<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/1.5.1-alpha" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Changes coming to Fox News Watch&#8230;</title>
	<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2008/02/07/changes-coming-to-fox-news-watch/</link>
	<description>Unvarnished news &#038; opinion on cable news</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 09:23:35 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=1.5.1-alpha</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: JoAnne</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2008/02/07/changes-coming-to-fox-news-watch/#comment-67673</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 14:27:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2008/02/07/changes-coming-to-fox-news-watch/#comment-67673</guid>
					<description>Sorry to read that Eric Burns was no longer with Fox..I was
wondering what happened...Happened to see E.D. Hill, hosting the show...Although, I like E.D. I don't think she is the right person to fill his shoes.  If I were Fox, I would reconsider and bring him back...He is smart and added humor to the show..Fox, please don't make to many changes or
you will find yourself with low ratings like MSNBC!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Sorry to read that Eric Burns was no longer with Fox..I was<br />
wondering what happened&#8230;Happened to see E.D. Hill, hosting the show&#8230;Although, I like E.D. I don&#8217;t think she is the right person to fill his shoes.  If I were Fox, I would reconsider and bring him back&#8230;He is smart and added humor to the show..Fox, please don&#8217;t make to many changes or<br />
you will find yourself with low ratings like MSNBC!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Mary</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2008/02/07/changes-coming-to-fox-news-watch/#comment-67103</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Feb 2008 19:46:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2008/02/07/changes-coming-to-fox-news-watch/#comment-67103</guid>
					<description>Their problem is that they follow the Beltway Boys...now that's a show worthy of axing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Their problem is that they follow the Beltway Boys&#8230;now that&#8217;s a show worthy of axing.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: DanOregon</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2008/02/07/changes-coming-to-fox-news-watch/#comment-66833</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2008 17:36:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2008/02/07/changes-coming-to-fox-news-watch/#comment-66833</guid>
					<description>I predict shorter skirts and more &quot;Fox Attitude.&quot; Probably the best thing Fox News does or did. One of the few &quot;roundtable&quot; shows where voices weren't raised, and righties and lefties frequently reached a consensus by the end of each segment. Clearly this show needed to be retooled.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I predict shorter skirts and more &#8220;Fox Attitude.&#8221; Probably the best thing Fox News does or did. One of the few &#8220;roundtable&#8221; shows where voices weren&#8217;t raised, and righties and lefties frequently reached a consensus by the end of each segment. Clearly this show needed to be retooled.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: ImNotBlue</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2008/02/07/changes-coming-to-fox-news-watch/#comment-66764</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2008 09:58:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2008/02/07/changes-coming-to-fox-news-watch/#comment-66764</guid>
					<description>I agree with Matt... an hour long program would be much better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I agree with Matt&#8230; an hour long program would be much better.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Terance</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2008/02/07/changes-coming-to-fox-news-watch/#comment-66761</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2008 05:39:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2008/02/07/changes-coming-to-fox-news-watch/#comment-66761</guid>
					<description>I fully agree with Lurker about luscious Linda Vester!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I fully agree with Lurker about luscious Linda Vester!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Mike Beckham</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2008/02/07/changes-coming-to-fox-news-watch/#comment-66760</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2008 05:00:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2008/02/07/changes-coming-to-fox-news-watch/#comment-66760</guid>
					<description>^

Nervous? She did not have a clue what she was speaking about and what is that saying about not throwing stones in glass houses?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>^</p>
	<p>Nervous? She did not have a clue what she was speaking about and what is that saying about not throwing stones in glass houses?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Lurker</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2008/02/07/changes-coming-to-fox-news-watch/#comment-66759</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2008 04:24:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2008/02/07/changes-coming-to-fox-news-watch/#comment-66759</guid>
					<description>^

HAH! Like you've never misspoken before huh? How does this sound? She's doing a segment on BOR for the 1st time, got nervous and got her names mixed up. Nah, In your partisan mind, she's just a Fox bimbo.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>^</p>
	<p>HAH! Like you&#8217;ve never misspoken before huh? How does this sound? She&#8217;s doing a segment on BOR for the 1st time, got nervous and got her names mixed up. Nah, In your partisan mind, she&#8217;s just a Fox bimbo.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Mike Beckham</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2008/02/07/changes-coming-to-fox-news-watch/#comment-66755</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2008 02:38:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2008/02/07/changes-coming-to-fox-news-watch/#comment-66755</guid>
					<description>&amp;gt; Julie Banderas or Gregg Jarrett could do a credible job hosting. I really hope the “new media” panelists won’t be a bunch of 25 year old novices running their mouths. (at the risk of sounding like I am 43 going on 60!)

HAH! Julie thought Peter Jennings retired and didn't die and Gregg was (is) a partisan. No thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>&gt; Julie Banderas or Gregg Jarrett could do a credible job hosting. I really hope the “new media” panelists won’t be a bunch of 25 year old novices running their mouths. (at the risk of sounding like I am 43 going on 60!)</p>
	<p>HAH! Julie thought Peter Jennings retired and didn&#8217;t die and Gregg was (is) a partisan. No thanks!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Matt</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2008/02/07/changes-coming-to-fox-news-watch/#comment-66754</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2008 01:05:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2008/02/07/changes-coming-to-fox-news-watch/#comment-66754</guid>
					<description>I am kind of nervous to see where the show's new direction will lead. If I were in charge, I make the show an hour. It's a great show but it goes by so fast. Bring back viewer e-mail. Some people actually made points. Please keep the show politically balanced with the panelists. Finally, stop changing the time slots. Keep it at 6 or 6:30 p.m.; furthermore, show it more than just once a week. I nominate Jon Scott to take over. He's a good fill-in host!   </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I am kind of nervous to see where the show&#8217;s new direction will lead. If I were in charge, I make the show an hour. It&#8217;s a great show but it goes by so fast. Bring back viewer e-mail. Some people actually made points. Please keep the show politically balanced with the panelists. Finally, stop changing the time slots. Keep it at 6 or 6:30 p.m.; furthermore, show it more than just once a week. I nominate Jon Scott to take over. He&#8217;s a good fill-in host!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: johnny dollar</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2008/02/07/changes-coming-to-fox-news-watch/#comment-66753</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2008 00:52:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2008/02/07/changes-coming-to-fox-news-watch/#comment-66753</guid>
					<description>&amp;gt; I really hope the “new media” panelists won’t be a bunch of 25 year old novices

How odd that just last week Burns made a point to clarify that neither Pinkerton nor Gabler were off the show by noting who was &quot;filling in&quot; for them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>&gt; I really hope the “new media” panelists won’t be a bunch of 25 year old novices</p>
	<p>How odd that just last week Burns made a point to clarify that neither Pinkerton nor Gabler were off the show by noting who was &#8220;filling in&#8221; for them.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Scott</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2008/02/07/changes-coming-to-fox-news-watch/#comment-66752</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2008 00:44:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2008/02/07/changes-coming-to-fox-news-watch/#comment-66752</guid>
					<description>I like Eric Burns and thought he was a good moderator. However, I agree that recently the show seemed irratic with revolving panelists and changing time periods.  Julie Banderas or Gregg Jarrett could do a credible job hosting. I really hope the &quot;new media&quot; panelists won't be a bunch of 25 year old novices running their mouths.  (at the risk of sounding like I am 43 going on 60!)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I like Eric Burns and thought he was a good moderator. However, I agree that recently the show seemed irratic with revolving panelists and changing time periods.  Julie Banderas or Gregg Jarrett could do a credible job hosting. I really hope the &#8220;new media&#8221; panelists won&#8217;t be a bunch of 25 year old novices running their mouths.  (at the risk of sounding like I am 43 going on 60!)
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Charles</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2008/02/07/changes-coming-to-fox-news-watch/#comment-66749</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2008 23:33:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2008/02/07/changes-coming-to-fox-news-watch/#comment-66749</guid>
					<description>Noo! :( He is a terrific personality. And he is a very funny author, too. His (old) book, &quot;News Blues&quot; is a very funny look at the industry. He is a very capable, trustworthy man who does try to play it pretty even across the board. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Noo! :( He is a terrific personality. And he is a very funny author, too. His (old) book, &#8220;News Blues&#8221; is a very funny look at the industry. He is a very capable, trustworthy man who does try to play it pretty even across the board.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Bob</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2008/02/07/changes-coming-to-fox-news-watch/#comment-66738</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2008 20:52:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2008/02/07/changes-coming-to-fox-news-watch/#comment-66738</guid>
					<description>I nominate Uma Pemmaraju for the soon-to-be-vacant post!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I nominate Uma Pemmaraju for the soon-to-be-vacant post!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: randy</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2008/02/07/changes-coming-to-fox-news-watch/#comment-66736</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2008 20:49:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2008/02/07/changes-coming-to-fox-news-watch/#comment-66736</guid>
					<description>They replace the guy who was somewhat fair I see.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>They replace the guy who was somewhat fair I see.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Tom</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2008/02/07/changes-coming-to-fox-news-watch/#comment-66735</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2008 20:41:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2008/02/07/changes-coming-to-fox-news-watch/#comment-66735</guid>
					<description>Let's hope that Julie Banderas (in form-fitting attire) becomes the new host.  If Courtney Friel is still with Fox News, then she wouldn't be too bad either.  I'll watch with the sound off.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Let&#8217;s hope that Julie Banderas (in form-fitting attire) becomes the new host.  If Courtney Friel is still with Fox News, then she wouldn&#8217;t be too bad either.  I&#8217;ll watch with the sound off.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: STP</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2008/02/07/changes-coming-to-fox-news-watch/#comment-66734</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2008 20:24:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2008/02/07/changes-coming-to-fox-news-watch/#comment-66734</guid>
					<description>I'm bummed to hear that there will be no Burns. He did a good job and helped make it my favorite FNC program. Hopefully Burns lands another good gig somewhere. And I hope that the new host FNC hires for the revamped &quot;News Watch&quot; is as fair, low-key and as intelligent as Burns is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I&#8217;m bummed to hear that there will be no Burns. He did a good job and helped make it my favorite FNC program. Hopefully Burns lands another good gig somewhere. And I hope that the new host FNC hires for the revamped &#8220;News Watch&#8221; is as fair, low-key and as intelligent as Burns is.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: ira</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2008/02/07/changes-coming-to-fox-news-watch/#comment-66732</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2008 20:15:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2008/02/07/changes-coming-to-fox-news-watch/#comment-66732</guid>
					<description>Johnny &amp;amp; Blue: For whatever reason, in recent airings, &quot;Fox News Watch&quot; seems to have lost its structure; for example Burns often doesn't even introduce the panel.  And except for Jane, it has seemed like a revolving door of panelists.

Blue:  I also bought Eric's book (on early journalism, not the history of beer!), but in truth it was a tad boring!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Johnny &amp; Blue: For whatever reason, in recent airings, &#8220;Fox News Watch&#8221; seems to have lost its structure; for example Burns often doesn&#8217;t even introduce the panel.  And except for Jane, it has seemed like a revolving door of panelists.</p>
	<p>Blue:  I also bought Eric&#8217;s book (on early journalism, not the history of beer!), but in truth it was a tad boring!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: petchy</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2008/02/07/changes-coming-to-fox-news-watch/#comment-66730</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2008 19:44:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2008/02/07/changes-coming-to-fox-news-watch/#comment-66730</guid>
					<description>I just pray they dump Gabler. I quit watching this show because I could no longer stand his rants.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I just pray they dump Gabler. I quit watching this show because I could no longer stand his rants.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Mike Chimeri</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2008/02/07/changes-coming-to-fox-news-watch/#comment-66729</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2008 19:38:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2008/02/07/changes-coming-to-fox-news-watch/#comment-66729</guid>
					<description>Eric will probably get picked up by either CNN or MSNBC.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Eric will probably get picked up by either CNN or MSNBC.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: newswatcher</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2008/02/07/changes-coming-to-fox-news-watch/#comment-66726</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2008 18:59:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2008/02/07/changes-coming-to-fox-news-watch/#comment-66726</guid>
					<description>AWWW, I'm very disappointed to hear this. I never missed it, it was always recorded on my dvr. I loved hearing the different points of view. Besides Greta, it was the most fair and balanced on the network!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>AWWW, I&#8217;m very disappointed to hear this. I never missed it, it was always recorded on my dvr. I loved hearing the different points of view. Besides Greta, it was the most fair and balanced on the network!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: ImNotBlue</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2008/02/07/changes-coming-to-fox-news-watch/#comment-66725</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2008 18:54:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2008/02/07/changes-coming-to-fox-news-watch/#comment-66725</guid>
					<description>Darn... I liked Burns.  I even bought his book!

http://www.amazon.com/Infamous-Scribblers-Founding-Beginnings-Journalism/dp/B000MV8HMA/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1202428440&amp;amp;sr=8-1

I haven't read it yet, but it does look good on my shelf.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Darn&#8230; I liked Burns.  I even bought his book!</p>
	<p><a >http://www.amazon.com/Infamous-Scribblers-Founding-Beginnings-Journalism/dp/B000MV8HMA/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1?ie=UTF8&amp;s=books&amp;qid=1202428440&amp;sr=8-1</a></p>
	<p>I haven&#8217;t read it yet, but it does look good on my shelf.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Lurker</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2008/02/07/changes-coming-to-fox-news-watch/#comment-66723</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2008 18:51:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2008/02/07/changes-coming-to-fox-news-watch/#comment-66723</guid>
					<description>Linda Vester as host, please please please...

One show a week and she'll have all the time to still be with her kids.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Linda Vester as host, please please please&#8230;</p>
	<p>One show a week and she&#8217;ll have all the time to still be with her kids.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Chris</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2008/02/07/changes-coming-to-fox-news-watch/#comment-66722</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2008 18:49:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2008/02/07/changes-coming-to-fox-news-watch/#comment-66722</guid>
					<description>Missy, the format kind of has been worsening in recent months with them moving away from the quick hits and kind of focusing on some stupid element for the last 2 minute segment. Still, a big surprise in my own opinion, but eh, I guess times move on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Missy, the format kind of has been worsening in recent months with them moving away from the quick hits and kind of focusing on some stupid element for the last 2 minute segment. Still, a big surprise in my own opinion, but eh, I guess times move on.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Terance</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2008/02/07/changes-coming-to-fox-news-watch/#comment-66721</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2008 18:49:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2008/02/07/changes-coming-to-fox-news-watch/#comment-66721</guid>
					<description>^ You notice I didn't mention Pat Sajack! I forget whether that was on FNC or Fox Broadcast.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>^ You notice I didn&#8217;t mention Pat Sajack! I forget whether that was on FNC or Fox Broadcast.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Missy</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2008/02/07/changes-coming-to-fox-news-watch/#comment-66719</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2008 18:41:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2008/02/07/changes-coming-to-fox-news-watch/#comment-66719</guid>
					<description>Terance, those two were the biggest snoozer programs that ever existed!  Fox News Watch, its format and its host are perfect as they are, but I think they could mix it up a little with the panelists.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Terance, those two were the biggest snoozer programs that ever existed!  Fox News Watch, its format and its host are perfect as they are, but I think they could mix it up a little with the panelists.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Stan</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2008/02/07/changes-coming-to-fox-news-watch/#comment-66718</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2008 18:29:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2008/02/07/changes-coming-to-fox-news-watch/#comment-66718</guid>
					<description>oh no, Fox News Watch with Courtney Friel. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>oh no, Fox News Watch with Courtney Friel.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Terance</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2008/02/07/changes-coming-to-fox-news-watch/#comment-66717</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2008 18:24:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2008/02/07/changes-coming-to-fox-news-watch/#comment-66717</guid>
					<description>I wouldn't mind FNC having another interview program similar to Judith or Cal's show. And since they're the #1 cable news channel, they shouldn't be worried if the ratings are a tad low for this type of action. Just think of it as a public service. For instance, it could be canned and ran on the weekends in a regular spot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I wouldn&#8217;t mind FNC having another interview program similar to Judith or Cal&#8217;s show. And since they&#8217;re the #1 cable news channel, they shouldn&#8217;t be worried if the ratings are a tad low for this type of action. Just think of it as a public service. For instance, it could be canned and ran on the weekends in a regular spot.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: johnny dollar</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2008/02/07/changes-coming-to-fox-news-watch/#comment-66716</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2008 18:19:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2008/02/07/changes-coming-to-fox-news-watch/#comment-66716</guid>
					<description>I'd rather they replace all four panelists than replace Burns.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I&#8217;d rather they replace all four panelists than replace Burns.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Enquiring Minds Want to Know</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2008/02/07/changes-coming-to-fox-news-watch/#comment-66715</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2008 18:15:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2008/02/07/changes-coming-to-fox-news-watch/#comment-66715</guid>
					<description>This is really surprising - I always liked this guy; granted, I think the format has gotten a bit stale, but I don't think it's his fault.  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>This is really surprising - I always liked this guy; granted, I think the format has gotten a bit stale, but I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s his fault.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
