<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/1.5.1-alpha" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Olbermann vs. FNC: Uh-oh&#8230;</title>
	<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2008/01/10/olbermann-vs-fnc-uh-oh/</link>
	<description>Unvarnished news &#038; opinion on cable news</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 06 Dec 2009 05:38:19 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=1.5.1-alpha</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Tom P</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2008/01/10/olbermann-vs-fnc-uh-oh/#comment-64148</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2008 18:35:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2008/01/10/olbermann-vs-fnc-uh-oh/#comment-64148</guid>
					<description>The trouble is that he is just an idiot who doesnt know any better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>The trouble is that he is just an idiot who doesnt know any better.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Nick D.</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2008/01/10/olbermann-vs-fnc-uh-oh/#comment-64145</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2008 18:05:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2008/01/10/olbermann-vs-fnc-uh-oh/#comment-64145</guid>
					<description>Alison....you are so right it hurts!

Olbermann to news is Etch-A-Sketch is to art.....
only the Etch-A-Sketch is a quality product...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Alison&#8230;.you are so right it hurts!</p>
	<p>Olbermann to news is Etch-A-Sketch is to art&#8230;..<br />
only the Etch-A-Sketch is a quality product&#8230;
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: William</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2008/01/10/olbermann-vs-fnc-uh-oh/#comment-64135</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2008 15:50:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2008/01/10/olbermann-vs-fnc-uh-oh/#comment-64135</guid>
					<description>What is worrisome is that both Olbermann and his employer claim that he is, in fact, a real news person.  It says volumes about MSNBC that he was one of their lead &quot;anchors&quot; during the New Hampshire primary.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>What is worrisome is that both Olbermann and his employer claim that he is, in fact, a real news person.  It says volumes about MSNBC that he was one of their lead &#8220;anchors&#8221; during the New Hampshire primary.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Kirk G</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2008/01/10/olbermann-vs-fnc-uh-oh/#comment-64124</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2008 13:18:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2008/01/10/olbermann-vs-fnc-uh-oh/#comment-64124</guid>
					<description>What is worrisom is that some think Olbermann is a news person.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>What is worrisom is that some think Olbermann is a news person.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Alison</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2008/01/10/olbermann-vs-fnc-uh-oh/#comment-64122</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2008 12:24:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2008/01/10/olbermann-vs-fnc-uh-oh/#comment-64122</guid>
					<description>I used to be a fan. No more. His obsession with Fox and his willigness to twist, bend, distort or as in this case, flat out lie to pander to fit his own personal agendas disgusts me. If he had one iota of class at all (which he doesn't), he'd apologize for this. But he won't. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I used to be a fan. No more. His obsession with Fox and his willigness to twist, bend, distort or as in this case, flat out lie to pander to fit his own personal agendas disgusts me. If he had one iota of class at all (which he doesn&#8217;t), he&#8217;d apologize for this. But he won&#8217;t.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Missy</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2008/01/10/olbermann-vs-fnc-uh-oh/#comment-64121</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2008 12:21:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2008/01/10/olbermann-vs-fnc-uh-oh/#comment-64121</guid>
					<description>J$, great job of editing.  And I love that music - very accusatory toward KO!

And &quot;joe&quot;(#4), you are wrong.  While some of us may have watched Keith's program at some point, it sounds like we're all now pretty disgusted with him and his tactics and just comment on things we see here and at other places on the web.  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>J$, great job of editing.  And I love that music - very accusatory toward KO!</p>
	<p>And &#8220;joe&#8221;(#4), you are wrong.  While some of us may have watched Keith&#8217;s program at some point, it sounds like we&#8217;re all now pretty disgusted with him and his tactics and just comment on things we see here and at other places on the web.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: johnny dollar</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2008/01/10/olbermann-vs-fnc-uh-oh/#comment-64117</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2008 11:55:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2008/01/10/olbermann-vs-fnc-uh-oh/#comment-64117</guid>
					<description>Dan Abrams did a segment on this after Olbermann's show. What's unintentionally hilarious about it is that he ran a whole bunch of clips of Garrett noting the denials, talking about the emails with Begala, etc.--all stuff that just minutes earlier Olbermann claimed never happened!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Dan Abrams did a segment on this after Olbermann&#8217;s show. What&#8217;s unintentionally hilarious about it is that he ran a whole bunch of clips of Garrett noting the denials, talking about the emails with Begala, etc.&#8211;all stuff that just minutes earlier Olbermann claimed never happened!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: RJ</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2008/01/10/olbermann-vs-fnc-uh-oh/#comment-64114</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2008 11:36:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2008/01/10/olbermann-vs-fnc-uh-oh/#comment-64114</guid>
					<description>http://www.huffingtonpost.com/paul-begala/fox-news-we-report-e_b_80698.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p><a >http://www.huffingtonpost.com/paul-begala/fox-news-we-report-e_b_80698.html</a>
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: ImNotBlue</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2008/01/10/olbermann-vs-fnc-uh-oh/#comment-64108</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2008 10:58:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2008/01/10/olbermann-vs-fnc-uh-oh/#comment-64108</guid>
					<description>Aw... boo on Spud for removing OW.

Clicking there was so much easier than hitting it up in my bookmark menu.  Thanks a lot, Spud.  You've cost me 1.5 seconds daily... AND I'LL NEVER GET THOSE BACK!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Aw&#8230; boo on Spud for removing OW.</p>
	<p>Clicking there was so much easier than hitting it up in my bookmark menu.  Thanks a lot, Spud.  You&#8217;ve cost me 1.5 seconds daily&#8230; AND I&#8217;LL NEVER GET THOSE BACK!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Spud</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2008/01/10/olbermann-vs-fnc-uh-oh/#comment-64106</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2008 10:44:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2008/01/10/olbermann-vs-fnc-uh-oh/#comment-64106</guid>
					<description>You already link to both J$ and Olbermann Watch. What’s new? 

I like to $ because it's principally an FNC fan site. But you're right about OW. That doesn't fit in with the rest of the blogroll, which has evolved considerably since I first added that link. It has been removed. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>You already link to both J$ and Olbermann Watch. What’s new? </p>
	<p>I like to $ because it&#8217;s principally an FNC fan site. But you&#8217;re right about OW. That doesn&#8217;t fit in with the rest of the blogroll, which has evolved considerably since I first added that link. It has been removed.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Kris</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2008/01/10/olbermann-vs-fnc-uh-oh/#comment-64103</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2008 10:22:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2008/01/10/olbermann-vs-fnc-uh-oh/#comment-64103</guid>
					<description>Gee, Keith o. caugth in yet another lie...no surprise. He never learns...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Gee, Keith o. caugth in yet another lie&#8230;no surprise. He never learns&#8230;
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Mike Beckham</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2008/01/10/olbermann-vs-fnc-uh-oh/#comment-64101</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2008 10:19:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2008/01/10/olbermann-vs-fnc-uh-oh/#comment-64101</guid>
					<description>You already link to both J$ and Olbermann Watch. What's new?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>You already link to both J$ and Olbermann Watch. What&#8217;s new?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: joe</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2008/01/10/olbermann-vs-fnc-uh-oh/#comment-64098</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2008 09:53:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2008/01/10/olbermann-vs-fnc-uh-oh/#comment-64098</guid>
					<description>Well Bill that &quot;type of audience&quot; would include you.. anytime olbermann causes a stir you all flock to his show to see what else this idiot will say...

thats same type of audience that watches bor for his controversial (over the top then olbermann) fatwa</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Well Bill that &#8220;type of audience&#8221; would include you.. anytime olbermann causes a stir you all flock to his show to see what else this idiot will say&#8230;</p>
	<p>thats same type of audience that watches bor for his controversial (over the top then olbermann) fatwa
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: mlong</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2008/01/10/olbermann-vs-fnc-uh-oh/#comment-64095</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2008 09:27:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2008/01/10/olbermann-vs-fnc-uh-oh/#comment-64095</guid>
					<description>This wouldn't be a big deal if it was the first time this has happen...but it isn't KO has done this many times..and if he corrects it and admit his error it usually follows a cheap shot at the party he lied about IE: Rudy Giuliani.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>This wouldn&#8217;t be a big deal if it was the first time this has happen&#8230;but it isn&#8217;t KO has done this many times..and if he corrects it and admit his error it usually follows a cheap shot at the party he lied about IE: Rudy Giuliani.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Bill</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2008/01/10/olbermann-vs-fnc-uh-oh/#comment-64091</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2008 09:20:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2008/01/10/olbermann-vs-fnc-uh-oh/#comment-64091</guid>
					<description>He's already a rat in Olbermann skin. This guy is so low class and without integrity. I don't know why anyone watches him or pays attention to him. 
MSNBC only keeps him on because it is the ONLY show they have that gets some type of audience.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>He&#8217;s already a rat in Olbermann skin. This guy is so low class and without integrity. I don&#8217;t know why anyone watches him or pays attention to him.<br />
MSNBC only keeps him on because it is the ONLY show they have that gets some type of audience.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Cella</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2008/01/10/olbermann-vs-fnc-uh-oh/#comment-64090</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2008 09:17:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2008/01/10/olbermann-vs-fnc-uh-oh/#comment-64090</guid>
					<description>When is MSNBC going to turn back into a pumpkin?
And Keith Olbermann back into a rat?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>When is MSNBC going to turn back into a pumpkin?<br />
And Keith Olbermann back into a rat?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
