<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/1.5.1-alpha" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Tuesday&#8217;s Numbers&#8230;</title>
	<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2008/01/24/tuesdays-numbers-67/</link>
	<description>Unvarnished news &#038; opinion on cable news</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 05 Dec 2009 16:15:48 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=1.5.1-alpha</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: eddiebear</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2008/01/24/tuesdays-numbers-67/#comment-65384</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2008 13:06:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2008/01/24/tuesdays-numbers-67/#comment-65384</guid>
					<description>#12:

Good point regarding punch up vs punch down. That's why Olby tries to bait BOR/Limbaugh et al into mentioning his name with all of those crazy comments and antics. The moment one of them responds, KO will use it in an ad or brag about it on KOS.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>#12:</p>
	<p>Good point regarding punch up vs punch down. That&#8217;s why Olby tries to bait BOR/Limbaugh et al into mentioning his name with all of those crazy comments and antics. The moment one of them responds, KO will use it in an ad or brag about it on KOS.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: berberry</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2008/01/24/tuesdays-numbers-67/#comment-65382</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2008 12:54:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2008/01/24/tuesdays-numbers-67/#comment-65382</guid>
					<description>All my life I've gravitated toward lower-rated television programs.  I guess my tastes aren't mainstream. 

I'm a liberal who loves KO and I'd just as soon he remained #2 in the ratings.  I usually enjoy his jabs against O'Reilly, and if he were #1 he'd likely have to stop.  I used to work in radio and I well remember the unwritten rule that you always punch up, never down.  A lower-rated station can gain attention for itself by derisively invoking the name(s) of the top-rated station or its talent (especially if the two stations have a similar format), but the #1 station would be nuts to grant free publicity to its antagonist by responding.  I'm sure the same rule applies to news television.

But if KO is trying to achieve #1, he could certainly take heart that O'Reilly's show had been on the air for some 5 or 6 years before it began to dominate the ratings, if I remember correctly.

And I wouldn't be too excited about Dobbs beating Olbermann in P2+, Kris.  Unless of course you really enjoy those erectile dysfunction adverts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>All my life I&#8217;ve gravitated toward lower-rated television programs.  I guess my tastes aren&#8217;t mainstream. </p>
	<p>I&#8217;m a liberal who loves KO and I&#8217;d just as soon he remained #2 in the ratings.  I usually enjoy his jabs against O&#8217;Reilly, and if he were #1 he&#8217;d likely have to stop.  I used to work in radio and I well remember the unwritten rule that you always punch up, never down.  A lower-rated station can gain attention for itself by derisively invoking the name(s) of the top-rated station or its talent (especially if the two stations have a similar format), but the #1 station would be nuts to grant free publicity to its antagonist by responding.  I&#8217;m sure the same rule applies to news television.</p>
	<p>But if KO is trying to achieve #1, he could certainly take heart that O&#8217;Reilly&#8217;s show had been on the air for some 5 or 6 years before it began to dominate the ratings, if I remember correctly.</p>
	<p>And I wouldn&#8217;t be too excited about Dobbs beating Olbermann in P2+, Kris.  Unless of course you really enjoy those erectile dysfunction adverts.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: untitled</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2008/01/24/tuesdays-numbers-67/#comment-65359</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2008 11:55:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2008/01/24/tuesdays-numbers-67/#comment-65359</guid>
					<description>Maybe the should put Lou Dobbs against Olbermann &amp;amp; O'Reilly more often. He did pretty good tonight.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Maybe the should put Lou Dobbs against Olbermann &amp; O&#8217;Reilly more often. He did pretty good tonight.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: foxmeansbusiness</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2008/01/24/tuesdays-numbers-67/#comment-65346</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2008 11:11:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2008/01/24/tuesdays-numbers-67/#comment-65346</guid>
					<description>Amazing!! Hillary exposed today showing her in a  white house pic with Rezko, the guy she called a slumlord while attacking Obama in last weeks debate.  More amazing is all morning i have been flipping between CNN and  MSNBC and not 1 mention of this. Of course the truth tellers at Fox News have shown it a dozen times or so. http://drudgereport.com/flash1.htm</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Amazing!! Hillary exposed today showing her in a  white house pic with Rezko, the guy she called a slumlord while attacking Obama in last weeks debate.  More amazing is all morning i have been flipping between CNN and  MSNBC and not 1 mention of this. Of course the truth tellers at Fox News have shown it a dozen times or so. <a >http://drudgereport.com/flash1.htm</a>
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Kris</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2008/01/24/tuesdays-numbers-67/#comment-65330</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2008 10:10:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2008/01/24/tuesdays-numbers-67/#comment-65330</guid>
					<description>How sweet is it that Lou Dobbs beat out KO? And KO hasn't beat Bill O'Reilly except in his dreams...hell, he can't even beat Bill when Bill is off!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>How sweet is it that Lou Dobbs beat out KO? And KO hasn&#8217;t beat Bill O&#8217;Reilly except in his dreams&#8230;hell, he can&#8217;t even beat Bill when Bill is off!!!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Christopher</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2008/01/24/tuesdays-numbers-67/#comment-65317</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2008 07:53:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2008/01/24/tuesdays-numbers-67/#comment-65317</guid>
					<description>chase-

Yes, Joe wasn't on Morning Joe on Tuesday. Chris Matthews filled in for him. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>chase-</p>
	<p>Yes, Joe wasn&#8217;t on Morning Joe on Tuesday. Chris Matthews filled in for him.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Paco</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2008/01/24/tuesdays-numbers-67/#comment-65305</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2008 01:02:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2008/01/24/tuesdays-numbers-67/#comment-65305</guid>
					<description>Well I suppose it has to be something driving the news cycle, because it certainitly isn't Iraq.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Well I suppose it has to be something driving the news cycle, because it certainitly isn&#8217;t Iraq.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: J. Vazquez</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2008/01/24/tuesdays-numbers-67/#comment-65298</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2008 00:23:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2008/01/24/tuesdays-numbers-67/#comment-65298</guid>
					<description>What happened to Out in the Open?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>What happened to Out in the Open?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: chase</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2008/01/24/tuesdays-numbers-67/#comment-65287</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2008 23:00:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2008/01/24/tuesdays-numbers-67/#comment-65287</guid>
					<description>I'm not sure it's why, but wasn't Joe not on Morning Joe on tues?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I&#8217;m not sure it&#8217;s why, but wasn&#8217;t Joe not on Morning Joe on tues?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Aaron</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2008/01/24/tuesdays-numbers-67/#comment-65272</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2008 21:12:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2008/01/24/tuesdays-numbers-67/#comment-65272</guid>
					<description>Nice night for Tucker.
Good night for AC 360 vs Greta
Larry King is up there
Heath Ledger really is driving this news cycle then.



&amp;gt;WORLD AFFAIRS
&amp;gt;POLITICS
&amp;gt;OPINIONS
&amp;gt;TUCKER</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Nice night for Tucker.<br />
Good night for AC 360 vs Greta<br />
Larry King is up there<br />
Heath Ledger really is driving this news cycle then.</p>
	<p>&gt;WORLD AFFAIRS<br />
&gt;POLITICS<br />
&gt;OPINIONS<br />
&gt;TUCKER
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: rick</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2008/01/24/tuesdays-numbers-67/#comment-65266</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2008 20:10:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2008/01/24/tuesdays-numbers-67/#comment-65266</guid>
					<description>I see KO edged out Nancy Grace(barely)to stay out of the cellar for the 8pm slot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I see KO edged out Nancy Grace(barely)to stay out of the cellar for the 8pm slot.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Nick D.</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2008/01/24/tuesdays-numbers-67/#comment-65261</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2008 19:38:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2008/01/24/tuesdays-numbers-67/#comment-65261</guid>
					<description>Hey, Keith.....what happened to your boast you were beating O'Reilly???

You're not even visable in a oversized rear view mirror.....

Ain't gonna happen, Bro.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Hey, Keith&#8230;..what happened to your boast you were beating O&#8217;Reilly???</p>
	<p>You&#8217;re not even visable in a oversized rear view mirror&#8230;..</p>
	<p>Ain&#8217;t gonna happen, Bro.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2008/01/24/tuesdays-numbers-67/#comment-65260</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2008 19:36:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2008/01/24/tuesdays-numbers-67/#comment-65260</guid>
					<description>Hey Spud, any luck getting your hands on the CNBC figures?  

Morning Joe is incredibly volitile in the ratings -- on Monday it had 200k plus in the demo alone, Tuesday it was dead last (even below CNBC).  How come?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Hey Spud, any luck getting your hands on the CNBC figures?  </p>
	<p>Morning Joe is incredibly volitile in the ratings &#8212; on Monday it had 200k plus in the demo alone, Tuesday it was dead last (even below CNBC).  How come?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
