<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/1.5.1-alpha" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Gibson on Shuster&#8230;</title>
	<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2008/02/09/gibson-on-shuster/</link>
	<description>Unvarnished news &#038; opinion on cable news</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 23:55:59 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=1.5.1-alpha</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Aspartame</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2008/02/09/gibson-on-shuster/#comment-67081</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Feb 2008 13:48:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2008/02/09/gibson-on-shuster/#comment-67081</guid>
					<description>Spud, obiviously JG is getting some payback for the full frontal assault MSNBC sent his way after his dumb but hardly fireable words a few weeks ago.  You even glancing the notion that JG could or should've been fired for that is dumb too.  This is an entirely different thing.  He's a reporter, not a talk show host and there's been an obvious pattern of mysogony from these MSNBC hosts. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Spud, obiviously JG is getting some payback for the full frontal assault MSNBC sent his way after his dumb but hardly fireable words a few weeks ago.  You even glancing the notion that JG could or should&#8217;ve been fired for that is dumb too.  This is an entirely different thing.  He&#8217;s a reporter, not a talk show host and there&#8217;s been an obvious pattern of mysogony from these MSNBC hosts.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Bruce</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2008/02/09/gibson-on-shuster/#comment-66996</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Feb 2008 15:38:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2008/02/09/gibson-on-shuster/#comment-66996</guid>
					<description>The Clinton machine is at their old tricks again. Everyone bows to them as if they were Gods.

Sweet Little Chelsea 27 years old. Why can’t she talk with the media? If she is shy why can she contact stars and super-delegates on behalf of her Mother. Or as I like to say. “Hiding behind her Mother’s Boxer shorts”. 

Pimping is not a sexist term. Here is the other meaning of the word “Pimp” or “Pimping”

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pimp#Other_uses

Remember the term “Pimping my Ride” on MTV. Gussy up etc.

If innocent little Chelsea (A grown Woman) is going to contact these Super Delegates isn’t that sort of unethical?

Not sure of the election rules. But if it becomes a matter of having these Super Delegates go against us the common folks that vote for someone. What is the sense of this Primary and Caucus Voting? It is an exercise in futility.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>The Clinton machine is at their old tricks again. Everyone bows to them as if they were Gods.</p>
	<p>Sweet Little Chelsea 27 years old. Why can’t she talk with the media? If she is shy why can she contact stars and super-delegates on behalf of her Mother. Or as I like to say. “Hiding behind her Mother’s Boxer shorts”. </p>
	<p>Pimping is not a sexist term. Here is the other meaning of the word “Pimp” or “Pimping”</p>
	<p><a >http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pimp#Other_uses</a></p>
	<p>Remember the term “Pimping my Ride” on MTV. Gussy up etc.</p>
	<p>If innocent little Chelsea (A grown Woman) is going to contact these Super Delegates isn’t that sort of unethical?</p>
	<p>Not sure of the election rules. But if it becomes a matter of having these Super Delegates go against us the common folks that vote for someone. What is the sense of this Primary and Caucus Voting? It is an exercise in futility.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Ree</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2008/02/09/gibson-on-shuster/#comment-66995</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Feb 2008 15:33:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2008/02/09/gibson-on-shuster/#comment-66995</guid>
					<description>&quot;Except&quot; this is going to help Hillary garner sympathy. Okay I am taking a break from typing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>&#8220;Except&#8221; this is going to help Hillary garner sympathy. Okay I am taking a break from typing.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: myview</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2008/02/09/gibson-on-shuster/#comment-66994</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Feb 2008 15:33:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2008/02/09/gibson-on-shuster/#comment-66994</guid>
					<description>Although Shuster deserves all the negative press thrown at him I do agree with Spud that Gibson should be the last person commenting on this.

 </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Although Shuster deserves all the negative press thrown at him I do agree with Spud that Gibson should be the last person commenting on this.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Ree</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2008/02/09/gibson-on-shuster/#comment-66990</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Feb 2008 15:21:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2008/02/09/gibson-on-shuster/#comment-66990</guid>
					<description>Accept this is only going to help Hillary and garner her sympathy - coincidence? Sure hillary and obama are locked in a fight for delegates but no this wasn't intentional? Who benefits not Obama. Oh yeah we are not even talking about Obama lead with delegates, we have to talk about how Shuster offended Hillary poor Hillary using up the all the air. We are being distracted intentionally or unintentionally. Isn't this what Shuster does for a living so maybe just maybe, he knew what would happen and then why would he have said it? hmm...The Worm turns.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Accept this is only going to help Hillary and garner her sympathy - coincidence? Sure hillary and obama are locked in a fight for delegates but no this wasn&#8217;t intentional? Who benefits not Obama. Oh yeah we are not even talking about Obama lead with delegates, we have to talk about how Shuster offended Hillary poor Hillary using up the all the air. We are being distracted intentionally or unintentionally. Isn&#8217;t this what Shuster does for a living so maybe just maybe, he knew what would happen and then why would he have said it? hmm&#8230;The Worm turns.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: puck</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2008/02/09/gibson-on-shuster/#comment-66981</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Feb 2008 14:30:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2008/02/09/gibson-on-shuster/#comment-66981</guid>
					<description>Aaron, Spud, I think I got it. Slip thought he could get away saying what he said because. Who watches Tucker's show anyway? LOL</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Aaron, Spud, I think I got it. Slip thought he could get away saying what he said because. Who watches Tucker&#8217;s show anyway? LOL
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Aaron</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2008/02/09/gibson-on-shuster/#comment-66972</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Feb 2008 13:40:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2008/02/09/gibson-on-shuster/#comment-66972</guid>
					<description>I think a lot of people at MSNBC are pissed off at Shuster now, if they weren't before.  And for Tucker this is the most publicity NBC ever gave his show.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I think a lot of people at MSNBC are pissed off at Shuster now, if they weren&#8217;t before.  And for Tucker this is the most publicity NBC ever gave his show.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
