Comments on: Tuesday’s Numbers… http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/12/19/tuesdays-numbers-64/ Unvarnished news & opinion on cable news Fri, 06 Nov 2009 09:08:44 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=1.5.1-alpha by: StephenMartin http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/12/19/tuesdays-numbers-64/#comment-62549 Thu, 20 Dec 2007 23:50:11 +0000 http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/12/19/tuesdays-numbers-64/#comment-62549 "Cancel that Tucker hole so he can go work at Fox. I have no problem with show being on MSNBC but it is clear that conservatives won’t turn consistently for a network that isn’t 100% dedicated to their ideology 24 hours a day. What a pathetic way to have to earn somebody’s loyalty. Comment by elmonica " And you think you're ideology is better? Aren't liberals supposed to be all inclusive, tolerant, open-minded, unbiased, fair, and generally intellectually above name calling? And if you plan on rebutting with, "Conservatives speak the same way," then you're no better than they are you? So, if I'm thinking of swinging over to the liberal side, what's the incentive? “Cancel that Tucker hole so he can go work at Fox. I have no problem with show being on MSNBC but it is clear that conservatives won’t turn consistently for a network that isn’t 100% dedicated to their ideology 24 hours a day. What a pathetic way to have to earn somebody’s loyalty.

Comment by elmonica ”

And you think you’re ideology is better? Aren’t liberals supposed to be all inclusive, tolerant, open-minded, unbiased, fair, and generally intellectually above name calling? And if you plan on rebutting with, “Conservatives speak the same way,” then you’re no better than they are you?

So, if I’m thinking of swinging over to the liberal side, what’s the incentive?

]]> by: StephenMartin http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/12/19/tuesdays-numbers-64/#comment-62548 Thu, 20 Dec 2007 23:44:51 +0000 http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/12/19/tuesdays-numbers-64/#comment-62548 "I know Tucker is a conservative, but he’s pretty fair and has a great chemistry with his guest (especially the liberal ones)" Tucker is a libertarian. “I know Tucker is a conservative, but he’s pretty fair and has a great chemistry with his guest (especially the liberal ones)”

Tucker is a libertarian.

]]> by: Aaron http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/12/19/tuesdays-numbers-64/#comment-62546 Thu, 20 Dec 2007 23:26:55 +0000 http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/12/19/tuesdays-numbers-64/#comment-62546 >Tucker. >Tucker.

]]> by: Cella http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/12/19/tuesdays-numbers-64/#comment-62528 Thu, 20 Dec 2007 18:30:08 +0000 http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/12/19/tuesdays-numbers-64/#comment-62528 Number 9, I have hated to be mean about Alison. But I completely agree with you about her extreme facial expressions being unsettling. And the way David Shuster stretches his mouth at the corners has gotten on my nerves forever. Tucker is my favorite, so it appears I agree with you on that, also. Number 9,
I have hated to be mean about Alison. But I completely agree with you about her extreme facial expressions being unsettling. And the way David Shuster stretches his mouth at the corners has gotten on my nerves forever.
Tucker is my favorite, so it appears I agree with you on that, also.

]]> by: Obama in 08! http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/12/19/tuesdays-numbers-64/#comment-62523 Thu, 20 Dec 2007 16:36:01 +0000 http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/12/19/tuesdays-numbers-64/#comment-62523 I know Tucker is a conservative, but he's pretty fair and has a great chemistry with his guest (especially the liberal ones). Countdown has to find a better sub when Olbermann is off, Alison seems to be getting worse. It was wierd to watch her eyes reading the teleprompter. Her extreme facial expressions drive me nuts (just like Shuster). I know Tucker is a conservative, but he’s pretty fair and has a great chemistry with his guest (especially the liberal ones).

Countdown has to find a better sub when Olbermann is off, Alison seems to be getting worse. It was wierd to watch her eyes reading the teleprompter. Her extreme facial expressions drive me nuts (just like Shuster).

]]> by: Aaron http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/12/19/tuesdays-numbers-64/#comment-62517 Thu, 20 Dec 2007 15:25:11 +0000 http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/12/19/tuesdays-numbers-64/#comment-62517 Remember, catch >Tucker with Tucker Carlson M-F @ 6 et. Remember, catch >Tucker with Tucker Carlson M-F @ 6 et.

]]> by: elmonica http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/12/19/tuesdays-numbers-64/#comment-62504 Thu, 20 Dec 2007 14:20:23 +0000 http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/12/19/tuesdays-numbers-64/#comment-62504 Cancel that Tucker hole so he can go work at Fox. I have no problem with show being on MSNBC but it is clear that conservatives won't turn consistently for a network that isn't 100% dedicated to their ideology 24 hours a day. What a pathetic way to have to earn somebody's loyalty. Cancel that Tucker hole so he can go work at Fox. I have no problem with show being on MSNBC but it is clear that conservatives won’t turn consistently for a network that isn’t 100% dedicated to their ideology 24 hours a day. What a pathetic way to have to earn somebody’s loyalty.

]]> by: Cella http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/12/19/tuesdays-numbers-64/#comment-62496 Thu, 20 Dec 2007 13:11:08 +0000 http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/12/19/tuesdays-numbers-64/#comment-62496 Tucker's numbers keep inching up. I think the stir about the cancellation of his show has helped! I have noticed this trend. Tucker’s numbers keep inching up.
I think the stir about the cancellation of his show has helped!
I have noticed this trend.

]]> by: StephenMartin http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/12/19/tuesdays-numbers-64/#comment-62455 Wed, 19 Dec 2007 23:45:17 +0000 http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/12/19/tuesdays-numbers-64/#comment-62455 tucker is the best MSNBC has to offer. tucker is the best MSNBC has to offer.

]]> by: Aaron http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/12/19/tuesdays-numbers-64/#comment-62453 Wed, 19 Dec 2007 23:40:58 +0000 http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/12/19/tuesdays-numbers-64/#comment-62453 Nice night for >Tucker. Nice night for >Tucker.

]]> by: Steve http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/12/19/tuesdays-numbers-64/#comment-62449 Wed, 19 Dec 2007 23:15:49 +0000 http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/12/19/tuesdays-numbers-64/#comment-62449 Susan Hendricks does a capable job filling in, not spectacular, but competent for the role. I'm surprised the show gets any sort of ratings whatsoever what with all the repeated content in the 6pm hour. Is it really that hard to stay live for two hours? Susan Hendricks does a capable job filling in, not spectacular, but competent for the role.

I’m surprised the show gets any sort of ratings whatsoever what with all the repeated content in the 6pm hour. Is it really that hard to stay live for two hours?

]]> by: Anonymous http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/12/19/tuesdays-numbers-64/#comment-62442 Wed, 19 Dec 2007 21:26:26 +0000 http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/12/19/tuesdays-numbers-64/#comment-62442 I think Susan's a delight, and Erica is extremely overrated. I've been glad to see she hasn't been on AC360 for the past week or so...Gary and Randi do a MUCH better job with the banter. I think Susan’s a delight, and Erica is extremely overrated. I’ve been glad to see she hasn’t been on AC360 for the past week or so…Gary and Randi do a MUCH better job with the banter.

]]> by: Terance http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/12/19/tuesdays-numbers-64/#comment-62436 Wed, 19 Dec 2007 20:36:32 +0000 http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/12/19/tuesdays-numbers-64/#comment-62436 Susan, I'm just not INTO you. Alright, I'll explain. See, I get this "Prime News" newsletter M-F.. and the last couple days when I read Susan Hendricks was filling in, I avoided her like salmonella. So, don't think the great Erica pulled in 44K in the all important demo for one minute! Oh, and HLN, do what I said and only use the sultry Richelle Carey for fill-in duty. Susan, I’m just not INTO you. Alright, I’ll explain. See, I get this “Prime News” newsletter M-F.. and the last couple days when I read Susan Hendricks was filling in, I avoided her like salmonella. So, don’t think the great Erica pulled in 44K in the all important demo for one minute! Oh, and HLN, do what I said and only use the sultry Richelle Carey for fill-in duty.

]]>