<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/1.5.1-alpha" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Thursday&#8217;s Numbers&#8230;</title>
	<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2008/01/25/thursdays-numbers-74/</link>
	<description>Unvarnished news &#038; opinion on cable news</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 06 Dec 2009 23:59:59 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=1.5.1-alpha</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Kris</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2008/01/25/thursdays-numbers-74/#comment-65657</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2008 08:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2008/01/25/thursdays-numbers-74/#comment-65657</guid>
					<description>Maybe MSNBC should ask to host a debate every night of the week. That seems to be the only way that this network can get any decent ratings...and even then, it is never a guarantee.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Maybe MSNBC should ask to host a debate every night of the week. That seems to be the only way that this network can get any decent ratings&#8230;and even then, it is never a guarantee.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: foxmeansbusiness</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2008/01/25/thursdays-numbers-74/#comment-65497</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jan 2008 10:47:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2008/01/25/thursdays-numbers-74/#comment-65497</guid>
					<description>Oreilly beat the MSNBC debate and all of MSNBC viewers came from Oriellys audience.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Oreilly beat the MSNBC debate and all of MSNBC viewers came from Oriellys audience.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Paco</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2008/01/25/thursdays-numbers-74/#comment-65490</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jan 2008 09:27:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2008/01/25/thursdays-numbers-74/#comment-65490</guid>
					<description>So much for Headline News beating MSNBC. The debate was MSNBC's highest rated yet. I wonder how they reacted to Mitt Romney saying &quot;I don't care about the voters!&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>So much for Headline News beating MSNBC. The debate was MSNBC&#8217;s highest rated yet. I wonder how they reacted to Mitt Romney saying &#8220;I don&#8217;t care about the voters!&#8221;
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Jim</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2008/01/25/thursdays-numbers-74/#comment-65470</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jan 2008 02:12:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2008/01/25/thursdays-numbers-74/#comment-65470</guid>
					<description>Judging by the drop-off in the 2nd hour, it looks like most people adjusted their viewing to minimize their Olbermann exposure. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Judging by the drop-off in the 2nd hour, it looks like most people adjusted their viewing to minimize their Olbermann exposure.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Ira</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2008/01/25/thursdays-numbers-74/#comment-65446</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2008 23:19:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2008/01/25/thursdays-numbers-74/#comment-65446</guid>
					<description>Terance:  Grandpa has the correct grand theory!  

It appears that MSNBC retained a greater percentage of the audience for the post-debate wrap than their most recent Dems debate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Terance:  Grandpa has the correct grand theory!  </p>
	<p>It appears that MSNBC retained a greater percentage of the audience for the post-debate wrap than their most recent Dems debate.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Grandpa D</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2008/01/25/thursdays-numbers-74/#comment-65441</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2008 22:31:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2008/01/25/thursdays-numbers-74/#comment-65441</guid>
					<description>&lt;i&gt;I find it crazy how H&amp;amp;C managed to squander 1/2 of BO’s P2+ last night.. &lt;/i&gt;

No need to theorize; they all went over to MSNBC to watch the debate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p><i>I find it crazy how H&amp;C managed to squander 1/2 of BO’s P2+ last night.. </i></p>
	<p>No need to theorize; they all went over to MSNBC to watch the debate.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Terance</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2008/01/25/thursdays-numbers-74/#comment-65436</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2008 20:46:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2008/01/25/thursdays-numbers-74/#comment-65436</guid>
					<description>I find it crazy how H&amp;amp;C managed to squander 1/2 of BO's P2+ last night.. we're talking a net loss of nearly 1.5M viewers. But, I'm sure Ira has a grand theory of where these viewers eyes went.  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I find it crazy how H&amp;C managed to squander 1/2 of BO&#8217;s P2+ last night.. we&#8217;re talking a net loss of nearly 1.5M viewers. But, I&#8217;m sure Ira has a grand theory of where these viewers eyes went.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Tom P</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2008/01/25/thursdays-numbers-74/#comment-65434</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2008 20:28:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2008/01/25/thursdays-numbers-74/#comment-65434</guid>
					<description>Did you ever notice that no matter how well Olby does, Oreilly always manages to beat him by about 2,000,000. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Did you ever notice that no matter how well Olby does, Oreilly always manages to beat him by about 2,000,000.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Aaron</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2008/01/25/thursdays-numbers-74/#comment-65426</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2008 20:15:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2008/01/25/thursdays-numbers-74/#comment-65426</guid>
					<description>Spud, where are the Wednesday numbers?
Huge night for the 8Et hour.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Spud, where are the Wednesday numbers?<br />
Huge night for the 8Et hour.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
