<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/1.5.1-alpha" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Shuster: Hillary should back off?</title>
	<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2008/02/12/shuster-hillary-should-back-off/</link>
	<description>Unvarnished news &#038; opinion on cable news</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 14:38:37 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=1.5.1-alpha</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: DanOregon</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2008/02/12/shuster-hillary-should-back-off/#comment-67369</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2008 15:18:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2008/02/12/shuster-hillary-should-back-off/#comment-67369</guid>
					<description>Shuster was justly suspended. Clinton needs to move on and get  her campaign back on track. Lingering on these fights make her seem petty. Unless she is going to stay on MSNBC's butt until the net runs some brutal oppo her staff has dug up on Obama, I don't see how spending two more seconds complaining about MSNBC helps her campaign.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Shuster was justly suspended. Clinton needs to move on and get  her campaign back on track. Lingering on these fights make her seem petty. Unless she is going to stay on MSNBC&#8217;s butt until the net runs some brutal oppo her staff has dug up on Obama, I don&#8217;t see how spending two more seconds complaining about MSNBC helps her campaign.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Ree</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2008/02/12/shuster-hillary-should-back-off/#comment-67354</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2008 09:54:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2008/02/12/shuster-hillary-should-back-off/#comment-67354</guid>
					<description>The Clinton campaign went too far especially calling for Shuster's head..like the Red Queen in Alice in Wonderland...off with his head.

They did a such a good job of making Hillary look like a VICTIM that people believed it so now they think to themselves, she can't take a dumb choice of words by David Shuster, how is she going to be President and deal with real Promblem people, like I don't know Chavez, Kim Jong Illin..ect. Good job Selling the Victim asspect it looks like people bought it..and they don't want a victim for President.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>The Clinton campaign went too far especially calling for Shuster&#8217;s head..like the Red Queen in Alice in Wonderland&#8230;off with his head.</p>
	<p>They did a such a good job of making Hillary look like a VICTIM that people believed it so now they think to themselves, she can&#8217;t take a dumb choice of words by David Shuster, how is she going to be President and deal with real Promblem people, like I don&#8217;t know Chavez, Kim Jong Illin..ect. Good job Selling the Victim asspect it looks like people bought it..and they don&#8217;t want a victim for President.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Aaron</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2008/02/12/shuster-hillary-should-back-off/#comment-67341</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 23:10:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2008/02/12/shuster-hillary-should-back-off/#comment-67341</guid>
					<description>Then if, you question her on her positions or make a non-positive comment about her, you're evil and institutionally biased.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Then if, you question her on her positions or make a non-positive comment about her, you&#8217;re evil and institutionally biased.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Aaron</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2008/02/12/shuster-hillary-should-back-off/#comment-67340</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 23:07:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2008/02/12/shuster-hillary-should-back-off/#comment-67340</guid>
					<description>Because people are tired of her Ira, tired of &quot;yes to plan A&quot; and 30 seconds later &quot;no to plan A&quot;.  They are also tired of &quot;I voted for plan B and it is good&quot; followed by &quot;Plan B was good then and not now that's why I stopped supporting my vote&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Because people are tired of her Ira, tired of &#8220;yes to plan A&#8221; and 30 seconds later &#8220;no to plan A&#8221;.  They are also tired of &#8220;I voted for plan B and it is good&#8221; followed by &#8220;Plan B was good then and not now that&#8217;s why I stopped supporting my vote&#8221;
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Ira</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2008/02/12/shuster-hillary-should-back-off/#comment-67337</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 22:34:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2008/02/12/shuster-hillary-should-back-off/#comment-67337</guid>
					<description>&lt;i&gt;Hillary should back off. She has now moved from real outrage to just plain bullying and bitching.&lt;/i&gt; 

Aaron &amp;amp; Lark22:  Interesting that since the Shuster incident, Hillary has not won a primary or caucus!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p><i>Hillary should back off. She has now moved from real outrage to just plain bullying and bitching.</i> </p>
	<p>Aaron &amp; Lark22:  Interesting that since the Shuster incident, Hillary has not won a primary or caucus!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: bigred</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2008/02/12/shuster-hillary-should-back-off/#comment-67319</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 19:43:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2008/02/12/shuster-hillary-should-back-off/#comment-67319</guid>
					<description>Spud, since when are we allowed to say &quot;bulls__&quot; on here?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Spud, since when are we allowed to say &#8220;bulls__&#8221; on here?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Spud</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2008/02/12/shuster-hillary-should-back-off/#comment-67309</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 19:09:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2008/02/12/shuster-hillary-should-back-off/#comment-67309</guid>
					<description>I think he's referring to Bercovici's blog...but I could be wrong.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I think he&#8217;s referring to Bercovici&#8217;s blog&#8230;but I could be wrong.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Jim</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2008/02/12/shuster-hillary-should-back-off/#comment-67306</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 18:40:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2008/02/12/shuster-hillary-should-back-off/#comment-67306</guid>
					<description>I guess someone is not use to a site that doesn't reflexively purge Clinton sniping. Perhaps they should go back to Hillary Clinton's™ Media Masters.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I guess someone is not use to a site that doesn&#8217;t reflexively purge Clinton sniping. Perhaps they should go back to Hillary Clinton&#8217;s™ Media Masters.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Missy</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2008/02/12/shuster-hillary-should-back-off/#comment-67305</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 18:36:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2008/02/12/shuster-hillary-should-back-off/#comment-67305</guid>
					<description>alphillips, how dare you!  There are lots of good people here and even when we disagree, we're usually pretty cordial about it.

----------

I dislike David Shuster a LOT, based on the degree to which he's bashed conservatives.  But even I think he's getting a raw deal by Hillary and MSNBC.  If chastisement needs to occur, then let it fall to Matthews and Olbermann as well.  But to single this guy out is just unfair.

And re: Obama?  I heard people state that if he beats Hillary and goes on to become the nominee, people will THEN ask where his substance is.  Right now, the world is just in love with him, thinking he's just &quot;dreamy&quot;.  PLEASE!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>alphillips, how dare you!  There are lots of good people here and even when we disagree, we&#8217;re usually pretty cordial about it.</p>
	<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-</p>
	<p>I dislike David Shuster a LOT, based on the degree to which he&#8217;s bashed conservatives.  But even I think he&#8217;s getting a raw deal by Hillary and MSNBC.  If chastisement needs to occur, then let it fall to Matthews and Olbermann as well.  But to single this guy out is just unfair.</p>
	<p>And re: Obama?  I heard people state that if he beats Hillary and goes on to become the nominee, people will THEN ask where his substance is.  Right now, the world is just in love with him, thinking he&#8217;s just &#8220;dreamy&#8221;.  PLEASE!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Kirk G</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2008/02/12/shuster-hillary-should-back-off/#comment-67301</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 17:14:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2008/02/12/shuster-hillary-should-back-off/#comment-67301</guid>
					<description>Schuster fits right in with a micky mouse network. I have never seen a network go ga ga over a person like they are over Obama and damn who they trash. I am not a fan of either but I can see it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Schuster fits right in with a micky mouse network. I have never seen a network go ga ga over a person like they are over Obama and damn who they trash. I am not a fan of either but I can see it.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: alphillips</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2008/02/12/shuster-hillary-should-back-off/#comment-67300</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 17:12:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2008/02/12/shuster-hillary-should-back-off/#comment-67300</guid>
					<description>This is the most inconsistent site on the internet....fold it up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>This is the most inconsistent site on the internet&#8230;.fold it up.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: alphillips</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2008/02/12/shuster-hillary-should-back-off/#comment-67299</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 17:10:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2008/02/12/shuster-hillary-should-back-off/#comment-67299</guid>
					<description>JEFF.....did you ever have the newest model car on the block and find it was a lemon?  Some of us remember the travelling snake oil salesman.....little show....lot of bullshit.....     Barack Obama</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>JEFF&#8230;..did you ever have the newest model car on the block and find it was a lemon?  Some of us remember the travelling snake oil salesman&#8230;..little show&#8230;.lot of bullshit&#8230;..     Barack Obama
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Lark22</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2008/02/12/shuster-hillary-should-back-off/#comment-67298</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 17:07:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2008/02/12/shuster-hillary-should-back-off/#comment-67298</guid>
					<description>I'm a Hillary supporter, and I think she needs to back off as well. Shuster's supension is sufficient IMO.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I&#8217;m a Hillary supporter, and I think she needs to back off as well. Shuster&#8217;s supension is sufficient IMO.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Jim</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2008/02/12/shuster-hillary-should-back-off/#comment-67297</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 17:04:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2008/02/12/shuster-hillary-should-back-off/#comment-67297</guid>
					<description>Funny that Hillary and McCain are BFFs (according to BJ) despite his joke about Janet Reno being Chelsea's father. Perhaps Hillary is saving her outrage over that for a more politically advantageous opportunity?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Funny that Hillary and McCain are BFFs (according to BJ) despite his joke about Janet Reno being Chelsea&#8217;s father. Perhaps Hillary is saving her outrage over that for a more politically advantageous opportunity?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: cornycob</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2008/02/12/shuster-hillary-should-back-off/#comment-67293</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 16:49:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2008/02/12/shuster-hillary-should-back-off/#comment-67293</guid>
					<description>The Clinton's are overprotective of their daughter.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>The Clinton&#8217;s are overprotective of their daughter.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Caufield</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2008/02/12/shuster-hillary-should-back-off/#comment-67292</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 16:47:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2008/02/12/shuster-hillary-should-back-off/#comment-67292</guid>
					<description>I feel bad for Shuster, as MSNBC completely allowed itself to be bullied, and he got thrown under the bus in the process.  What Shuster said was stupid, but spineless MSNBC is the real loser in this whole ordeal.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I feel bad for Shuster, as MSNBC completely allowed itself to be bullied, and he got thrown under the bus in the process.  What Shuster said was stupid, but spineless MSNBC is the real loser in this whole ordeal.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Aaron</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2008/02/12/shuster-hillary-should-back-off/#comment-67289</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 16:33:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2008/02/12/shuster-hillary-should-back-off/#comment-67289</guid>
					<description>Hillary should back off. She has now moved from real outrage to just plain bullying and bitching.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Hillary should back off. She has now moved from real outrage to just plain bullying and bitching.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: DonDeAgo</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2008/02/12/shuster-hillary-should-back-off/#comment-67284</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 14:58:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2008/02/12/shuster-hillary-should-back-off/#comment-67284</guid>
					<description>Hillary is yesterday's news.
Even her mama would vote for Obama.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Hillary is yesterday&#8217;s news.<br />
Even her mama would vote for Obama.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Ree</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2008/02/12/shuster-hillary-should-back-off/#comment-67282</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 14:18:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2008/02/12/shuster-hillary-should-back-off/#comment-67282</guid>
					<description>David Shuster sometimes your the winsheild, sometimes your the bug. If you believe in Karma, then just be patient BG
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>David Shuster sometimes your the winsheild, sometimes your the bug. If you believe in Karma, then just be patient BG
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: StephenMartin</title>
		<link>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2008/02/12/shuster-hillary-should-back-off/#comment-67280</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 13:42:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2008/02/12/shuster-hillary-should-back-off/#comment-67280</guid>
					<description>The only sympathy I have for the guy is that he, and many other journalists, don't get the simple law of cause and effect. You sow what you reap. And you don't always reap from the same field you sow in. This is a prime example of that law being fulfilled. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>The only sympathy I have for the guy is that he, and many other journalists, don&#8217;t get the simple law of cause and effect. You sow what you reap. And you don&#8217;t always reap from the same field you sow in. This is a prime example of that law being fulfilled.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
