<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/1.5.1-alpha" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Olbermann on Lawrence O&#8217;Donnell&#8230;</title>
	<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2008/01/18/olbermann-on-lawrence-odonnell/</link>
	<description>Unvarnished news &#038; opinion on cable news</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 09:51:11 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=1.5.1-alpha</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: ImNotBlue</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2008/01/18/olbermann-on-lawrence-odonnell/#comment-64811</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jan 2008 22:16:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2008/01/18/olbermann-on-lawrence-odonnell/#comment-64811</guid>
					<description>No, he has contempt for conservatives because it's profitable.

Look, the conservative market is pretty heavy with pundits already... and to break into that market would be pretty tough.  So, he jumped on the liberal bandwagon, because there's more room right now.

I don't for a minute believe he actually believes (or understand) what he's saying.  But he knows it's how he can get a little popularity, a little fame... and perhaps in 30 year people will remember his name.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>No, he has contempt for conservatives because it&#8217;s profitable.</p>
	<p>Look, the conservative market is pretty heavy with pundits already&#8230; and to break into that market would be pretty tough.  So, he jumped on the liberal bandwagon, because there&#8217;s more room right now.</p>
	<p>I don&#8217;t for a minute believe he actually believes (or understand) what he&#8217;s saying.  But he knows it&#8217;s how he can get a little popularity, a little fame&#8230; and perhaps in 30 year people will remember his name.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: PLuke</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2008/01/18/olbermann-on-lawrence-odonnell/#comment-64808</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jan 2008 22:12:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2008/01/18/olbermann-on-lawrence-odonnell/#comment-64808</guid>
					<description>He has contempt for Conservatives.  Why?  Because they were the Athletes and he was the nerdy guy talking about them.  He's held that hatred his entire life.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>He has contempt for Conservatives.  Why?  Because they were the Athletes and he was the nerdy guy talking about them.  He&#8217;s held that hatred his entire life.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Char</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2008/01/18/olbermann-on-lawrence-odonnell/#comment-64801</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jan 2008 21:47:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2008/01/18/olbermann-on-lawrence-odonnell/#comment-64801</guid>
					<description>I don't understand why he did not post the information at his own site rather than Kos.  Writing a diary at a partisan blog is dangerous territory, and doing it several times and also  commenting on other writers' diaries is proof that he had thought through the consequences, tossing credibility aside.  Not a great move, in my opinion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I don&#8217;t understand why he did not post the information at his own site rather than Kos.  Writing a diary at a partisan blog is dangerous territory, and doing it several times and also  commenting on other writers&#8217; diaries is proof that he had thought through the consequences, tossing credibility aside.  Not a great move, in my opinion.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: EricH</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2008/01/18/olbermann-on-lawrence-odonnell/#comment-64800</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jan 2008 21:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2008/01/18/olbermann-on-lawrence-odonnell/#comment-64800</guid>
					<description>&quot;He’s not a political person in the sense that he’s not very well informed about politics. &quot;

Yeah, but he knows what Fred Merkle hit in 1907.

And who the third base coach for the Reds in 1950 was.

And he writes so well! He's funny too.

That's good enough to anchor a news program nowadays.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>&#8220;He’s not a political person in the sense that he’s not very well informed about politics. &#8221;</p>
	<p>Yeah, but he knows what Fred Merkle hit in 1907.</p>
	<p>And who the third base coach for the Reds in 1950 was.</p>
	<p>And he writes so well! He&#8217;s funny too.</p>
	<p>That&#8217;s good enough to anchor a news program nowadays.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Alison</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2008/01/18/olbermann-on-lawrence-odonnell/#comment-64793</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jan 2008 21:16:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2008/01/18/olbermann-on-lawrence-odonnell/#comment-64793</guid>
					<description>He's not a political person in the sense that he's not very well informed about politics. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>He&#8217;s not a political person in the sense that he&#8217;s not very well informed about politics.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: PLuke</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2008/01/18/olbermann-on-lawrence-odonnell/#comment-64786</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jan 2008 20:49:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2008/01/18/olbermann-on-lawrence-odonnell/#comment-64786</guid>
					<description>He's not a &quot;political person&quot;????????  That's all he is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>He&#8217;s not a &#8220;political person&#8221;????????  That&#8217;s all he is.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Tom P</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2008/01/18/olbermann-on-lawrence-odonnell/#comment-64763</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jan 2008 16:08:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2008/01/18/olbermann-on-lawrence-odonnell/#comment-64763</guid>
					<description>The olny people who watch this nut are the KOS idiots.  So of course he cares about them.  If they leave he has no show.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>The olny people who watch this nut are the KOS idiots.  So of course he cares about them.  If they leave he has no show.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Jim</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2008/01/18/olbermann-on-lawrence-odonnell/#comment-64759</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jan 2008 15:02:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2008/01/18/olbermann-on-lawrence-odonnell/#comment-64759</guid>
					<description>As someone so immersed in &quot;fantasy&quot; pastimes, he feels the need to remind everyone he has a girlfriend. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>As someone so immersed in &#8220;fantasy&#8221; pastimes, he feels the need to remind everyone he has a girlfriend.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: untitled</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2008/01/18/olbermann-on-lawrence-odonnell/#comment-64755</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jan 2008 12:54:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2008/01/18/olbermann-on-lawrence-odonnell/#comment-64755</guid>
					<description>I think Mr. Olbermann has an enormous ego that enjoys being fed by the bloggers at the Daily Kos. 1500 comments and counting, all very glowing. Really, who wouldn't want to be told how terrific they are. I think Olbermann was taken aback when Lawrance O'Donnell did not agree with him. Since Olbermann is really not a political person, it makes sense he did not see the Huffington Post piece by O'Donnell. (That fact that his staff didn't see it either says a lot). He should have NEVER apologized, especially to a far left wing blog. He did it twice! He seems to spend more time reading the Daily Kos than his OWN blog. He sure doesn't post anything there, except fantasy baseball. At least baseball season is just aroung the corner. BTW: Why would you tell bloggers your girlfriend knits? </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I think Mr. Olbermann has an enormous ego that enjoys being fed by the bloggers at the Daily Kos. 1500 comments and counting, all very glowing. Really, who wouldn&#8217;t want to be told how terrific they are. I think Olbermann was taken aback when Lawrance O&#8217;Donnell did not agree with him. Since Olbermann is really not a political person, it makes sense he did not see the Huffington Post piece by O&#8217;Donnell. (That fact that his staff didn&#8217;t see it either says a lot). He should have NEVER apologized, especially to a far left wing blog. He did it twice! He seems to spend more time reading the Daily Kos than his OWN blog. He sure doesn&#8217;t post anything there, except fantasy baseball. At least baseball season is just aroung the corner. BTW: Why would you tell bloggers your girlfriend knits?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: PLuke</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2008/01/18/olbermann-on-lawrence-odonnell/#comment-64752</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jan 2008 11:51:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2008/01/18/olbermann-on-lawrence-odonnell/#comment-64752</guid>
					<description>Keith waxes with Bill Moyers about the good old days when journalist did Journalism but he uses Blogger stories almost exclusively in his show.  Now, they're his editors and he goes to their office when he screws up.  He personfies everything Moyers, Rather complain about. This is pathetic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Keith waxes with Bill Moyers about the good old days when journalist did Journalism but he uses Blogger stories almost exclusively in his show.  Now, they&#8217;re his editors and he goes to their office when he screws up.  He personfies everything Moyers, Rather complain about. This is pathetic.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Alison</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2008/01/18/olbermann-on-lawrence-odonnell/#comment-64738</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2008 21:45:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2008/01/18/olbermann-on-lawrence-odonnell/#comment-64738</guid>
					<description>I saw one of Olbermann's diaries at Kos. It seemed primarly a vehicle for him to get effusive praise and adoration from his groupies. And oh yes, to share with us the news that his girlfriend was knitting while he was blogging. The man's ego needs to be fed and the kos blogging does that for him, while ruining every single iota of credibility he might once have had.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I saw one of Olbermann&#8217;s diaries at Kos. It seemed primarly a vehicle for him to get effusive praise and adoration from his groupies. And oh yes, to share with us the news that his girlfriend was knitting while he was blogging. The man&#8217;s ego needs to be fed and the kos blogging does that for him, while ruining every single iota of credibility he might once have had.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Jim</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2008/01/18/olbermann-on-lawrence-odonnell/#comment-64736</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2008 21:23:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2008/01/18/olbermann-on-lawrence-odonnell/#comment-64736</guid>
					<description>&quot;His HuffPo piece was news to me.&quot; - Keith Olbermann

People have been criticizing his news sources for years.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>&#8220;His HuffPo piece was news to me.&#8221; - Keith Olbermann</p>
	<p>People have been criticizing his news sources for years.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: mlong</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2008/01/18/olbermann-on-lawrence-odonnell/#comment-64728</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2008 20:11:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2008/01/18/olbermann-on-lawrence-odonnell/#comment-64728</guid>
					<description>First Chrissy grovels to St.Hill and now KO apologizing for Lawrence O’Donnell remarks about the Silky Pony....MSNBC is more and more showing how much their controlled by the Nutroots leftest Blogs like Kos,Clinton's Media Matters and the DNC.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>First Chrissy grovels to St.Hill and now KO apologizing for Lawrence O’Donnell remarks about the Silky Pony&#8230;.MSNBC is more and more showing how much their controlled by the Nutroots leftest Blogs like Kos,Clinton&#8217;s Media Matters and the DNC.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: EricH</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2008/01/18/olbermann-on-lawrence-odonnell/#comment-64726</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2008 19:18:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2008/01/18/olbermann-on-lawrence-odonnell/#comment-64726</guid>
					<description>&quot;This just keeps getting stranger and stranger. Is Olbermann’s job on KOS to be a blogger, or an apologist?&quot;

Is that a trick question?

More seriously, this reflects the extremely dangerous symbiotic relationship between news organizations and bloggers. And Olbermann and Countdown are the worst practioners of this trend.

Bloggers and blogging can be a useful complement to hard news. But they, in their current incarnation, cannot replace hard news. News organizations that rely on blogs for hard news need to be extra cautious when disseminating the information. 

Olbmerann and the crew at MSNBC throw caution to the wind. They do no hard or original reporting on allegations made by bloggers. They don't check on the stories, they don't contact the subjects being discussed to get their side of the story and they never credit the blog as being the source of the story.

I'm not sure what that is; but journalism it ain't.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>&#8220;This just keeps getting stranger and stranger. Is Olbermann’s job on KOS to be a blogger, or an apologist?&#8221;</p>
	<p>Is that a trick question?</p>
	<p>More seriously, this reflects the extremely dangerous symbiotic relationship between news organizations and bloggers. And Olbermann and Countdown are the worst practioners of this trend.</p>
	<p>Bloggers and blogging can be a useful complement to hard news. But they, in their current incarnation, cannot replace hard news. News organizations that rely on blogs for hard news need to be extra cautious when disseminating the information. </p>
	<p>Olbmerann and the crew at MSNBC throw caution to the wind. They do no hard or original reporting on allegations made by bloggers. They don&#8217;t check on the stories, they don&#8217;t contact the subjects being discussed to get their side of the story and they never credit the blog as being the source of the story.</p>
	<p>I&#8217;m not sure what that is; but journalism it ain&#8217;t.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Missy</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2008/01/18/olbermann-on-lawrence-odonnell/#comment-64724</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2008 19:02:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2008/01/18/olbermann-on-lawrence-odonnell/#comment-64724</guid>
					<description>What?  A spat between the two &quot;O&quot;s?  Who to root for if there's no &quot;good&quot; guy?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>What?  A spat between the two &#8220;O&#8221;s?  Who to root for if there&#8217;s no &#8220;good&#8221; guy?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Goldfish</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2008/01/18/olbermann-on-lawrence-odonnell/#comment-64723</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2008 19:01:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2008/01/18/olbermann-on-lawrence-odonnell/#comment-64723</guid>
					<description>Why is KO apologizing: for having Lawrence O'Donnell on his show after Larry criticized a fellow Democrat? Unbelievable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Why is KO apologizing: for having Lawrence O&#8217;Donnell on his show after Larry criticized a fellow Democrat? Unbelievable.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: ImNotBlue</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2008/01/18/olbermann-on-lawrence-odonnell/#comment-64720</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2008 18:51:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2008/01/18/olbermann-on-lawrence-odonnell/#comment-64720</guid>
					<description>This just keeps getting stranger and stranger.  Is Olbermann's job on KOS to be a blogger, or an apologist?

I know he's only had two posts so far, but they've both been explaining things about the show, and offering apologies or defenses.

This, however, does continue to make one thing perfectly clear... Olbermann's ear is to the KOS, he reacts to what they're saying, and their influence is very VERY strong.  To all those who've denied this in the past (here on this website and elsewhere), how do you explain this?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>This just keeps getting stranger and stranger.  Is Olbermann&#8217;s job on KOS to be a blogger, or an apologist?</p>
	<p>I know he&#8217;s only had two posts so far, but they&#8217;ve both been explaining things about the show, and offering apologies or defenses.</p>
	<p>This, however, does continue to make one thing perfectly clear&#8230; Olbermann&#8217;s ear is to the KOS, he reacts to what they&#8217;re saying, and their influence is very VERY strong.  To all those who&#8217;ve denied this in the past (here on this website and elsewhere), how do you explain this?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
