SHUSTER: From my years in Arkansas when I saw him. We didn’t talk much about foreign policy when you were first governor, I don’t think we talked about it at all. This week I think there was an exam of that a lot of us in the media glommed on to and that was apparently you didn’t know about the National Intelligence Estimate story. Your staff took responsibility, saying they should have briefed you.

But it gets to the idea that being governor of Arkansas is not necessarily best sort of foreign policy experience and that something that I think a lot of your critics are aiming at your direction. How do you respond to them?

HUCKABEE: Well, I don’t blame my staff. It is a situation where a report was released at 10:00 in the morning, the president hadn’t seen it in four years and I’m supposed to see it four hours later.

There were 16 different agencies involved in accumulating the NIE report. Many of those agencies had classified documents. Nobody’s seen, I guess except the president all of the classified information. There was a section of the report that was declassified. I was in a wall to wall, nonstop campaign because guys like you were trailing me with cameras and microphones all day on the trail.

We sat down to dinner and it was a gottcha question. OK, have you seen the report that was released this morning? And I wanted to say no because you guys have been with me all day, you know what I have been doing.

SCARBOROUGH: And let me say this, for people that haven’t run a campaign before, and I was only ran a little campaign every couple of years running for Congress. But a gubernatorial campaign or a senate campaign. You go nonstop. And a lot of times, you wake up the next morning, you are like oh my God, that happened.

I agree with you governor, in the fact, the second I saw the story, total gotcha story.

Let’s move on. After Iowa, obviously you are going to have to go to New Hampshire and you have to go to South Carolina. Then it is Florida, New York, California. I need Howard Dean in here screaming all the states but they come fast and furious. How do you, even if you win in Iowa and let’s say you win this South Carolina. Let’s say even Florida, how to you then handle all the states that hit you on February 5? You won’t have enough money, will you?

HUCKABEE: Well, actually, we raised more money in November alone than we had raised in the previous 10 months combined. The money is beginning to come because the only reason we weren’t raising money before is people said I just don’t know if this guy can win. I like him, like his message, he has the most executive experience anybody is running. Nobody’s run against the Clinton political machine except Mike Huckabee, he has run against it. He has beaten it four times. Nobody else running for president has ever experienced the headwinds of the political machine that we are going to be up against next year. I have.

So for all those reasons, people are now beginning it say in guy could win. And, the same people that told me no several months ago because they didn’t think I could win are looking at these polls and Joe, as you know, it’s not just the ones in Iowa. Now it’s nationally and people are saying that I can win and in fact will win. Many of the polls show against Hillary, I’ve got the best chance of any Republican with the largest margin of actually winning.

SCARBOROUGH: And of course a poll came out yesterday that had to make you smile, an Arkansas poll showed Huckabee ahead of Clinton. Very interesting.

So we’ve been asking — the AP actually went around and asked candidates what was the worst job you that you ever had. Barack Obama, proving that he’s had a very privileged life said ice cream guy, but yours was a department store employee. Tell us about it.

HUCKABEE: Yeah, I worked two jobs when I was a teenager, I worked at the radio station and then I also worked at J.C. Penney as a janitor, stocking the shelves. And I used to have to wipe out of glass doors and it used to irritate me, I would just get them all finished, somebody probably like you Joe, would come up and put his hands up against the glass. And I would have to go clean them off again.

SCARBOROUGH: Yeah, that is me, leaning in …

HUCKABEE: See, Mika would never do that. She would be very, very careful to use the handles of door. Not Joe, he would just go up there and touch the glass and put his fingerprints on it.

BRZEZINSKI: Yeah.

SCARBOROUGH: And you know where Willie Geist would be? He would be inside J.C. Penney hunting cougars.

BRZEZINSKI: Oh, governor. We’re sorry. We apologize.

SCARBOROUGH: Governor, thank you so much for being with us. Congratulations. A remarkable week for you and I have a feeling it is going to be going this way for quite some time.

BRZEZINSKI: It’s been an amazing ride so far.

HUCKABEE: Just remember, we were here first and so, you know, you put me on when nobody else was believing and it made a difference. Thank you and I hope to do it again.

SCARBOROUGH: All right. Thank you so much, governor. Greatly appreciate that.

HUCKABEE: Thanks.

Filed under: Cable News, MSNBC - Spud

40 Comments »

TrackBack: http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/12/06/mike-huckabee-on-morning-joe/trackback/

  1. An excellent interview with the man who may be our next president. He is a straight guy who harbors no animosity towards his opponents. He says things as he sees them. I like the idea he beat the Clinton machine four times in Arkansas. If only he could change his stance on illegal immigration, he would be my man, too.

    Comment by RGL — December 6, 2007 @ 12:23 pm

  2. Can anyone imagine that hick Huckabee as president of the United States?
    I could go on and on about Huckabee’s record. But let’s start with his “pardons” records.
    He granted 669 clemencies during his governorship.
    The three previous govenors, in 18 years total, granted only 507.
    Pardon me if I have stepped over the line. I know this is not a political forum.
    On the other hand, if you watched Mitt Romney’s speech this morning, can you imagine not electing him?

    Comment by Cella — December 6, 2007 @ 12:26 pm

  3. A religious zealot who doesn’t believe in evolution not only won’t be President, but won’t be the GOP nominee - unless the GOP wants to relegate itself to the far fringes for the next generation or so.

    Comment by Amused — December 6, 2007 @ 12:36 pm

  4. Willard Romney is a slick phony, who often turns into a nasty, condescending jerk when his buttons are pushed.

    Comment by Amused — December 6, 2007 @ 12:38 pm

  5. Amused, you bozo. Mitt Romney was first in his class in Harvard, saved that Winter Olympics from certain disaster, succeeded in business as nobody else did from his opponents, became governor of a state where nobody speaks only to God and Ted Kennedy, and appears the most articulate of the candidates from either side. Plus, he is honest, believes in the sanctity of marriage, has the best agenda that most Americans would embrace.

    Bozo needs to bone up on his measly knowledge about politics. He sounds so vacuous with his caveman’s rants. I want to call him a troglodyte, but he may not understand that.

    Comment by RGL — December 6, 2007 @ 1:08 pm

  6. RGL, we know that you didn’t go to Harvard, because nowhere in what I posted did I ever question Willard’s intellect and business achievements - just his temperament and his apparent inability to hold onto his political convictions for any substantial period of time.

    I’d hardly call him intellectually honest when his stances on social conservative issues (about which I hardly care) change depending on what office he’s seeking in any given year.

    As the old saying goes, I’ve forgotten more about politics than you will ever know. But I didn’t forget that when he was running for various offices in Taxachusetts, he ran as a fairly liberal, pro-choice Republican. He is also smarmy and comes off as a nasty, condescending ass.

    Oh, and unlike you, at least I don’t stoop to inane, unoriginal name-calling when I can’t think of a clever retort to those who are obviously my intellectual superiors.

    Comment by Amused — December 6, 2007 @ 1:23 pm

  7. Please, please, please . . . no more governors from Arkansas.

    Comment by PF — December 6, 2007 @ 1:32 pm

  8. Amused, bravo on taking the high road. The scum on the right is increasingly resorting to personal attacks.

    Comment by elmonica — December 6, 2007 @ 1:46 pm

  9. HAHAHAHAHA… I love it when El criticizes people for “personal attacks.”

    El, I’m convinced you don’t own a mirror… Don’t worry, I’m gonna buy one for you.

    Comment by ImNotBlue — December 6, 2007 @ 1:50 pm

  10. “He is also smarmy and comes off as a nasty, condescending ass”
    And Shrillary . . .?

    Comment by PF — December 6, 2007 @ 2:40 pm

  11. This guy is a lib trying to pass himself off as a conservative. He’s weak on immigration..unbelievably weak on crime (issuing more pardons than Arkansas’ 6 neighboring states combined!). He pardoned 11 convicted murderers! How anyone could vote for this clown is beyond me.

    It’s nice that the media is finally starting to look at his record.

    Comment by bigred — December 6, 2007 @ 2:50 pm

  12. WOW! So many haters of Christians. WOW!

    Comment by Shane — December 6, 2007 @ 3:13 pm

  13. ^10: Watching debates in a hypthetical match-up bet. Willard and Hillary would be unbearable, as they are both alternately shrill and seemingly pleasant (at least on the surface).

    Comment by Amused — December 6, 2007 @ 3:22 pm

  14. ^12: Oh really? Name one.

    Comment by Amused — December 6, 2007 @ 3:24 pm

  15. Shane, that’s the second time you’ve posted that. I AM a Christian. I don’t hate anyone. But I don’t think being a Christian qualifies anyone to be the leader of the most powerful country in the world.

    Huckster has major judgement issues, and needs to be avoided at all costs. I don’t see how you can look at his record and vote for him. He’s more of spineless lib than Hillary & company.

    Comment by bigred — December 6, 2007 @ 3:24 pm

  16. Whoever can beat the dems is my motto. There’s probably 2 Supreme Court Justices waiting out GWB. We need a win in 08 badly. No time for nitpicking.

    Comment by Lurker — December 6, 2007 @ 3:33 pm

  17. Lurker, the problem is that a hardcore social conservative, uber religious GOP candidate will almost certainly hand the White House to that Marxist in a polyester pantsuit.

    Comment by Amused — December 6, 2007 @ 3:43 pm

  18. Yea, Huckster probably won’t get the nomination, alot of conservatives don’t like McCain but in alot of the polls I’m seeing in key battleground states, McCain beats out all the dems by a pretty good margin compared to the others.

    Comment by Lurker — December 6, 2007 @ 3:51 pm

  19. Lurker, the libs would have a field day ripping the Huckster apart. He has no shot of beating Hillary or Obama. We need to rally around Fred Thompson.

    Comment by bigred — December 6, 2007 @ 3:56 pm

  20. Lurker, based on polling work that I’ve been doing for the past few months, it’s going to be Romney, McCain, or Giuliani.

    Each has at least some conservative cred, but none is considered “too threatening” by the middle-of-the-road/undecideds.

    Bigred: Fred has never caught on and some analysts believe, if Huck wins Iowa, he becomes the rallying point for social conservatives and Fred is gone.

    Comment by Amused — December 6, 2007 @ 4:02 pm

  21. #3-#14-Amused you are the winner.

    Comment by Shane — December 6, 2007 @ 4:31 pm

  22. Shane, just because one does not like religious zealots - the kind who want to make this country a theocracy - doesn’t mean that one is against any religion.

    Huckabee is a classic example of the kind of person who would let his religious beliefs make decisions for him. I don’t want a president who’d look to the Bible for specifics on how to handle, for example, the subprime mortgage crisis or Iran.

    Comment by Amused — December 6, 2007 @ 4:36 pm

  23. Blue: If Elmonica ever looked in a mirror, it would shatter into a thousand pieces! (Sorry, couldn’t resist).

    Amused: Among all the candidates, who do you favor at this point in time?

    Comment by Ira — December 6, 2007 @ 4:48 pm

  24. Ira, my first choice is Rudy. I could live with McCain as the nominee, and hold my nose while voting for Romney.

    Who do you like?

    Comment by Amused — December 6, 2007 @ 4:51 pm

  25. I’m w/”Amused” in the hierarchy of candidates. But I’m still hoping for a miracle w/Duncan Hunter!

    Anyway, back to cable TV, etc. It’s great that Huck is a baptist minister, but I don’t trust him on illegal immigration, and his record on granting pardons to criminals is enough for me to keep from voting for him. But isn’t it curious that the MSM is so wild about him? I am SURE they want him to be the nominee, as they must feel that he can’t beat the dem candidate. Anyone else have any ideas why they would be pusihng a conservative so much?

    Comment by Missy — December 6, 2007 @ 5:47 pm

  26. Because he’s not really a conservative. He’s anti-abortion and anti-gay marriage, but he’s liberal on every other stance.

    He comes across as a likable guy, and answers their questions with stupid one-liners. They would love for him to beat real conservatives like Fred or Duncan. They’ve done nothing but tear down Fred Thompson since he entered the race, even though he’s unveiled the most extensive and thorough policy positions.

    A Fred-Duncan ticket would do the trick. A Huckabee nomination would ensure a Hillary victory.

    Comment by bigred — December 6, 2007 @ 5:55 pm

  27. Missy, I also like Hunter, but he is way too conservative to win the general election. That said, my ideal would be for him to serve in some capacity in a Giuliani White House. :-D

    I don’t trust Huckabee on a number of issues, including taxes and his tendency toward nanny state tactics (ask people from Arkansas about his plan to have schoolkids’ BMI tested and put in their records).

    The MSM is so into Huckabee because he’s a charming and glib speaker, and also because if he were to get the nomination, they’d have a field day with him. I can already imagine the spoofs and cartoons showing him riding a dinosaur. And then there’s the cheesy way he left the Governor’s mansion — he and his wife created a “bridal registry” in order to furnish their home.

    When the media get through with him, “Hee Haw” and the “Beverly Hillbillies” will look sophisticated in comparison to him.

    Comment by Amused — December 6, 2007 @ 7:07 pm

  28. religious zealots=Christians you win again Amused.You hate all religons!Can you please run down your list?

    Comment by Shane — December 6, 2007 @ 7:28 pm

  29. Shane, since you are obviously incapable of rational thought and discussion, I’m going to leave you to play with yourself. I’m sure you have plenty of experience with that.

    Comment by Amused — December 6, 2007 @ 7:49 pm

  30. Amused, I find the Huckster’s leniency on criminals far more troublesome. 11 murderers, including cop killers getting off because of him. A rapist, who then murdered two more people. This guy is a joke.

    Comment by bigred — December 6, 2007 @ 7:50 pm

  31. Bigred, I find much about Huckabee to be disturbing. I agree with you about the overly lenient treatment of criminals, but I also believe that his religious zealotry is a major problem as well.

    Comment by Amused — December 6, 2007 @ 8:02 pm

  32. Amused: I am also leaning towards Rudy, he has the best chance of upending Hillary. I can live with the fact that he (and Romney) governed as a liberal-moderate, that’s the lay of the land in NYC and Mass.

    But I’m more annoyed that Rudy endorsed Mario Cuomo in 1994. Living with Arnold in California, I’m sick of successful moderate Republican politicians doing nothing for their party.

    Comment by Ira — December 6, 2007 @ 8:52 pm

  33. Based on the polls I’m seeing McCain has even better #’s going against any of the dems then Rudy. Plus I don’t trust Rudy to pick Supreme Court Justices. Rudy - pro-choice, pro-gay marriage, anti-gun etc…. McCain has most of the real important conservative values down but he has pissed me off going against Bush on alot of things etc…

    Right now, I just want whoever has the best #’s to defeat the dems and I’ll roll with it. We need this one bad. WQe got atleast 2 SCJ just waiting out Bush. Imagine the court stacked with liberals? All the rulings will go their way.

    Comment by Lurker — December 6, 2007 @ 9:26 pm

  34. Ira: Social conservatives cannot get elected in ultra-liberal places like Taxachusetts and NYC, so I don’t hold that against Rudy and Romney. And in a place like NYC, views on social conservative issues like abortion are largely irrelevant in terms of what a mayor actually can do.

    As for the Cuomo debacle, that was a political calculation in which everyone (except Zogby) expected Cuomo to win for the 4th time in a row and Rudy was just trying to not antagonize someone (someone with a history of holding petty grudges for extended periods of time) who could make things even more difficult for the city.

    The one major thing I didn’t like about Rudy’s tenure as mayor is that he never groomed a successor. Then again, Pataki didn’t do that either, which is why that tool Spitzer is now governor. Ugh.

    Lurker: Rudy is most definitely NOT in favor of gay marriage and is NOT anti-gun, but please don’t let facts get in the way of your diatribe.

    What “real important conservative values” does McCain have?

    I don’t know what poll #s you’re reading, but I’ve seen very little good news for McCain in the raw numbers - and he’s my second choice for the nomination, so it’s not as if I’m trying to trash him.

    Also, in my personal experience, I am meeting and talking with many people who would never have thought of voting for a Republican, but would easily vote for Rudy if he is the nominee. And that is what the GOP needs to target - the ones who normally wouldn’t vote GOP, but can be peeled off from the center and the sane faction of Dems.

    Comment by Amused — December 6, 2007 @ 10:42 pm

  35. With 7 of the 9 current SC justices being Republican appointees, it’s rather silly to be concerned about a court “stacked with liberals” any time soon. The window of opportunity for getting another conservative on the bench closed when the Democrats took back congress this year and they’re slated to pick up more seats in 08 — the main reason so many Republicans are resigning from congress lately to “spend more time with the family”. Rats deserting a sinking ship. Also, Rudy911 WILL NOT be the nominee. The guy’s radio active — 3 marriages, a messy public divorce, estranged from kids, gay friendly, Kerik, etc etc. Elephants never forget. When he loses in Iowa and NH, his campaign will start to unravel and Romney or McCain will end up with the nomination.

    Comment by Reality Check — December 7, 2007 @ 12:17 am

  36. Huckabee is a swell guy… I am glad that he has so clearly expressed his side of the story. Why is Bill Clinton getting a free ass for having Jim Guy Tucker commute the sentence while Huckabee gets blasted even though he denied the commutation?

    Comment by chukmaty — December 7, 2007 @ 12:47 am

  37. umm . . maybe it’s because Hickabee is running for president and Bill Clinton isn’t.

    Comment by deep thinker — December 7, 2007 @ 12:59 am

  38. A Clinton cousin involved in a questionable prosecution of a possibly innocent man? Why does that sound familiar?

    No wonder the Clintons thought it would be easy to railroad Billy Dale and the travel office staff.

    Comment by Jim — December 7, 2007 @ 2:12 am

  39. Huckabee is a swell guy… I am glad that he has so clearly expressed his side of the story. Why is Bill Clinton getting a free ass for having Jim Guy Tucker commute the sentence while Huckabee gets blasted even though he denied the commutation?

    No sentence was commuted, and Huckabee’s catching flack because he pushed the parole to release a convicted rapist simply for the fact that said rapist raped a distant cousin of Bill Clinton and thus became the right’s cause célèbre. And to top it off he went out and raped again. But hey I’m sure it’s still Clinton’s fault.

    Comment by Steve — December 7, 2007 @ 5:29 am

  40. Actually right now on the SC it’s like 4 strong liberals and 4 strong conservatives with Kennedy being the flip flopper. So I was wrong saying stacked full of liberals because the 2 likely SCJ waiting out Bush are Stevens and Ginsburg. I meant we can stack it with conservatives if we win in 08.

    On Free Republic, if you check out the polls people post McCain has the best #’s. Of course not too many people like Rudy or McCain over there.

    Comment by Lurker — December 7, 2007 @ 9:57 am

RSS feed for comments on this post.

Leave a comment



Anti-spam measure: please retype the above text into the box provided.

Get free blog up and running in minutes with Blogsome | Theme designs available here