<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/1.5.1-alpha" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Thursday&#8217;s Numbers&#8230;</title>
	<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2008/01/05/thursdays-numbers-72/</link>
	<description>Unvarnished news &#038; opinion on cable news</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 06 Dec 2009 23:31:07 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=1.5.1-alpha</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: carrie elkin</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2008/01/05/thursdays-numbers-72/#comment-64031</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 16:26:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2008/01/05/thursdays-numbers-72/#comment-64031</guid>
					<description>#4, I agree with you about KO, but I feel likewise about BO...I think we need some new fresh faces with new schticks....both of those clowns are wearing me out!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>#4, I agree with you about KO, but I feel likewise about BO&#8230;I think we need some new fresh faces with new schticks&#8230;.both of those clowns are wearing me out!!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Tim</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2008/01/05/thursdays-numbers-72/#comment-63677</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jan 2008 19:28:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2008/01/05/thursdays-numbers-72/#comment-63677</guid>
					<description>Here is my comment, Keith Obermann is a jackass, maybe if he would spend more time talking about the news, and not about Fox, he might, but I doubt, do a little bit better, he knows what that little bitty means....GET RID OF HIM...HES A JOKE</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Here is my comment, Keith Obermann is a jackass, maybe if he would spend more time talking about the news, and not about Fox, he might, but I doubt, do a little bit better, he knows what that little bitty means&#8230;.GET RID OF HIM&#8230;HES A JOKE
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2008/01/05/thursdays-numbers-72/#comment-63605</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jan 2008 16:26:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2008/01/05/thursdays-numbers-72/#comment-63605</guid>
					<description>Wow!  The 10/11pm CNN demo figures are impressive.  I wonder if Super Tuesday will see similar numbers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Wow!  The 10/11pm CNN demo figures are impressive.  I wonder if Super Tuesday will see similar numbers.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Ira</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2008/01/05/thursdays-numbers-72/#comment-63587</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jan 2008 15:40:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2008/01/05/thursdays-numbers-72/#comment-63587</guid>
					<description>Spud:  A slight typo:  you are showing P25-54 for both columns at 12AM and 1AM.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Spud:  A slight typo:  you are showing P25-54 for both columns at 12AM and 1AM.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: untitled</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2008/01/05/thursdays-numbers-72/#comment-63575</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jan 2008 13:46:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2008/01/05/thursdays-numbers-72/#comment-63575</guid>
					<description>CNN's coverage was terrible, but they seem to get the highest numbers. I watched MS-NBC, I'm a glutton for punishment. Tweety was a hoot! Olbermann took a few lumps from the rest, that was enjoyable to watch.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>CNN&#8217;s coverage was terrible, but they seem to get the highest numbers. I watched MS-NBC, I&#8217;m a glutton for punishment. Tweety was a hoot! Olbermann took a few lumps from the rest, that was enjoyable to watch.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
