<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/1.5.1-alpha" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: He said it: Update&#8230;</title>
	<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2008/01/16/he-said-it-update/</link>
	<description>Unvarnished news &#038; opinion on cable news</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 07:47:24 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=1.5.1-alpha</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Women ED Hardy</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2008/01/16/he-said-it-update/#comment-68710</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Apr 2010 03:51:22 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2008/01/16/he-said-it-update/#comment-68710</guid>
					<description>I really like this blog. Please continue the great work. Regards!!!
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I really like this blog. Please continue the great work. Regards!!!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Women ED Hardy</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2008/01/16/he-said-it-update/#comment-68709</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Apr 2010 03:50:40 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2008/01/16/he-said-it-update/#comment-68709</guid>
					<description>I really like this style.[url=http://www.ed-stores.com]Women ED Hardy[/url]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I really like this style.[url=http://www.ed-stores.com]Women ED Hardy[/url]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Women ED Hardy</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2008/01/16/he-said-it-update/#comment-68708</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Apr 2010 03:49:54 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2008/01/16/he-said-it-update/#comment-68708</guid>
					<description>I really like this style.[url=http://www.ed-stores.com]Women ED Hardy[/url]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I really like this style.[url=http://www.ed-stores.com]Women ED Hardy[/url]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: ed hardy</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2008/01/16/he-said-it-update/#comment-68484</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 04:29:31 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2008/01/16/he-said-it-update/#comment-68484</guid>
					<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.edhardy-zone.com/Ed-Hardy-Swimwear/ED-Hardy-Women's-one-piece-swim-

suit.html&quot;&gt;ed hardy women's one piece swim suit&lt;/a&gt; 
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ed-hardy.cc/ed-hardy-men-apparel/ed-hardy-t-shirts.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;ed hardy t-

shirts&lt;/a&gt;  
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ed-hardy.cc/ed-hardy-clothing/Ed-Hardy-Women-clothing.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;ed hardy 

women clothing&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.edhardy-zone.com/Ed-Hardy-Underwear.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;ed hardy underwear&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ed-hardy.cc/ed-hardy-men-apparel/ed-hardy-underwear-loungewear.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;ed 

hardy underwear loungewear&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.edhardy-zone.com/Ed-Hardy-Underwear/Ed-Hardy-Men-Underwear.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;ed 

hardy men underwear&lt;/a&gt; </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p><a href="http://insidecable.blogsome.com/go.php?u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.edhardy-zone.com%2FEd-Hardy-Swimwear%2FED-Hardy-Women%27s-one-piece-swim-%0D%0A%0D%0Asuit.html&amp;i=0&amp;c=a2ad8c2f3348f3d7ea6608f520b80205e33ba3ed">ed hardy women&#8217;s one piece swim suit</a><br />
<a href="http://www.ed-hardy.cc/ed-hardy-men-apparel/ed-hardy-t-shirts.html" rel="nofollow">ed hardy t-</p>
	<p>shirts</a><br />
<a href="http://www.ed-hardy.cc/ed-hardy-clothing/Ed-Hardy-Women-clothing.html" rel="nofollow">ed hardy </p>
	<p>women clothing</a><br />
<a href="http://insidecable.blogsome.com/go.php?u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.edhardy-zone.com%2FEd-Hardy-Underwear.html&amp;i=0&amp;c=697001f966af803ff34613acb4641a85add08057" rel="nofollow">ed hardy underwear</a><br />
<a href="http://www.ed-hardy.cc/ed-hardy-men-apparel/ed-hardy-underwear-loungewear.html" rel="nofollow">ed </p>
	<p>hardy underwear loungewear</a><br />
<a href="http://www.edhardy-zone.com/Ed-Hardy-Underwear/Ed-Hardy-Men-Underwear.html" rel="nofollow">ed </p>
	<p>hardy men underwear</a>
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Aaron</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2008/01/16/he-said-it-update/#comment-64659</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2008 20:53:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2008/01/16/he-said-it-update/#comment-64659</guid>
					<description>#16 Ira.  They will need a sizable potential audience and a talent shakeup.  Let's face it Liz Claman is a good start but Dave Ramsey is as exciting as starting at the floor in the elevator for 6 hours.  Asman is boring and cheesy.  Happy Hour does have potential.  Also, I am not a fan of Glick/Barnes but a Barnes-less MFB has more potential than MFB w/ him.  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>#16 Ira.  They will need a sizable potential audience and a talent shakeup.  Let&#8217;s face it Liz Claman is a good start but Dave Ramsey is as exciting as starting at the floor in the elevator for 6 hours.  Asman is boring and cheesy.  Happy Hour does have potential.  Also, I am not a fan of Glick/Barnes but a Barnes-less MFB has more potential than MFB w/ him.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Haile Welde</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2008/01/16/he-said-it-update/#comment-64581</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2008 20:56:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2008/01/16/he-said-it-update/#comment-64581</guid>
					<description>This &quot;Oh, I'm so shocked a new network (FBN) has 6,000 viewers!&quot; is extremely disingenuous.

1) That's around the ratings FOX News was getting at the end of it's first year! It's only been a few weeks for FBN.

2) On top of that, FBN has a far smaller niche audience to draw from than did FOX News.

3) As Ira stated, they have a tiny percentage of CNBC's distribution at this stage. That will expand exponentially over the years, also helped by News Corp.'s acquisition of The Wall Street Journal, Barron's, MarketWatch, etc.

4) FOX News _ALREADY_ has the 5 top rated business shows on cable! How convenient for those ultra-liberal reporters to poo-poo FBN's ratings, and conveniently 'forget' to mention this in their reporting.

5) FOX executives have shown with FNC that their strategy is in evolving things to perfection, not pre-perfecting shows before putting them on the air.

So I hope someone is saving all these articles and posts trashing FBN, because in a couple of years, they'll ALL change their tune to blaming it's high ratings on &quot;low-IQ business viewers&quot;, or &quot;conservative moneymen&quot; watching religiously, or FBN &quot;taking the easy route&quot; and stoop to people's base natures and using sex to sell business news by flaunting all the 'come-hitherly women'.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>This &#8220;Oh, I&#8217;m so shocked a new network (FBN) has 6,000 viewers!&#8221; is extremely disingenuous.</p>
	<p>1) That&#8217;s around the ratings FOX News was getting at the end of it&#8217;s first year! It&#8217;s only been a few weeks for FBN.</p>
	<p>2) On top of that, FBN has a far smaller niche audience to draw from than did FOX News.</p>
	<p>3) As Ira stated, they have a tiny percentage of CNBC&#8217;s distribution at this stage. That will expand exponentially over the years, also helped by News Corp.&#8217;s acquisition of The Wall Street Journal, Barron&#8217;s, MarketWatch, etc.</p>
	<p>4) FOX News _ALREADY_ has the 5 top rated business shows on cable! How convenient for those ultra-liberal reporters to poo-poo FBN&#8217;s ratings, and conveniently &#8216;forget&#8217; to mention this in their reporting.</p>
	<p>5) FOX executives have shown with FNC that their strategy is in evolving things to perfection, not pre-perfecting shows before putting them on the air.</p>
	<p>So I hope someone is saving all these articles and posts trashing FBN, because in a couple of years, they&#8217;ll ALL change their tune to blaming it&#8217;s high ratings on &#8220;low-IQ business viewers&#8221;, or &#8220;conservative moneymen&#8221; watching religiously, or FBN &#8220;taking the easy route&#8221; and stoop to people&#8217;s base natures and using sex to sell business news by flaunting all the &#8216;come-hitherly women&#8217;.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Terance</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2008/01/16/he-said-it-update/#comment-64579</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2008 20:10:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2008/01/16/he-said-it-update/#comment-64579</guid>
					<description>Thanks, Lurker. Btw, that picture of Cavuto on the right hand side looks like one of those &quot;shots&quot; FNC/FBN include when providing ratings charts/graphs for other channels. Let me know if you find any other blogs. I would be interested in Dagyn, Shibani or Jenna.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Thanks, Lurker. Btw, that picture of Cavuto on the right hand side looks like one of those &#8220;shots&#8221; FNC/FBN include when providing ratings charts/graphs for other channels. Let me know if you find any other blogs. I would be interested in Dagyn, Shibani or Jenna.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Ira</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2008/01/16/he-said-it-update/#comment-64577</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2008 19:45:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2008/01/16/he-said-it-update/#comment-64577</guid>
					<description>&lt;i&gt;FBN need s a major talent shake up if it wants to get to even 20,000 viewers&lt;/i&gt;

Aaron: What FBN needs is to get into more homes.  As has been discussed here (and obviously ignored by you), until they broke the Comcast glass ceiling last week, they were probably in less than 10 million homes, about 10% of the CNBC reach.

Lurker: Actually, I like &quot;Happy Hour.&quot;  Sure it needs some work but it has definite potential.  

Otherwise, I find it tough getting used to the slower pace and longer segments than what FNC offers.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p><i>FBN need s a major talent shake up if it wants to get to even 20,000 viewers</i></p>
	<p>Aaron: What FBN needs is to get into more homes.  As has been discussed here (and obviously ignored by you), until they broke the Comcast glass ceiling last week, they were probably in less than 10 million homes, about 10% of the CNBC reach.</p>
	<p>Lurker: Actually, I like &#8220;Happy Hour.&#8221;  Sure it needs some work but it has definite potential.  </p>
	<p>Otherwise, I find it tough getting used to the slower pace and longer segments than what FNC offers.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Lurker</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2008/01/16/he-said-it-update/#comment-64574</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2008 19:39:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2008/01/16/he-said-it-update/#comment-64574</guid>
					<description>Hahaha, you always get that when Peter Schiff and Mike Norman is in the house. 


Oh yea, You were talking about FBN blogs awhile back?

I found Cheryl Casone's by accident

Seems they might all be blogging but they're not setup yet except maybe Cheryl? Her's is probably not suppose to be live yet? cause you can't find her blog going through the site.


http://casone.blogs.foxbusiness.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Hahaha, you always get that when Peter Schiff and Mike Norman is in the house. </p>
	<p>Oh yea, You were talking about FBN blogs awhile back?</p>
	<p>I found Cheryl Casone&#8217;s by accident</p>
	<p>Seems they might all be blogging but they&#8217;re not setup yet except maybe Cheryl? Her&#8217;s is probably not suppose to be live yet? cause you can&#8217;t find her blog going through the site.</p>
	<p><a >http://casone.blogs.foxbusiness.com</a>
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Terance</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2008/01/16/he-said-it-update/#comment-64567</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2008 19:22:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2008/01/16/he-said-it-update/#comment-64567</guid>
					<description>Lurker, I don't like how Asman always seems to have a goofy smug grin on his face.. I might agree with some of his politics too. But, I'm not on a biz channel for that crap. Btw, did you see him lose total control today? There was something like four people yelling at each other and it took him a while to get things under control.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Lurker, I don&#8217;t like how Asman always seems to have a goofy smug grin on his face.. I might agree with some of his politics too. But, I&#8217;m not on a biz channel for that crap. Btw, did you see him lose total control today? There was something like four people yelling at each other and it took him a while to get things under control.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Lurker</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2008/01/16/he-said-it-update/#comment-64559</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2008 18:47:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2008/01/16/he-said-it-update/#comment-64559</guid>
					<description>Huh? I got FBN on the 1st day. TWC NYC. As for Asman and politics. Well yea the 2-5 show has alot of those segments and they mix it with business angles.

I prefer less of it but I can hack it. As for cutting his air time? Since I agree with his politics I like the guy but I would drop his 7 pm show. Him and Liz have a nice chemistry going BUT I think I like Cheryl Casone paired up with Liz better. There are tons of guys as panelists that missing a male co-anchor wouldn't hurt the male/female dynamics that are needed in a show.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Huh? I got FBN on the 1st day. TWC NYC. As for Asman and politics. Well yea the 2-5 show has alot of those segments and they mix it with business angles.</p>
	<p>I prefer less of it but I can hack it. As for cutting his air time? Since I agree with his politics I like the guy but I would drop his 7 pm show. Him and Liz have a nice chemistry going BUT I think I like Cheryl Casone paired up with Liz better. There are tons of guys as panelists that missing a male co-anchor wouldn&#8217;t hurt the male/female dynamics that are needed in a show.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Aaron</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2008/01/16/he-said-it-update/#comment-64558</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2008 18:35:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2008/01/16/he-said-it-update/#comment-64558</guid>
					<description>FBN sucks, Dylan Ratigan is lame, stupid, and sucks.  FBN need s a major talent shake up if it wants to get to even 20,000 viewers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>FBN sucks, Dylan Ratigan is lame, stupid, and sucks.  FBN need s a major talent shake up if it wants to get to even 20,000 viewers.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Al Dugan</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2008/01/16/he-said-it-update/#comment-64557</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2008 18:33:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2008/01/16/he-said-it-update/#comment-64557</guid>
					<description>Who said any of us went to B-School?  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Who said any of us went to B-School?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2008/01/16/he-said-it-update/#comment-64555</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2008 18:22:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2008/01/16/he-said-it-update/#comment-64555</guid>
					<description>I thought Lurker doesn't get FBN...

As for Asman, I really don't like him too much...personally I can do without him.  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I thought Lurker doesn&#8217;t get FBN&#8230;</p>
	<p>As for Asman, I really don&#8217;t like him too much&#8230;personally I can do without him.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Terance</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2008/01/16/he-said-it-update/#comment-64554</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2008 18:17:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2008/01/16/he-said-it-update/#comment-64554</guid>
					<description>Hey Lurker -- I've noticed Asman always tries to bring politics into the equation.. Do you agree? I think he needs to get his airtime cut back to one hour a day max.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Hey Lurker &#8212; I&#8217;ve noticed Asman always tries to bring politics into the equation.. Do you agree? I think he needs to get his airtime cut back to one hour a day max.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Lurker</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2008/01/16/he-said-it-update/#comment-64541</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2008 16:35:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2008/01/16/he-said-it-update/#comment-64541</guid>
					<description>Hmmm... I have a wild prediction

Isn't Eric Bolling's non-compete up soon? Happy Hour was probably one of the hits Fox was counting on based on all the things they've said in the past about the show but when the leaked ratings came out that Magee guy said some of the bright spots were Liz and Dave, Alexis' new show at 9, Dave Ramsey and somewhat Cavuto at 6.

No mention of Happy Hour at all. Poor #'s? Maybe Fox will have a new show headed up by Bolling that is similar to Fast Money and put it head to head with it at 5. Bolling was by far the fan favorite on that show.

Drop David Asman's show at 7, 4 hours of him is too much and put Happy Hour at the new 7 timeslot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Hmmm&#8230; I have a wild prediction</p>
	<p>Isn&#8217;t Eric Bolling&#8217;s non-compete up soon? Happy Hour was probably one of the hits Fox was counting on based on all the things they&#8217;ve said in the past about the show but when the leaked ratings came out that Magee guy said some of the bright spots were Liz and Dave, Alexis&#8217; new show at 9, Dave Ramsey and somewhat Cavuto at 6.</p>
	<p>No mention of Happy Hour at all. Poor #&#8217;s? Maybe Fox will have a new show headed up by Bolling that is similar to Fast Money and put it head to head with it at 5. Bolling was by far the fan favorite on that show.</p>
	<p>Drop David Asman&#8217;s show at 7, 4 hours of him is too much and put Happy Hour at the new 7 timeslot.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Lurker</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2008/01/16/he-said-it-update/#comment-64538</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2008 16:10:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2008/01/16/he-said-it-update/#comment-64538</guid>
					<description>Some spokeperson probably gave some #'s to a powerpoint/graphic artist guy working there and told him to whip something up. Bam, a 5 minute job to piss off CNBC.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Some spokeperson probably gave some #&#8217;s to a powerpoint/graphic artist guy working there and told him to whip something up. Bam, a 5 minute job to piss off CNBC.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Arthur</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2008/01/16/he-said-it-update/#comment-64527</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2008 14:18:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2008/01/16/he-said-it-update/#comment-64527</guid>
					<description>&lt;i&gt;the slides are pretty blah but I always get a kick out of the pics they use…&lt;/i&gt;

And for this, they went to B-school? They remind me of catty fifteen-year-olds on MySpace.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p><i>the slides are pretty blah but I always get a kick out of the pics they use…</i></p>
	<p>And for this, they went to B-school? They remind me of catty fifteen-year-olds on MySpace.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Terance</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2008/01/16/he-said-it-update/#comment-64521</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2008 13:23:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2008/01/16/he-said-it-update/#comment-64521</guid>
					<description>Dylan Ratigan is lame. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Dylan Ratigan is lame.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2008/01/16/he-said-it-update/#comment-64519</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2008 13:19:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2008/01/16/he-said-it-update/#comment-64519</guid>
					<description>Arthur, the slides are pretty blah but I always get a kick out of the pics they use...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Arthur, the slides are pretty blah but I always get a kick out of the pics they use&#8230;
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Lurker</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2008/01/16/he-said-it-update/#comment-64518</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2008 13:13:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2008/01/16/he-said-it-update/#comment-64518</guid>
					<description>Fast Money sucks. They lost two of the best guys there. That guy with that great hair lol, Tim Strazzini and Eric Bolling who was the presence of the show.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Fast Money sucks. They lost two of the best guys there. That guy with that great hair lol, Tim Strazzini and Eric Bolling who was the presence of the show.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Arthur</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2008/01/16/he-said-it-update/#comment-64516</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2008 13:11:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2008/01/16/he-said-it-update/#comment-64516</guid>
					<description>Does anyone else get a laugh out of picturing these 'network executives' sitting around producing powerpoint slides to prove how wonderful they are? </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Does anyone else get a laugh out of picturing these &#8216;network executives&#8217; sitting around producing powerpoint slides to prove how wonderful they are?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2008/01/16/he-said-it-update/#comment-64515</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2008 13:02:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2008/01/16/he-said-it-update/#comment-64515</guid>
					<description>I don't understand how Fox can be laughing at CNBC's ratings when they average SIX THOUSAND VIEWERS.  

And I wouldn't be taking these ratings at face value...don't forget FM airs at 5pm AND 8pm, while K&amp;amp;C only aired (and still airs) once.  According to CNBC's releases, FM had its best performance in the 8pm timeslot despite the 5pm airing.  Spin away, Fox!  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I don&#8217;t understand how Fox can be laughing at CNBC&#8217;s ratings when they average SIX THOUSAND VIEWERS.  </p>
	<p>And I wouldn&#8217;t be taking these ratings at face value&#8230;don&#8217;t forget FM airs at 5pm AND 8pm, while K&amp;C only aired (and still airs) once.  According to CNBC&#8217;s releases, FM had its best performance in the 8pm timeslot despite the 5pm airing.  Spin away, Fox!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
